Role of Political Clubs on Frnech Revolution

The revolution emphasized the ideals of “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” and was characterized by the strong will of the French people who stood up for what they believed in. It was also an extremely

Beginning in 1789, the French Revolution was a time of rebellion, passion, betrayal, death, violence, and perseverance. Before 1789, King Louis XVI was taxing his poorest people heavily, whilst the rich were hardly taxed at all. The socioeconomic system in place at the time, known as the ancien regime, ruthlessly upheld the status quo. When the tension in France rose to a boiling point, fiery, young rebels to rose up against the Monarchy, the Ancien Regime, and the Clergy. These revolutionaries desperately wanted change, and they had three main principles around which their movement centered: Liberté, Égalité, and Fraternité. Liberty is the freedom to do as one pleases so long as one’s actions do not unjustifiably harm others. Equality is being considered the same. Fraternity is a sense of brotherhood and companionship. The goals of the French Revolution were initially achieved with alacrity, however they were abandoned with relative quickness as malcontented leaders quested for, and abused, power and authority.

With all of the chaos and commotion going on with the Revolution, a sense of victory without the people was impossible. Robespierre once said, "The domestic danger comes from the bourgeois; to defeat the bourgeois we must rally the people." This concept helped to create a defense policy that rested on the Sansculottes and the middle bourgeoisie, this of which Robespierre became that symbol (Soboul 56). The Jacobins and Sansculottes forced this revolutionary of national defense upon the French leadership and upper class. This is where Robespierre 's villainous side begins to emerge. Upon implementation of this strategy, overthrow and mass executions began to appear.

Jacobins= Republican radicals led by a new generation of revolutionaries Robespierre, Danton, Marat, and Duke of Orleans (Philippe

The French Revolution is often seen as a bloody mess. Just like most other revolutions, in the in exchanged an authoritarian regime for an authoritarian regime. The ideas of the revolution changed the human history around the world. The French Revolution started on July 14,1789 the revolution had many flaws but it the end it was still successful. Before the revolution third 3rd estate was burdened with taxes while the 1st and 2nd didn’t have to do anything.

Robespierre created the Committee of Public Safety. Anyone who was considered enemy of the revolution had the tendency to be arrested, thousands of people died, the period from 5 September 1793 to 28 July 1794 was denominated Reign of Terror, the whole nation was mobilized for war, any invading army was defeated, the citizens started feeling increasingly insecure. The Jacobins did not accept any criticism; they were isolated from society, lost the support of the sans-culottes and attracted the rage of the bourgeoisie and the marsh. It was considered

The Reign of Terror was a period of violence that succeeded the beginning of the French Revolution; it was caused by conflict between two rival political parties, and tens of thousands were executed by guillotine on account of being ‘enemies of the revolution’. The French Revolution started with the storming of the Bastille, and since then the government had been in a state of constant turmoil. Civil war broke out in multiple regions and various foreign countries started attacking France on all sides; a man named Maximilien Robespierre, who belonged to a radical group known as the Jacobins, saw his chance and seized the government along with his fellow extremists. The Jacobins felt that “it was their duty to preserve the revolution, even if it meant violence and terror” which

The revolution resulted, among other things, in the overthrow of the Bourbon monarchy in France and in the establishment of the First Republic. It was generated by a vast complex of causes, the most important of which were the inability of the ruling classes of nobility, clergy, and bourgeoisie to come to grips with the problems of state, the indecisive nature of the monarch, impoverishment of the workers, the intellectual ferment of the Age of Enlightenment, and the example of the American Revolution. Recent scholarship tends to downplay the social class struggle and emphasize political, cultural, ideological, and personality factors in the advent and unfolding of the conflict. The Revolution itself produced an equally vast complex of

The extraordinary intensification of the ‘Reign of Terror’ and Maximillian de Robespierre’s dictatorship caused him to loose numerous followers. Subsequently, members of the Revolutionary government started suspecting Robespierre’s motives, as there were no more threats from enemies outside the country. Soon, he called for another purge and he was believed to be threatening members of the Committee of Public Safety. The Jacobins grew tired of his reckless actions and in that moment Cambon rose in the Convention and said, "…It is time to tell the whole truth. One man alone is paralyzing the will of the Convention. And that man is Robespierre." He gained followers immediately and so a group of moderates and revolutionaries formed together to justify Robespierre’s ruthless actions and soon it was decided to overthrow him and his

There are many reasons for the late edification of the French people after the Revolution had started, one of these being that the more educated people saw the anger of the poor as an opportunity to justify the total reform of their presently corrupt government. So, what we have are these secret societies that would meet together and essentially philosophize about what basic human rights are, and the role of a government in protecting those rights.

