Role of Globalization in Modern Economy

That this was also the decade in which globalization came into full swing is more than a minor inconvenience for its advocates” (Rodrick). If globalization is supposed to present an advantage to developing countries, why have there been so many setbacks? Indeed, both sides will have its winners and losers regardless of which side of the development coin they live on, but for the most part globalization has lifted millions out of poverty, improved the standard of living, and increased life expectancy rates all while keeping developed nations relatively competitive to their developing counterparts. Globalization’s value is that it seeks to create an economic equilibrium in the world, where parties are free from barriers and can benefit from one another through a more efficient allocation of resources. This allows all participating nations to contribute to an integrated economy and where all nations willing to embrace globalization have the potential to benefit. Regardless, the path to successful integration to the global economy has not always been easy. There is contention towards globalization as some argue that it is detrimental to developed nations, while many developing countries that were forced to hastily open up their markets and integrate failed. However, if implemented properly, globalization has proven that it can benefit all parties involved and that the potential gains outweigh the losses.

"Globalization" is a term that came into popular usage in the 1980 's to describe the increased movement of people, knowledge and ideas, and goods and money across national borders that has led to increased interconnectedness among the world 's populations, economically, politically, socially and culturally. Although globalization is often thought of in economic terms (i.e., "the global marketplace"), this process has many social and political implications as well. Many in local communities associate globalization with modernization (i.e., the transformation of "traditional" societies into "Western" industrialized ones). At the global level, globalization is thought of in terms of the challenges it poses to the role of governments in international affairs and the global economy

In theory, globalization should help contribute to the equality of the global economy. Yet this is not the case in reality. Globalization contributes to unsustainable prosperity for a very small percentage of the world’s population. For those in developing countries, it is especially unsustainable. The resources in these areas are consumed at an unstable rate and the environment given very little consideration. The workers are treated as if they are expendable. The smaller economies of these countries are vastly taken advantage of. For these reasons, globalization contributes to sustainable prosperity to a small extent.

There is good evidence that globalization has resulted in a considerable increase in world trade over the past 20-30 years. Costa (2008) claims that the globalization makes services, goods, people and ideas move throughout the world more easily. He also maintains that cross-border world trade will play a more and more significant role in global GDP. By 2017, it will approximately occupy 15 percent. Nevertheless, Lin Y. (2006) argues that the globalization also has serious drawbacks. He considers that globalization does harm to both developed and developing countries. Through globalization, few people in developing countries gets benefit. Most of them are still as poor as before because the change of there is so tiny. He also claims that although

In today’s society the amount of technological and all around global advancements that have been made within a mere decade are astonishing, let alone what has yet to be constituted. Although not only the United States, but the entire world has globalized, it’s been proven that first world countries have an advantage in being able to heighten themselves quickly, opposed to third world countries that trail behind. Former U.S. Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, stated, “What is called globalization is really just another name for the dominant role of the United States” (Prompt), proving that globalization sets a fine line between the perks of those fortunate enough in a capitalistic nation and those who are not.

Supporters of globalization argue that it has the potential to make this world a better place to live in and solve some of the deep-seated problems like unemployment and poverty. But the opponents general complaint about globalization is that it has made the rich richer while making the non-rich poorer. “It is wonderful for managers, owners and investors, but hell on workers and nature.”

The concept of globalization is one of the most talked about terms over the past decades. In fact, it is a highly popular buzzword that admittedly lacks a standard or commonly agreed upon definition. (Trebilcock, 2000). The concept of economic globalization stemmed from the root concept of “globalization” and by definition, pertains to that specific attribute of globalization that refers to the process of integration between the economic front and the ‘developed’, ‘under-developed’ and ‘developing’ economies (Naik, 2011). Economic globalization essentially comes together through international trade, FDIs (foreign direct investments) and the like (Naik, 2011).

“Globalization increases poverty” is a typical statement created by critics of globalization. In the past century, a substantial number of developing countries have struggled with economic growth. Globalization plays an essential role in the economy as it assists in elevating the GDP of the country in questions and consequently leading to the diminished poverty level. This research seeks to address the following fundamental concepts/ questions: what impact does globalization has in developing countries in matters pertaining poverty reduction? The paper's structure is as follows. The first section outlines the definition of globalization. The second section evaluates technological advancement through reduction of poverty on globalization. The third section explains the essential meaning of trade liberalization and the influence on development in Periphery countries. The fourth section presents foreign direct investment linkage in globalization and poverty. The fifth section explores the processes of development motives. The sixth section presents a case study that is primarily connected to globalization impact on developing countries. Lastly, the seventh section explains the impact of globalization on economic policy on developing economies.

