Rodrik And Subramanian Case Study Questions And Answers

What evidence is there in the extract above of examples of each of these factors? Which of the three, if any appear to dominate in this extract?

On one side of the issue the supporters of developmental aid believe that the United States is doing more than a great job by offering economic assistance to countries that need help to develop. These individuals are aware of the unfortunate poverty levels in many countries abroad. They believe that it is the duty of the American people to help reduce the poverty levels in countries in which people live with less than a dollar a day. In fact, some supporters believe that the U.S. is not offering enough support to the poorer countries. Many have

3. What basic economic problem in the newly independent post-colonial countries was foreign assisted development intended to address? (Hint: savings.)

Riddell, Roger C. 2007. Does Foreign Aid Really Work? 1st ed. OXFORD: Oxford University Press, USA.

The JSTOR Review by Kristian Hoelscher on the book Dead Aid elaborates how Moyo “half-right” in her critique of foreign aid nonetheless Hoelscher mentions how “her review is unfortunately shallow and lacking nuance” in the areas of acknowledging the successes of aid in Africa. Additionally, another review of JSTOR by S.U. Fwatshak reiterated how “aid could not have been the fundamental reason why Africa poor… African’s problem are rooted in a mosaic of a factors (157).” These two reviews provided to be good sources to shed light on the issues of foreign aid and to counter-balance the Moyo’s critique on aid. Lastly, the book is quite short with only one-hundred and eighty-three pages therefore it seemed so like some concepts needed to be elaborated more but were not. On the other hand, the reason I choose this as a source because it does a suitable job in showing the history of aid, speaking on aid effectiveness, and exemplifying the stagnant economic growth (e.g. ten percent Africans are living in poverty in the 1970s compared to seventy-percent now (Moyo 33)). While, I wished the book concentrated more in a section of Africa, such as Sub-Saharan, it was an insightful and factual

In an article title Military Aid Should Do No Harm by William D. Hartung, the author is

Historically, aid has been viewed as a viable and effective response to natural disasters, post-war reconstruction and economic development. Aid has been successful in providing people with food, water, clothing, and medicines after tsunamis and relocating the newly homeless after hurricanes. After World War II, aid in the form of the Marshall Plan undeniably rescued Europe from the throws of economic fallout. For these reasons, politicians, citizens, famous rock stars and even some businesses have advocated aid as a method to increase economic development. Sadly, the results have been far from what was expected. The Africa Progress Panel reported that a 7 percent growth rate is needed to make any considerable progress in poverty reduction

The arguments on aid have been seen largely from two perspectives: idealistic and realistic points of view. The idealist arguments are normative, with no real possibilities of assessing their validity. In contrast, evidence can be gathered to test the economic consequences of aid although different interpretations of the evidence are always possible and disagreements over the conclusiveness of the test are

On one hand, aid can improve the overall environment of countries as seen with countries that have survived natural disasters (hurricanes, tsunamis, floods, etc.). However, on the other hand, aid can be misused as seen with Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline where the oil money is being used to purchase weapons and rig election instead of serving the people (NBC News). Another problem with providing aid is the bias that is introduced upon distribution, this is seen in times of conflict where one side is chosen over another to receive aid. Ways to improve aid are to: 1) ensure that the rules attached to given aid are clear, agreed on, and enforced; 2) ensure that aid is available to

Western aid is known to fail to reverse poverty in poor nations for many reasons. The poor nations cannot continue to provide the aid that the western nations were able to give them. There is no real source of income from the poor nations to provide for the aid talked about in our textbook Think Twice such as pesticides for crops or contraceptives. These things were only ever able to be provided through assistance and donations. The aid provided by the westerners ultimately fails because it cannot be sustained. The aid also takes away the control of the poor because they are no longer able to provide for themselves. This causes them to feel helpless which has no positive effect on reversing poverty. Although the Western Aid only has good intentions

"A Better Approach to Foreign Aid." Opposing Viewpoints in Context, Gale, July 2008, ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/AcademicJournalsDetailsPage/AcademicJournalsDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Journals&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=OVIC&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&mode=view&catId=&uAccessed 8 Mar. 2017.

information in the analysis. The Appendix to this teaching note contains a discussion of these

The film Black Gold is a good, albeit biased, take on the state of the coffee industry in the African nation of Ethiopia. Taken almost purely from the view of the farmers, it sheds light on the conditions they live in and opens the eyes to prime examples of dependency theory and conflict theory. Although panned by many critics for its lack of economic breakdown on a more global scale, the film shows the viewer how these issues really feel to those at the bottom of the ladder. Black Gold was released in 2006 by brothers and filmmakers, Nick and Marc Francis. Its focus is on the coffee trade worldwide using the smaller focal point of the country of Ethiopia and even more specifically, the Oromia Coffee Union (a cooperative of some 74,000 farmers,

On the basis of the viewpoints ascertained above, I firmly agree with author Jeffrey Sachs on the premise of utilizing foreign aid as a tool for economic development and helping improve the lives of others however, regarding policy I contend that state governments should not become the direct beneficiaries of aid. This is to say that instead of providing capital resources to governments which according to Swanson’s article can “make governments more despotic, and can also increase the risk of civil war since there is less power-sharing”1 [3] we should instead focus on a project based-approach forms of foreign aid as seen evident in the combat of malaria in Africa. Such approaches have (according to Sachs) have been successful. For example,

In terms of independent variables, by referring to the Appendix, figure 1 reveals the summary of the sample; it also