preview

Robert Heinlein's Starship Troopers: Book Vs. Movie

Good Essays
Open Document

Nicole Bauman
HU 424 001
Starship Troopers: Book vs Movie Robert Heinlein’s novel Starship Troopers was released in 1959 and later adapted into film by Paul Verhoeven, released in 1997. The movie differs in almost every aspect to the book, except some of the characters names are kept the same. After harsh criticism, Verhoeven went on to explain it was a satirical play on the right-wing militarism of the book. Verhoeven goes on to say, “Basically the political undercurrent of the film is that these heroes and heroines are living in a fascist utopia – but they are not even aware of it!” (Singer). This idea can be seen in the contrasts of the book and movies themes, characters, and action content. The main character in the book is known as Juan …show more content…

In fact, almost all the movie’s main characters are portrayed as white. This includes Carmen Ibanez, in the novel known as Carmencita Ibañez, who is presumably of Hispanic descent. Verhoeven states that he chose these actors because he “…wanted them to look like the people you see in Leni Riefenstahl's movie The Triumph of the Will”, which is a Nazi propaganda film; this claim will be analyzed in the themes of the movie (Singer). In the movie, Carmen had her own storyline throughout in her journey of becoming a pilot and her relationship with Johnnie, while in the book she was a girl Johnnie had a crush on, as was basically never mentioned again. The most likely explanation for this is that some sort of romantic relationship in the movie was deemed necessary to keep viewers enthralled in what they were watching. This also opened up the love triangle between Johnnie, Carmen, and Dizzy Flores, which is another element for movie viewers to get attached to. In the novel, Diz was simply a man that Johnnie had met in boot camp. Through the movie, it may be said that introducing Dizzy gave the audience almost an underdog to root for when it came to Johnnie’s relationship, as well as an …show more content…

With this statement, it is clearly obvious that the themes Heinlein intended for his novel was almost the exact opposite for the movie. In the book, a theme that Heinlein tried to portray, particularly by his characters’ actions, was the importance of one’s personal responsibility to their family and their nation. Although Johnnie seems to be a fairly static character, this theme can be seen in his maturity through the military, primarily in the flashbacks he has when he finally realizes what Mr. Dubois was talking about in History and Moral Philosophy. Johnnie’s responsibility to his family can be most notably seen in the excerpt where he finds out Buenos Aires was bombed to rubble. When he learns his mother is dead and assumes his father is also, he declined taking rest without the rest of his troop so that he could continue to fight alongside them, even with this loss. He may have wanted to avenge his parents’ deaths, but it is more likely that this helped him understand his commitment he made to fight for the safety of those he loved and his nation. Another big theme from the book is militarism; Heinlein even responds to confirm it glorifies the military writing, “It does indeed. Specifically, the P.B.I., the Poor Bloody Infantry, the mudfoot who puts his frail body between his loved home and the war's desolation -- but is rarely

Get Access