Roe V. Wade's Drop In Crimes

Few Supreme Court decisions have stirred up as much controversy, vitriolic debate, and even violence as the one delivered in Roe v. Wade in 1973. Four decades later, it remains a touchstone for the culture wars in the United States and a pivot upon which much of American politics turns. In fact, the authors of “Roe v. Wade: The Abortion Rights Controversy in American History” state that even today, the case (and its companion cases) “remains the most divisive and controversial judicial decision of the twentieth century” (3). Although it is a landmark case in itself, its continuing influence on American law and politics proves that its legacy lives on far beyond its formal resolution in a court of law. Essentially, the most important points are that the cause of the case’s complexity and drama is the legal relationship between men and women that the ruling mirrored and compounded, the way the medical profession was impacted, and the political significance that the issue still holds presently.

Reiman and Leighton comprehensively begin the discussion of crime by outlining their main objectives, establishing the immediate problems surrounding crime control in America, and setting the groundwork for their premises. In recent years, the crime rate in the United States has declined. This decline is generally attributed to ‘tough on crime’ and mass incarceration policies, but the authors are quick to assert that other variables--economic, social-- are greater contributors to this decrease, with the ‘imprisonment binge’ only actually contributing a small amount to the decline. These strict crime enforcement policies might have a small impact on crime prevention, but criminologists are concerned with the potential effect such policies might have on criminal justice procedures--promoting profit rather than safety-- and endangering citizens’ rights (particularly those considered minorities).

For American politics, Roe v. Wade is seen as a turning point of sorts. The first big battle “won” in favor of reproductive rights being left in the hands of those with uteruses and not the government, or doctor’s designation. Before Roe v. Wade, abortions were considered to be illegal in America. However, that doesn’t mean they weren’t being conducted. In fact, the states had their own individual rulings on abortion. Nonetheless, unfortunately, this victory didn’t last very long before things began to revert back to how they were before. After Roe v. Wade, the states found loopholes to the rulings to still prevent people from legally obtaining an abortion. Loopholes were discovered, new laws were created and the fight was back on again Not much has changed on the current abortion policies, each state is allowed to make their own law and policy regarding abortions and in some states, they’re banned once again. However, before we talk about the present laws regarding reproductive rights, let’s look at early American history, the 1900s, and finally the present.

The Public Policy of Crime and Criminal Justice, by Nancy E. Marion and Willard M. Oliver. Published by Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2006 by Pearso

|Crime. Ed. Louise Gerdes. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Apollo Library. 12 Dec. 2009 |

performed the abortions. Women activists were upset about abortions being illegal because women were going to the black market to get abortions by unlicensed doctors. Many different methods have been used to carry out abortions. In 1965, illegal abortions were responsible for one-sixth of all pregnancy and childbirth related deaths. Sharp objects, herbs, hangers, and other means were used to perform abortions. On January 22, 1973, having an abortion became legal in the United States and could not be denied to any women. The Supreme Court decision in the Roe vs. Wade case protected women’s rights. This case caused a major turning point on the abortion issue and the government. Roe Vs. Wade was probably one of the most famous court

In his new book, The Divide, Matt Taibbi takes a look at the inconsistency between a major fall in crime rates and yet an increase in prison population. Taibbi shows, through many examples that poverty rates plummeted during the 2000s. Naturally, if an individual faces more poverty related situations in their lives, he or she is more likely to take part in illegal activities. But Taibbi presents this isn't the case here. Within the last few decades as poverty levels have been going up, violent crime rates have been decreasing continuously. Although there are reports of violent crime rates going down, it just doesn't seem to make any logical sense how the prison population in America keeps increasing unless looked at from different academic

In chapter four of Freakonomics, Levitt and Dubner discuss the downturn of criminal activity in the United States. They begin the chapter by giving a summary of Romania’s abortion law, and then they switch to the history of criminal activity in the U.S. At the end, they also make sure to connect the ideas while including clear explanations of their perspectives (Levitt and Dubner 105-132). The way they examine some of the most impactful components that decreased felonies in the U.S., such as dependency on prisons and police strategies/quantity, is done in an effective way for the reader to understand.