In the French Revolution there was a loosely knit political faction known as the Girondists or Girondins. They were a part of the Jacobin movement but, not every Girondin was a part of the Jacobins. The Girondins were very active in the Legislative Assembly and the National Convention in 1791 through 1793. In their Legislative Assembly they represented democratic revolution in France. They also supported patriotic defiance against European powers. The Girondins also had an aggressive foreign policy. In 1792 through 1793 the Girondins constituted the war party. They did this when France commenced a series of revolutionary wars with other European countries. Brissot, a Jacobin club member, showed a military plan that would spread their revolution

The French Revolution pitted the Monarchy against the Revolutionaries in a power struggle, but even within the Revolutionary’s group, there were several subgroups vying for power such as, the Girondists (Girondins?) and the Jacobins. The Girondists were the moderate political party and wanted limited democracy for Revolutionary France, whereas, the Jacobins were the radical party that wanted pure democracy for France (Gallant 123) [cite this way?]. Both groups, however, wanted freedom from the dictatorial rule of the Monarchy and the Estate System (capitalized?) that controlled France before the Revolution took place. The Estate System split the citizens of France into three different groups: the First Estate with 10,000 people and the most power, the Second Estate with 400,000 people and moderate power, and the Third Estate with 25 million people and the least power. (Gallant 111) The unfair burdens placed upon the citizens of the Third Estate soon led to the French Revolution in July of 1789, in which democracy and equal rights were sought. At first the Girondists won the governmental spot, but this power struggle eventually led to the Jacobins to gain leadership from 1793-1794. During their short but impactful rule, there were several different types of propaganda that the Jacobins used as political policies to

The historiography of the French Revolution changed drastically when the neo-liberals challenged the claims made by Furet alongside with other colleagues. Unlike the revisionist of the early period, interpretations made by the neo-liberals did little to minimize the 18th century nobility and their oppressive characteristics. The aristocracy has political interest in opposing the lower classed Parisians. Their argument was that the Constitutional Assembly period fundamentally indifferent that was Furet considered the Jacobinism of the Terror to be. The nonsensical violence that was previously disavowed by the liberal revisionists is now brought in being necessary for the establishment of a free state. In the research archived by the neo-liberal historians, their collective conclusion was that the French Revolution in its entirety was a failure. According to them, the revolution may not have been started by a rising bourgeoisie, but the revolutionaries did manage to subdue the monarchy and possibly bring the 19th century state into a refashioned liberal state. The neo-liberals had a different breakup of the class and sorted them according to their professions and occupations. The jobs varied by social interest, so it seemed that putting them within solid political groups would have proved little in the long run. These historians stress a lot

The Jacobins proposed borrowing money from the rich to equip armies, the Girondins did not accept. Therefore the sans-culottes stormed the convention and arrested the Girondins deputies; ergo the power was now in the hands of the Jacobins. The counter revolution progressed; royalists and Girondins encouraged rebellions against the Convention. One of the main Jacobins figures, Marat (a doctor and journalist) was murdered in his bath. The Jacobins knew that the revolution could only be saved if they had popular support; therefore they created plenty of social

The French Revolution (1789-1814) was a period that affected the outcome of world history tremendously. This is considered a major turning point in European history which has led to dramatic changes in France and other regions of the world. Various social and political issues led to the start of the revolution. Politically, France suffered under the rule of Louis XVI, who ruled by absolute monarchy. Many people had their natural rights renounced and weren’t able to have a political voice. Socially, France had divided its population within 3 estates (classes). French citizens took it upon themselves to remodel their country 's’ political structure. The French Revolution had encountered both positive and negative effects. However, many Europeans viewed the Revolution as much more than just a bloody massacre. The French Revolution was used to demonstrate new ideology that would emphasize the principles of liberty and equality throughout Europe.