Rock And Roll Piracy Essay

There are internet service providers that are helping in the fight against internet pirates. However, there are also service providers that are helping in the fight that do not enforce the antipiracy rules enough and that allows the pirates to continue on with piracy. The problem is that internet piracy has been around for quite a while. “Still, in the eyes of the industry, illegal downloads remain a lingering problem. According to the RIAA, since Napster emerged in 1999, music sales in the U.S. have fallen 53%, from $14.6 billion in 1999 to $7 billion in 2013” (Jones 1). The problem has been around since the late 1990s and has since then evolved more with more torrent sites being created and giving people opportunities for free music or free movies. This has caused a problem with many people in the music and film industries. The music industry has suffered more from internet piracy with internet pirates constantly posting music on torrent sites that allows most users to download them for free. This causes music sales to go down and this causes the music industry to lose more money than they could have gained if everybody bought their music. Consider piracy of music and giving it away for free a way of theft. Bootlegging is robbing music sales as well as people do buy pirated albums as wells. This just goes to show the problem with piracy is getting bigger.

Each day an estimated 400,000 films exchange hands through the Internet. Movie piracy, once reserved to pirate syndicates and illegal duplication factories, has become a common staple among college students with high-speed internet access. With advanced compression technology, movie files can be transferred across continents in hours and across campus networks in under ten minutes. File-sharing is seen as a victimless crime, but the motion picture industry is expected to lose $3.5 billion this year alone due to piracy. Pirate activities undermine every aspect of the legitimate filmmaking business since legitimate retailers cannot possibly compete fairly with pirate business.

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) (originally known as the E-PARASITE Act) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) were a series of bills promoted by Hollywood and US Congress that would have a created a "blacklist" of censored websites. Although originally aimed to prevent American citizens form accessing foreign websites that were grounds for illegal online distribution of pirated software and movies, the way the bill was written was vague enough that in theory it would be allow for the removal of material that did not infringe on any copyright laws. The other problem was that it would be allowed to shut down sites that

From the moment consumers were able to use the internet to get music, software, and movies, piracy has had serious financial implications on the motion picture industry. Copyright protection presents some difficulty in illegally obtaining movies but there are many avenues around most of these systems. The RIAA, or Recording Industry Association of America, has tried several legal ploys to prevent people from accessing this material but many consumers continue to access it with little concern. Much like the music industry, which was challenged to reinvent its distribution model, the movie industry has to do the same thing. To counter the amount of piracy the movie studios must develop new systems for content delivery including streaming new release movies at home.

This research project was inspired by continuous media coverage on the rise of digital piracy in Australia, the creation of new legislation related to piracy, in addition to the losses of local film creators and the familiarity of digital piracy within my peers. As a result of my research, I discovered that digital piracy has become common in response to delayed releases and high prices exclusive to Australia, and piracy has severe economic consequences for the film industry. My outcome is in the format of a formal report, following the structure of government reports, explaining the motives and consequences of digital piracy while providing evidence answering my question. My key findings conclude that digital piracy is

The government’s position in the media piracy issue is more complicated. Governments must try to appease the industries but also face the conflict of consumer interests (Harmon 2003). This involves

Entertainment today is mainly provided though a digital spectrum. Purchasing and streaming videos and music off of sites like Amazon, Spotify, Netflix, and ITunes, are some the ways of acquiring digital media legally. Production companies and record labels are making a great deal of money in today’s society; but with unauthorized peer-to-peer systems illegally downloading music and movies, there is a dramatic change in the potential profit for these industries. The RIAA claims (Recording Industry Association) “that more than 2.6 billion files of music were illegally downloaded every month on unauthorized peer-to-peer (P2P) systems" (Roda, 2003). Companies are trying to protect copyright infringement by implementing digital encryption

You are a movie producer that is making the next big movie and you are trying to make sure that it is the best thing that you have ever made. You make a movie titled Piracy or not, you put a lot of time and money into trying to make this movie. You finally finish and wants your movie to make you some money so that you can feed your family and buy that dream house and car that you always wanted. Someone, a stranger, perhaps, or someone that you know really well, decides that your movie is so great, but they know that others don’t want to pay the two dollars that you want the people to pay. So, they decide to put your movie on a website that people don’t have to pay to download the movie. You finally realize that you are not making any money because everyone has downloaded your movie for free from hotmoviesnow.com. Piracy can happen to anyone and that is a fact, and everyone needs to protect their movies and music. Many people just ask that you pay the one or two dollars that they want you to pay to download it legally instead of illegally. If the shoe was on the other foot, then you would want them to pay you for the time and money that you put into the music and movies. Online Piracy is a federal crime and it should be prosecuted because it is illegal, many should already know the difference between right and wrong, and it is stealing from the people who have worked so hard to think of, and write the material that you are trying to steal.

