Roberts V Galen Of Virginia Summary

In the case of Atkins v. Virginia, Daryl Renard Atkins is accused of the kidnapping, robbery, and murder of Eric Michael Nesbitt. Atkins was also charged with use of a firearm while committing each of these offenses ("FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.”, 2017). Atkins was convicted of capital murder and related crimes, by a Virginia jury and sentenced to death, but his case was appealed to the Virginia Supreme Courts, on the grounds that it is unlawful to put to death a person who has intellectual disabilities (Mental Retardation). Virginia Supreme Courts upheld the decision of the Virginia courts

This case involves a physician, Dr. Burditt, who had disregarded the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). This act was implemented to prevent “Medicare-participating hospital from “dumping” patients out of the emergency room” (Pozgar, 2016, p. 245). In this case, Dr. Burditt had had examined the patient and made the decision to transfer her to another hospital that was located quite a distance away. When the patient was evaluated, it was noted that she had “dangerously high blood pressure (210/130) and was in active labor with ruptured membranes” (Pozgar, 2016, p. 245). Dr. Burditt should have continued to treat this patient because of her symptoms, which could have resulted in the death

The Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen (609 S.E.2d 4, Va. 2005) was a fascinating case. The case focused on two expert witness testifying for the state and the other for the defendant, and if they acted and behaved ethically during the proceedings. Successive information will be addressed to prove the thought process behind my opinion given in this case. The APA code of ethics and specialty guidelines will be used to support my reasoning. Furthermore, they will serve as a baseline of boundaries within the profession to determine the expert witness’ influences to the case as well as their behavior within the profession.

Facts: This case consists of Hereford a criminal informant who gets information of narcotic laws to Officer Marsh; a federal narcotic agent with 29 years on the job. Hereford had been feeding Marsh information for close to 6 months and that information was accurate and reliable. In the early days of September 1956, Hereford told Officer Marsh that the defendant James Draper was distributing illegal narcotics throughout Denver. Several days later, Hereford told Marsh that in the days before Draper went to Chicago and set to return with several ounces of heroin. Along with the information given Hereford gave a physical description of Draper, which included his age, weight, race, and clothes that he had

This week’s case study, Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag in front of Dallas City Hall as a means of protest against the policies of the Reagan administration. He was arrested by Dallas police officers and he was charged with violating section 42.09(a)(3) of the Texas Penal Code, which prohibited the “desecration of a venerable object.” In this case, it was the contention of the arresting officers that burning the American flag was an act of desecration which was punishable by law. Section 42.09(a)(3) of the Texas Penal Code was enacted by the Texas State Legislature, at the time when this matter was brought to trial, the parties involved were the State of Texas and Mr. Gregory Lee Johnson. The case was heard by three lower courts before it reached the United States Supreme Court. List those three courts in order, beginning with the court that has the most authority and ending with the court that has the least

EMTALA is the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act that was developed in 1985 as part of the Title IX of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act that went into effect in the year 1986 (Sara Rosenbaum, 2012). EMTALA was developed after an article was published in 1986 that documented how Cook County Hospital in Chicago was receiving patients that were “dumped” there that were unemployed, minorities, and lacked health insurance (Singer, 2014). This problem also occurred in 1983 in Dallas where over 200 patients were transferred between hospitals that were not stable (Singer, 2014). EMTALA is under the direction of the Department of Health and Human Services and was developed to address the needs of Americans

At the current moment, doctors’ offices can refuse care to any uninsured person, whereas an emergency room cannot. The hospital is required by federal law to adequately screen and stabilize a patient. This is where the uninsured tend to show up for care where they tend to seek emergency care for urgent medical conditions that might not have been there due to lack of insurance. This would include the screening tests such as a colonoscopy or a mammogram for preventative care. This can delay the diagnosis of a serious complication that might have easily been taken care of through preventative services. The uninsured and underinsured are generally not as healthy as the insured counterparts. There is also lack of follow up care and medication to make sure the disease is under control. This group of

Both rulings bring about interesting points involving how healthcare is paid for, purchased, and how it is determining who is eligible for it. Health care alone is a unique market that combines many variables with few realistic purchasing alternatives and affordable options for care treatments. Those treatments are very expensive and traditionally difficult to pay out of pocket for Most people except for their yearly check-ups and immunizations do not plan for the random costs and unintentional illnesses and injury that are exclusive to the healthcare market. The costs associated with ER visits, which tend to be relatively expensive, and the healthcare provided to those whether they are uninsured or insured incurs a significant cost that is

Essential healthcare management includes the financial growth and feasibility of the health care organization. In order for a healthcare organization to reach its full potential it needs to be fully staffed with both medical and managerial professionals, as well as having the funds to invest in the most up to date technology. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation “Baseline estimates show that over 41 million individuals were uninsured in 2013, 61% of uninsured adults said the main reason they were uninsured was because the cost was too high or because they had lost their job”. The EMTALA or Emergency Medical Treatment And Labor Act or anti-dumping law was enacted in 1986 it was designed to prevent hospitals from transferring the uninsured or Medicaid patients to public hospitals without providing a medical screening examination to ensure they were stable for transfer first. Regardless of their options to pay, they are to be seen and treated with life-saving and "stabilizing" emergency care with transfers to advanced trauma centers, if need be. Effective Human Resources coupled with a balance between cost and revenue are essential to being able to provide quality Health Care. It has been proven these elements all play positive roles in contributing to the overall efficiency of the system. An organization can enhance the quality of health care provided just by focusing on the major components.

The movie Loving is based off of the court case Loving v. Virginia. Even after the Civil Rights act of 1964 that outlawed discrimination based on race, origin, and religion, had not yet edified the question of marriage. States, such as Virginia, still imposed a ban on interracial marriages. The charges against the protagonists, Mildred and Richard Loving, spiked my interest because of the enhanced step taken by society as was taken in modern times during the same-sex marriage case Obergefell v. Hodges. The court during the twentieth century was forced to question our evolving standards of decency and define our Constitutional rights given to us by Equal Protection and Due Process laws of the fifth and fourteenth amendment.

In the U.S. Constitution we have the Preamble, the seven Articles, and the 27 Amendments. Despite that our rights/liberties are protected there will be cases where these rights are violated. In 2008, the Washington D.C. v Heller case dealt with the Second Amendment which questioned if we have a right to own a handgun? The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This case dealt whether it was a violation to have a law that prevents from having a registered loaded handgun in ones home to feel safe and protected.

In the case of Johnson verse Misericordia Community Hospital, Johnson was undergoing hip surgery to

Society would be different today if the Loving v. Virginia case didn’t occur in 1967 (Loving v. Virginia:the case over interracial Marriage ). Richard Loving and Mildred Jeter were a couple of different races. They wished to get married as Richard was Caucasian and Mildred was African American. Their want to change America impacted the opinions of Americans nation-wide. They faced many troubles and changed the United States for the greater good.

Because of the EMTALA, therefore, much more than emergency room care is provided regardless of ability to pay” (Menzel, 2011, p. 84).

Block, W. (2008). Is there a human right to medical insurance?. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 27(1/4), 1-33. Retrieved from http://secure.pdcnet.org.ezproxy.liberty.edu:2048/pdc/bvdb.nsf/toc?openform&journal=pdc_bpej&yearrange=1999 –2009&category=0027_40182_2008