Globalization is the proximate and multidimensional set of political, economic, social, and technological integration around the globe. The increasing interconnectedness among countries can be seen through the prism of globalization. Essentially, the lives of people living in distant cities like Bangalore and Silicon Valley are brought closer as a result of this phenomenon. Drivers of this adjacent include; the expansion of trade, technological exchange, labor movement and investments (Stearns 2017). The discourse of globalization encompasses several multidisciplinary themes. The paper, however, concentrates on the economic factors, “which, entails the closer economic integration of countries of the world through increased flow of goods, services, capital and even labor.” (Stiglitz 2007: 4). The paper focuses on economic globalization and elucidates whether the globalization has reduced poverty and inequality or had reproduced the reversed implications. Meanwhile, the paper reveals if the developing world has benefited from the set. This seems to be the central question that policymakers, development economists, and politicians have been grappling with for years. The paper is presented in three parts. Part one reflects on the historical context of the problem statement. The second part compiles literature and juxtaposes with cases to corroborate the globalization-poverty-inequality triangle. Finally, the conclusion represents the author’s viewpoint on the

Globalization continues to dominate conversation and research as a globally influential trend. Identities influence how people interact with the world, including policy and conflict; seeing the impact globalization has will be beneficial. Existing literature looks at the interaction globalization has with ethnic conflicts, and some identities, but most tend to aggregate a multidimensional term into one measure.

Globalization is everywhere. Globalization is defined as “a process of greater interdependence among countries and their citizens.” (Carbaugh, 2009, p.2) It consists of increased integration of product and resource markets across nations via trade, immigration, and foreign investment- that is, via international flows of goods and services, of people, and of investment such as equipment, factories, stocks, and bonds. Globalization is driven by technological change and the liberalization of trade and opening up of the markets. Globalization has given a rise to multinational companies.

Globalization is a difficult word to define, simply because it means many different things to many different people. In general, however, globalization refers to the fact that world economies and cultures have become increasingly integrated over the past two or three decades. More specifically, the world has seen a significant increase in the flow of goods through international trade, access to foreign financial capital, movement of human capital across borders, and the transfer of technology, information, and cultural symbols. Developing countries, ones in which the majority of people lives on far less money and with far fewer basic public services than the population in highly industrialized ones, have become much more integrated in to the world economy as a result of this complex process. In what follows, this paper will first provide a brief overview of globalization. Subsequently, it will examine both the theoretical and actual effects of globalization on developing countries. The primary areas of focus will be financial integration and access to global capital, trade openness and GDP, the effects of foreign direct investment and government ideologies on income inequality, and emigration. I argue that although economic theory and research suggest that increased access to foreign capital and trade openness may be beneficial to the overall economic growth of developing countries, the effects of globalization at the level of human capital and well-being, such as on

It is fair to say that the ones who benefit the most in economic globalization are developed countries whose social productive forces are highly developed ((El-Ojeili, C. & Hayden, P., 2006.). However, it is difficult for developing countries that are relatively

In all these developments, there is the underlying assumption that globalization is good for all and that its benefits are shared out (even if not equally) all over the world. The more developed countries benefit while the least developed countries tend to remain impoverished and do not share in the benefits.

In today’s world, with a few notable exceptions, nearly everyone in every region of the world has access to the same products, information and services. A long-distance relationship is no longer so distant, since each party involved in the relationship can communicate through Skype, Facebook or through any of the vast amount of social media available. A person in Easter Island, one of the most remote inhabited islands in the world, can go to the other side of the world and travel to Canada. An economic crisis in Argentina could affect the economic landscape in Brazil. A person in Chile or Peru can buy an Abercrombie and Fitch t-shirt because this transnational corporation decided to expand its market to developing countries, or as you might prefer, to emerging economies in South America. Although many of these examples might be trivial, these are the consequences of globalization.