Role of Criminology in Determining the Emerging Patterns of Corporate Crime

3821 Words15 Pages
How Criminology has sought to explain Corporate Crime? Abstract Throughout the past years, there has been a growing propensity in criminology to explain emerging patterns of corporate crime within the United States by referring solely to different things like dysfunctional families or dysfunctional persons. Other criminologists have really interrogated these latter methods as separating individuals and crime from the social organizations that cover them. This paper will discuss how criminology has pursued to explain exactly what corporate crime has become. How Criminology has sought to explain Corporate Crime? Introduction In criminology, corporate crime denotes to crimes that are done either by a corporation (a business unit having a separate legal character from the natural persons that achieve its actions), or by individuals acting on behalf of a corporation or other business entity. White Collar crime is a quickly arising topic in the field of criminal justice. Recently, it has just been dubbed very popular with cases that are high-profile like the companies of Enron and Martha Stewart. In the book, Controversies in White Collar Crime by Gary W. Potter, author of the book thinking about Crime Professor James Q. Wilson, "discharges the significance of white collar crime". He makes the point that four different views of why white collar crime is not considered "real" corruption or should be taken as life-threatening as the so called conventional crime that goes on

More about Role of Criminology in Determining the Emerging Patterns of Corporate Crime

Open Document