The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) claims its industry loses $250 billion per year to piracy, along with 750,000 American jobs. Studies show, however, that consumers don’t care. A survey conducted by Irdeto, a provider of digital security technologies, confirmed that most people know piracy is illegal. Only 19%, however, said they would stop watching pirated content because of the supposed financial losses caused by

Some people have an interest in opening a new business for themselves. Nowadays, people have ways of making money easily on their own. There are several ways people do to get money, for example, cab driving, ride sharing, selling food on the street and opening stores to sell pirated movies. Everyone has their own opinion on pirated movies but the pirated movie is the illegal duplicate of films for private enterprise or individual use. The use of movies lacking approval from the author or holder of that press, or to earn such media, by law, and formulate it available through binder allocate web for different people to use. This form of exercise is called piracy, also those who act in these applications are known as pirates. Many people like to pirate movies because there has been a technological advancement and internet therefore connectivity is easy and accessible, Hollywood movies are expensive and people cannot afford, lack of law enforcement to copywriters perpetrator. The fact that, people have access to internet connectivity, cannot afford to buy movies, lack of strict law enforcement on copywriters in the desire to watch rare and new movies does not give an individual the authorities to acquire that movie; software or anything illegal means. People assume that its normal to steal content originally but do not consider the implications, the film companies, and

In todays digital age it had become easier to download and distribute media. Many individuals have continued to evaluate whether or not punishments for media piracy are harsh enough. This essay will discuss the strengths and weakness of allowing the punishment to stay the same for media piracy. It will also demonstrate why increasing the punishment will have a negative effect on society.

There are considerable numbers of accounts for downloading movies and music illegally. First of all according to the article by Sudler (2013), the digital revolution is one of the major aspects, which has contributed the increase in piracy levels as it has allowed people to store information digitally. Moreover, the invention of World Wide Web is classified as one of the other significant causes since it has resulted in expanding on the Internet piracy considerably (ibid). Furthermore, high-speed networks and developments in broadband technology have been playing a significant role on the Internet piracy (ibid).

Thousands of people illegally download all types of digital media off of the internet daily. This can include music, games, or various types of software. The owner’s of the intellectual property being pirated would have you believe that the destruction of their respective industries is imminent due to the piracy and that that everyone who takes part is immoral and nothing more than a common thief. They insist that the only way to stop piracy is through stricter enforcement laws. In reality the piracy is harmless, if not beneficial to the media industries, and the people doing it are just as harmless. The real threat is to the people and our personal

The digital revolution has been one of the most important causes in control of piracy. As the arrival of the digital revolution, it has become not difficult to copy digital information without losing in its features. One more significant cause has been the introduction of the Internet, a commercial Internet protocol that has basically opened the front gate to low cost worldwide sharing. A third facilitator has been the fast growth of high speed internet. Developments in broadband technology have permitted people to upload and download enormous files fast. The existence of these three causes has become a ‘perfect storm’ for illegal downloading. As a result this could considerably destroy market progression and sustainability of companies. (Sudler, 2013).

Unfortunately, with each announcement of new protective software, a counter program almost instantly is created, matched, and supported through counter hacking technology that makes files available to these large copying networks. Any person with knowledgeable code in computers is capable of decoding these files. This desire to ‘liberate’ files by many hackers is only a sign to show that the industry should be developing ways to work with the technology and not against it. The Recording Industry Association of America recently filed lawsuits against four college students, running ftp servers on campus networks. A federal judge in California settled the case quickly, and despite the fact that the students never actually accepted responsibility, they settled to pay $12,000 to $17,500 in fines. A case that ended without a clearly defined verdict proves that it is difficult to have a true scapegoat for responsibility of piracy violations and copyright infringement. “The internet is like one gigantic copying machine,” says David Nimmer, a lawyer who spends most of his time with disputes in Intellectual property. “Once on the internet, copying becomes effortless, costless, widespread, and immediate.” Nimmer is an experienced lawyer who is well aware of the easy access to the copied files and has trouble himself challenging illegality in certain situations. Copyright law does not make a distinction