Robert Nardelli: The Four Types Of Leadership Style

The trait leadership theory suggested by Ralph M. Stogdill, Trait theory is one of the early methodologies in leadership. Leadership trait theory suggests that leaders are innate rather than prepared. It places highlighting on the individual qualities of persons as signs of leadership success and with definite abilities that will make them shine in leadership parts. Such as cleverness, sense of charge, inventiveness and other values places them in the shoes of a good leader.

A leadership philosophy helps to define and let others know what you expect, what things you value, and how you act as a leader. Different styles of leadership are needed for different situations. Every leader needs to know when and how to display a particular approach of leadership within a group. Leadership strategies define every leader’s personal leadership style. Three leadership styles of a counselor are the following: authoritarian style leaders, democratic style leaders, and laissez-faire style leaders.

One of the theories that can be used to dissect Nardelli’s role as a leader is the trait theory. Trait theories are based upon the concept that leaders are simply born with a set of traits such as social, personal, and personality traits and also physical characteristics that outline how they are as a leader (Baack, 2012). Nardelli had a good foundation of traits for being a leader but there were some personality traits that kept him from being a great leader. He had a strong desire for setting and achieving goals but his interactions with people, employees and customers alike, were what caused him problems. Robert Nardelli was not known as being a personable individual and tended to focus more on the numbers that the stores were generating rather than the people that were providing those numbers. As a leader it is important to be balanced between the two aspects as you cannot have one without the other. It is impossible to lead people if there is no desire to relate to them and this is the issue that Nardelli was faced with. The profits that an organization is generating can only take you so far; it is the people that need to be the focus first and then one can move on to other aspects.

he was resourceful (thanks to his experience from the bottom of the company to the top

Leadership theory, or the scientific approach to understanding leadership, is a vast group of theories that try to explain what makes, or constitutes a great leader. There are many schools of thought on this subject and many pull from existing psychological theories, like Behavioral Theory, Developmental Theory, Personality Theory and Learning theory (Myers, 2014). There are three main leadership theories: trait theory, which suggests that some are born with certain traits that make them an effective leader, while behavioral theory focuses on how leader behave, while contingency theory addresses how the situation influences leadership.

While effective leaders should draw on all elements of all four frames, different sectors adopt slightly different certain frame preferences. Corporate sectors primarily prefer the structural frame with the primarily goal of profit. From the readings, both McNerney and Nardelli sought to make the company “number one or two in their markets.” Both CEO’s acted aggressively, which involved cutting costs and simplifying the organizational structure. However, only McNerney was successful due to Nardelli’s ego and poor application of the human resource and political frames in his relationships with employees and share-holders. Governments, on the other hand, do not have the flexibility of changing their organizing structure. The example of Giuliani

Leaders developed abilities, behaviors and strengths during their careers in a unique way to make an impact of the followers. Leader influence others to accomplish goals, inspired individuals to bring interest to the table, to guide, support and facilitate followers. The are many different leadership styles, however there is many factors to take in consideration; knowledge, personality, charisma, approach and communication.

Trait theories were first of the four most common leadership theories. The foundation of trait theory is; leaders are born with the innate ability to lead. In essence, leadership traits are inherent in the genetic makeup of an individual and are natural, not learned predispositions. On the contrary, current research has found leadership traits to be external behaviors emerging from development of cognitive discipline and knowledge growth.

A leader who is someone who leads. They are responsible for showing their followers a path and helping them along the way. There are several different types of leadership styles ranging from democratic to laissez-faire. Styles of leadership are important in the success and failure of the leaders. One style that has been around since the early empires is authoritarian leadership.

These leadership theories are grouped in trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and power and influence theories. Trait theories focus on the traits and skills that successful leaders must have. Initially, these theories state that these skills are innate, but research shows that individuals can also develop such skills and become leaders. Behavioral theories focus on other issues, like the behavior of leaders within their teams, in relationship with stakeholders, and within society. In accordance with these theories, these are several leadership styles, like autocratic or authoritarian, democratic, participative, laissez faire, and other styles. These theories state that the behavior of leaders significantly influences their and their teams' performance.

There are many styles of leadership, as well as different types of leaders. Leaders can range from being someone who holds a position of power, such as President Barack Obama, or someone who can demand respect and has the ability to lead a group of people like Fletcher Christian in The Bounty. Many people would characterize the managers and heads of companies as capable leaders, or coaches of sports teams as leaders. Between the jobs and roles above, there are several different ways of leadership. Not every group responds the same to the different styles of leadership.

What are leadership styles, and how can one apply these concepts and ideas; like to the situation with the Fourth Interstate Bank’s data center. Leadership styles are a leader’s way of implementing direction, plans; and motivation though that of different leadership types. So, what are these three leadership styles, they are as follows: dictatorial, participative, and free-rein. Although, one can use different approaches to solving problems, finding the proper approach can be difficult unless one balances them out by using certain concepts; which could include participation and decisiveness. But before we consider what style to use one needed to look at each characteristic individually, then determine if it’s the best alternative in helping solve one’s problems; or concerns within the principal form.

In terms of leadership styles a wide variety exists for one to employ (Boykins, 2013). There isn’t firm consensus as to which styles prove to be the most effective. Different situations call for different approaches. In the article, Empirical Study of Leadership Styles, it discusses several leadership styles that I can relate to.

Leadership theories are attempts to answer some of the question people have about leadership. These theories range from simple “armchair philosophies” about the personal characteristics and effect relationship between leaders and followers and situations.

A strong foundation for success and growth was already in place in Home Depot under Marcus leadership. The company demonstrated a very strong culture, built on entrepreneurialism and customer service. Abundant promotion opportunities were created due to rapid growth attracting carpenters, plumbers and other building professionals as salespeople. Most of the non-entry-level jobs were filled internally, and from the 400 department heads, just a dozen came from outside the company. Additionally, employee stock