Robotic Surgery

Ben-Or, S., Nifong, W., & Chitwood, W. (2013). Robotic Surgical Training. The Cancer Journal, 19(2), 120-123.

Al). This includes the increase in dexterity, the restore of proper hand-eye coordination, and improvement of visualization (Meyers et al.). In Cameron Scott’s article from the Healthline News, “Is da Vinci Robotic Surgery a Revolution or a Ripoff?,” he states that robotic devices including the da Vinci surgical device succeeds well in urology and the removal of prostate. Prostate removal is extremely difficult for open surgery practice, however the da Vinci made is easier with about 90 percent of these kinds of surgeries are now done robotically (Scott). Some evidence even suggest that with robotics used in prostatectomy, there is less blood loss, faster recovery, and fewer internal scarring (Scott.). There are many other examples from hospitals and manufactures that support the uses of robotic surgery and its benefits. However, even though these new technologies of robotic devices are supposedly be helping patients and making surgeries less invasive, they are still many concerns of how they should be properly regulated.

For example, robotic technology is helping amputees by offering robotic body parts. This scientific breakthrough gives a person the power to grab things for themselves or get around without a wheelchair and continue with normal life. Robots not only help patients, but they also help the doctors by assisting with surgery. One example is the new DaVinci surgical system. This device allows the doctor to perform complex surgery with a minimally invasive approach through a separate console that magnifies the doctor’s view of the working area. This new technique allows the doctor to perform the same work on a minimalized scale which makes it easier to perform tasks where the human hand is too big to work. This minimally invasive approach also helps patients recover from surgery since the incision is smaller, reducing the risk of infections. According to DaVinci’s website, this new technology has helped over 3 million patients worldwide, which shows that many people are not afraid to trust these machines to do their job.

Imagine a place where robots can not only decrease mistakes, but it can also save many lives during dangerous and high risk surgeries. I have had friends and family have these procedures done, and it was helpful and successful. Telerobotic surgeries are helpful, it prevents less to no mistakes, less deaths, and makes procedures easier.

“One large national study, which compared outcomes among Medicare patients, indicated that surgery with a robot might lead to fewer

Robotic-assisted surgery is starting to become the new way of performing surgeries. More and more hospitals are starting to invest in the technology to perform these types of surgeries. With the way technology keeps advancing, this will most likely be the way all surgeries are performed in the future. There are many things people need to be informed about such as, what robotic-assisted surgery is, what the pros of robotic assisted surgery are, and what the cons of robotic-assisted surgery are.

1. After looking at the type of work that Pew Charitable Trust Fund, I came up with a type of research that I would like to study. The Pew Foundations deals with medical issues such as drug safety and the safety of medical devices. Recently, the use of the Da-Vinci robotic surgery became a common option for surgery throughout many fields of medicine such as Oncology, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, and Neurology. This robotic surgery is suppose to be a less invasive surgery method which operates through a few small incisions rather then invasively causing large scars. These different fields use the Da-Vinci as an alternative to operating surgeries. This advance of medicine brings up many questions about how efficient this option is, how much faster or slower it is, or if it is even safe. A topic I want to look at in regard to this robotic surgery is the issue if post-operation infection and pain is higher with the use of the Da-Vinci or with the use of regular invasive surgery.

This includes the increase in dexterity, the restore of proper hand-eye coordination, and improvement of visualization (Meyers et al.). In Cameron Scott’s article from the Healthline News, “Is da Vinci Robotic Surgery a Revolution or a Ripoff?,” he states that robotic devices including the da Vinci surgical device succeeds well in urology and the removal of prostate. Prostate removal is extremely difficult for open surgery practice, however the da Vinci made is easier with about 90 percent of these kinds of surgeries are now done robotically (Scott). Some evidence even suggest that with robotics used in prostatectomy, there is less blood loss, faster recovery, and fewer internal scarring according to reports mention in Eastham’s article (Eastham et al.). There are many other examples from hospitals and manufactures that support the uses of robotic surgery and its benefits. However, even though these new technologies of robotic devices are supposedly be helping patients and making surgeries less invasive, they are still many concerns of how they should be properly regulated.

The 21st century can rightfully be considered as the era of technology when the new inventions and discoveries will most likely affect all the segments of human life. At this point, some of the breakthrough inventions of our times have been in the medical field. Robotic surgery has become an almost common practice in the advanced medical world and new uses for robotic assisted surgery are everyday set in place. However, such developments also attract different interests and implications.

When it comes to some operations, surgical robots may not be worth the extra time or money.

Our world runs on technology. The introduction of the home personal computer and the internet launched our society to a modernized, technology-depended community. Vast array of information are available to us every minute of every day. If any of us have a question that we needed the answer to, all we have to do is use Bing or Google or some other search engine and search for the answer. It is so easy now to obtain information. Furthermore, technology has greatly affected healthcare. Due to the technological advances in medicine, our society has the longest life span in history. Illnesses such as infections, wounds and other ailments that used to be fatal can now be cured by simply ingesting medicine. An aspect of medicine that is gradually becoming the focus of technological advancement is surgery. Surgeries can now be performed with the help of robots. The utilization of these robotic surgical systems is one of the main controversial issues many physicians debate about. The uncertainty as to what extent technology should influence medicine makes this issue interesting.

Minimally Invasive Surgical (MIS) techniques have developed in many areas, from vascular and neurosurgery, to genitourinary surgery, assisting physicians to perform highly intricate procedures every day with the help of MIS techniques. Barry (2011) states, “Recent estimates suggest that as many as 85% of all radical prostatectomies are now being done laparoscopically with robotic assistance.” These techniques have given the opportunity for patients to encounter less pain, faster recoveries, and smaller scars allowing patients to return to regular daily activities sooner. Additionally, robot surgeons Gerhardus (2003) stated “ Minimally Invasive surgery reduces the amount of inpatient hospital

There are some drawbacks, there is always a risk of infection, but the most prevalent risk is that the equipment requires a surgeon to move the instruments while watching a video monitor. The surgeon must

Technology is transforming the medical field with the design of robotic devices and multifaceted imaging. Even though these developments have made operations much less invasive, robotic systems have their own disadvantages that prevent them from replacing surgeons all together. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is a broad notion encompassing a lot of common procedures that existed prior to the introduction of robots. It refers to general procedures that keep away from long cuts by entering the body through small, usually about 1cm, entry incisions, through which surgeons use long-handled instruments to operate on tissue inside the body. Such operations are directed by viewing equipment and, therefore, do not automatically need the use of a robot. Yet, it is not incorrect to say that computer-assisted and robotic surgeries are categories that fall under minimally invasive surgery (Robotic Surgery, n.d.).

According to Mary Anne Dunkin’s article Surgery Goes Robotic, the invention of surgical robots was intended for military use only because it would provide a way for doctors to perform safe surgeries within the battlefield. The use of a surgical robot within the military would have allowed doctors to perform emergency surgeries within the battlefield (Childress). The only issue that was detected was the delay that occurs among signals. Unfortunately, “… it turned out that the delicateness of the robot would not lend itself to being out in the deserts of Iraq or the Sudan,” as Dr. Stubbs mentioned to Dunkin. Within Dunkin’s article, she mentions that even though the purpose of surgical robots was for military use only, “robotic technology could play a crucial role in surgeries performed in traditional operating rooms,”(Dunkin). About thirty years ago, the usage of robotics in medical procedures seemed farfetched because one would have never thought that the use of robots in the medical field would become the answer for many surgeons’ problems. For surgeons, the invention of the surgical robot gave them hope for a better future within their profession.