In chapter 4 the chapter considers a variety of possible explanations for the significant drop in crime and crime rates that occurred in the 1990s. Based on articles that appeared in the country’s largest newspapers, the authors compile a list of the leading, commonly offered explanations. The next step is to systematically examine each explanation and consider whether available data support the explanation. What the authors, in fact, demonstrate is that in all but three cases–increased reliance on prisons, increased number of police, and changes in illegal drug markets–correlation was erroneously interpreted as causation and in some cases, the correlation wasn’t even that strong.

The challenge of crime policy is that crime is not evenly distributed across the socio-economic population. There are a multitude of reasons why this is a fact, but what is important to know, is that it greatly impacts crime policy. Criminal justice policies have vastly changed, especially in the last fifty years, in an effort to respond to citizens’ needs because of the uneven distribution of crime. Therefore, this means it is a reactionary response. It is imperative to remember that crime tends to effect the poor, the young, and particular ethnic groups more, when examining criminal justice policies. Policies that are of the criminal justice persuasion in their nature, in the extent of the policies, and in their impact directly effects the liberties of a governments’ citizens are always in flux.

In “Where have all of the criminals gone?,” Levitt and Dubner discuss the theorized causes of the unexpected crime drop in the 1990s. Before introducing all of the possibilities, the authors provide a brief history of abortion in Romania. When Nicolae Ceausescu became dictator of Romania he made abortion illegal, banned contraception, and discontinued sex education in hopes of growing the population (p. 116). The children born following this were “worse in every measurable way: they would test lower in school, they would have less success in the labor market, and they would also prove much more likely to become criminals” (p. 116). In 1989, thousands of people took to the streets to protest Ceausescu’s regime and ultimately capturing him and killing him. “It should not

The national crime rate has been dropping for the past several years. Over a 38% drop has been reported since 1993. The drop in the crime rate of America is mainly because of three top reasons. These reasons include the involvement of the community, the offenders of small crimes are being interrogated to come up with leads of larger crimes, and the new computer technology available today.

In this paper I will discuss and explain anatomy of a crime decline in New York City as well as if in these days can we say that the city is safe. Purpose of this book " The City That Become Safe " written by Franklin E. Zimring is to show us how crime rate changed during 1990 to 2009. According to author this book presents a detailed profile of New York City crime over 20 years period. Book provides the vital statistics of the crime drop by type of crime, by borough, and by year. There are two reasons that such exhaustive detail is required as a beginning to the study. First, the size and the length of the drop are without precedent in the recorded history of American urban crime. The second reason that the details of the crime decline are needed is as a road map for explaining what changes in the city and its government might have caused this epic decline. The more we know about the specific character of the decline- when it happened, where it happened, which offenses- the better our capacity for sorting through different theories of what caused the drop. In addition, shifts the focus from the two decades of the decline to an assessment of current conditions in the city. How safe is New York City?.

In this essay I will examine how government polices since the last general election have impacted crime levels. The economic model of crime pioneered by Gary S. Becker in 1968 describes how criminals weigh up the costs and benefits of criminal activity against the legal alternatives. The model has four main aspects in it, which are: the utility derived from legal work (U (W)), the likelihood of getting caught when engaging in criminal activity (p), utility from successful crime (U(W ͨ )) and the disutility from punishment when getting caught (U(S))

In the 1990s, as crime was continuing to rise at a steady rate, American leaders soon realized they had a crisis on their hands. In response to this, President Bill Clinton released a bill in 1994 aiming to take extreme action in combatting crime. This bill included many actions such as increasing the amount of police officers, more funding for cities’ law enforcement programs, and enforcing