Rogue Trader COSO Control Questionnaire
Control Environment:
1). The possibility of Nick Leeson being able to defraud Barings can be explained by the lack of management supervision. Since Leeson was making a lot of money for the company, senior executives didn’t punish him. Here are three examples of this: * The funding kept coming even after company realized that Singapore law had funding restrictions * Senior Executives didn’t punish Leeson for the violations he had committed * After Leeson was arrested, management didn’t seek any ways to comment on his actions.
2). Barings bank was more concerned with the bottom line profits rather than compliance with the code of conduct. The film didn’t exactly show if Barings had a
…show more content…
5). The film didn’t portray a formal evaluation of Leeson, which makes it difficult to say whether or not ethics are woven into the criteria to determine performance.
6). Management lacks the ability to react appropriately when receiving bad news from subordinates. For example, when Brenda Granger, who had transferred cash to Leeson to meet SIMEX payments, told Ron Baker that 20 million of margin payments in one day’s trading are a lot, Ron didn’t react. His main argument was that Nick is making a ton of money for the Barings and it doesn’t matter what he does to accomplish this. When Leeson suggested he stopped trading, Ron made Leeson understand that this was out of the question. 7). When instances of noncompliance occur, board members and senior executives take appropriate actions. For instance, Leeson’s assistant sold twenty contracts instead of buying them; Simon Jones’s decision was to fire her immediately. Even though the punishment was very severe, it still showed that board members and senior executives did take action when noncompliance occurred. However, Barings didn’t ensure action through testing. They were not concerned with the reason for the mistake and didn’t see the need to investigate what went wrong to eliminate possibility of such error in the future. 8). No process existed to resolve close ethical calls. When Leeson broke the law by engaging in a unethical behavior at the bar, the
Appendix A.2 also lists several factors that could provide opportunities for management/employees to commit fraud. One factor that could lead to fraud is if, “There is ineffective monitoring of management as a result of: domination of management by a single person or small group without compensating controls.” The auditors should have taken notice of the lack of controls and segregation of duties with respect to Phar-Mor’s
In the case study of “The Purchased Paper,” a working college student named Edgar Allen has a dilemma: he believes his only option is to choose between going to college and having a job. At first glance, anyone might agree that his hands are tied, but by studying his behaviour using methods adapted by authors Skip Downing and Stephen Covey, it is easy to tell that Edgar not only has more options than he thinks, but is also playing a victim when it comes to personal responsibilities.
ETHICAL ISSUE STATEMENT: Did Burlington allow one individual, Marvin Brown, to make an unethical business decision to retaliate against employee Sheila White?
authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised
Ultimately, Knapp had the opportunity to commit this heinous act because of his unreasonable financial position and power in the organization. Robert’s duties included authorizing and distributing checks, which led to the opportunity to commit the crime. The clear lack of separation of duties was tremendous and indefensible by
- They did not manage their money properly. Without a specific funding plan, they quickly burn out the money they raised even before they fulfilled the need of $1.5 million.
Potential for misstatement & fraud: Compliance with the established procedures and controls were found to be ineffective. The fraud reporting process, technically put in place does not serve its intended purpose. The ineffective control environment has created an attitude and tone across the company where errors and inappropriate behavior may be seen as acceptable, thus creating opportunity for concealing fraud and potential misstatements.
9. What types of fraudulent activities could Barb have perpetrated? Do you think it is possible that Barb did not commit fraud? Why?
According to the internal inspection report of the Societe Generale, certain control was absented throughout a period of time. This absent of certain control indicated that a fraud is occurred and alerted the company about it. However, even though Societe Generale is able to identify the problem, the compliance inspector of the company only conducted a routine reviews and did not have a deep detail checking on issues. Besides, the compliance inspector did not asking for any additional information from Kerviel and simply accepted Kerviel’s claims without putting any effort to validate it. Due to this, its shows that the compliance inspector of the bank is failed to identify the cause of the problems occurred which caused by the lack of
acted knowingly and purposely. . .” Sections 45-2-203 did not allow the jury to consider that
You recently graduated and just started employment at the New York office of one of the Big Four
Throughout history there have been many successful companies as well as companies that have been a debacle. The success of the company has to do with the management and how it executes its strategy. If the management is ineffective, the company will most likely fail; however, if the company has good management it is more likely to prosper. There are many responsibilities that a manager must complete, chief among them are the four functions of management are planning, organizing, leading, and controlling (PowerPoint). In order for the company to be successful the management must fulfill all four functions. In some case not all four functions are met to expectation, with the results that the company to be not as successful as it could be if they
MGT 615 Radio Shack Case Page 3 of 5 3. Do you think the board’s decision to fire Edmondson was “tough” as Len Roberts suggested? Why or why not? Why do you think Mr. Roberts would have described this decision as such? The board’s decision to fire Edmondson was “tough,” as Len Roberts suggested, but in terms of ethics it is not at all tough decision, because Edmondson’s behavior violates the company’s ethics and morality. Not only
This research paper will explore the fraud at Tyco and focus primarily on accounting and auditing issues related to the fraud. One thing worth noting about this case is that fraudulent financial reporting was not at the core of the fraud, which was the case with majority other big frauds at the time, such as Enron and Waste Management. On the contrary, fraud consisted of misappropriation of assets, and fraudulent financial reporting came as a consequence of trying to hide misappropriation of assets and the use of corporate money for personal benefit.
Although Mr. Stonecipher was unable to live up to his duties of keeping Boeing out of the “ethical spotlight” and setting the standard for his employees to follow, the Boeing board of directors did just that. By requiring Mr. Stonecipher to tender his resignation they