Roles Of Women In Ww2

Under the ground combat exclusion policy, it is stated that “Service members are eligible for all positions for which they are qualified, except that women shall be excluded from assignment” (McSally 1011). Along with the policy, there are certain other regulations and restrictions, such as how the physical component of the policy is restricted to males (McSally 1011). In an attempt to terminate the ground combat exclusion policy, a civil lawsuit was filed by Haring against the ground combat exclusion policy by arguing that it is “unconstitutional because the policy bats women from specific jobs based on their sex” (Dreazen 1). While this primarily affects women, it could impact the troop’s performance as a whole. Although the law remains to be in place today, it is not nearly as strict as it once was (Spencer A.15). Beginning in the 1970s, women who wanted to serve in the United States armed forces were separated from the military once they became pregnant (Murnane 1061). It wasn’t until the case of Crawford v. Cushman when the law was repealed because it violated the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause (Murnane 1061). As time has progressed, tension within majority of policies in place have loosened, but that doesn’t quite mean that they have become nonexistent.

On September 3rd 1939 World War II started in Europe. During World War II, more than 16 million American men served in the military. While this large portion of the population was overseas fighting for the United States, women had to do many of the jobs in America normally held by men. Women were considered vital assets to the war effort, and the American government made sure to use their skills and labor in many different areas to win the war. Women contributed to the successful war effort by working society, documenting the war effort, and supporting the soldiers.

The role of women was extremely important for America during WW2 and were appreciated for their hard work, but not for ever. On the home front many of “ the people of this community respected women who work [ed] regardless of the type of work.” (Women Working at the Home Front). The women were respected by the people because they showed that a women, no matter the job, could also help with the fight, except without a gun. Women were determined to perform the job as long as they needed to and some enjoyed their newly found jobs, but they knew that “some jubilant day [they] will stay home again.” The companies who hired women to replace the men who went off to war appreciated what the women did, but as soon as the men come back, their appreciation

For years women were not adequate to serve in the military however now they can be any rank, however some can be affected by someone of a different gender battling alongside each other. As an illustration, Molly M. Ginty article “All Guts, No Glory” states many times a women soldiers gave their lives, yet never were their acts of bravery acknowledged. Eventually, women were given more advanced roles in the military, before any of this they could only serve as piolets or nurses. Subsequently, about 53 percent of the military is women rather they are on reserve or new recruits, these women are serving their country by their own choice. By the way, some of these women are in the combat area, which I personally thing if anyone want to do combat

There has been no better growth in the United States history than the period between the beginning of World War I and the end of World War II, where leaders and reforms in the nation shaped America as we know it today. Among Americans who experienced this period of trial and growth were women. The First World War brought about a series of positive changes within the United States, which would dramatically change the lives of women through the end of WWII, generating employment, suffrage, freedoms, and an importance to society.

World War II began in 1939, when Britain declared war on Germany for their drastic attempt to invade Poland. Australia joined soon after, determined to protect their country as well as the United Kingdom’s soldiers. Thousands of Australian men laid down their lives to help keep their country safe while millions of women – single and married – fretted over the many soldiers away from home. In 1940, women decided to rally together to create a handful of military-based organisations such as the Australian Women’s Land Army (AWLA), Women’s Auxiliary Australian Air Force (WAAAF), Australian Women’s Army Service (AWAS) and Women’s Royal Australian Naval Service (WRANS). These organisations enlisted over 550 000 women Australia-wide re-enforcing

For soldiers, women being in the military has been a common thing. But females being in combat units is rare. Female soldiers deal with male soldiers hassling them around about the fact. Women should be able to have the same rights as men do. Just because we are more “sensitive” and “emotional”.

According to government records, there were 22,000 women in uniform when World War II ended and there were some 120,000 on active duty during the Korean War. Roughly one-third of them were health care providers. Female patriots volunteered for service in the Women's Army Corps (WAC), Women in the Air Force (WAF), Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service of Navy Women's Reserves (WAVES), and Women Marines. Those who were medical personnel served in Korea in Mobile Army Surgical Hospitals (MASH units), onboard hospital ships, in MEDEVAC aircraft, and in hospitals in Japan, Hawaii, and the USA that were receiving the wounded from Korea.

In the article All Guts, No Glory it explains how women were not allowed to be classified as in combat soldiers regardless of what job was assigned. Generalizing women as delicate and almost as liabilities in the armed forces kept them in inferior ranks as well as having insufficient combat training. That not only endangered them but fallen male soldiers making it so women were unable to help bring them to safety. Sargent Rebekah brings up the point stating “From push-ups and drills of basic training

Throughout time women have gone to war along-side their male counterparts without any question as to what role they couldn’t play but rather what contributions they brought with them. History shows that women have played a vital role in military combat and have been very successful filling any role that their male equivalent has played during combat. Military women have led armies into battle, marched as soldiers on to the front line, have lie in wait for the perfect ambush as snipers, acted as spies to obtain vital information for their cause, and placed themselves in harm’s way to protect

Women have been enlisted in the armed forces since June 12, 1948, when President Truman signed the Woman’s Armed Services Integration Act. Throughout this time, women have served several different roles; however, women were not allowed to serve in combat forces. Arguments offer the idea that women are physically and emotionally capable of performing the same as men, Researchers have proven that only a small percentage of women are capable of performing the physically demanding aspects as that of men, although there are a select few women that are capable of completing the qualification standards to join the combat forces. With that being said women should be allowed to fight on the front lines.

Many argue that women won’t be able to handle the requirements needed to be able to go into combat and lack the muscle as well. Standards can’t be lowered for women and most aren’t able to make the cuts. “Those who are capable are going to rise to the challenge,”states Chief Warrant Officer Raquael Patrick of the Army ( motherjones.com). Even though the standards are high, the women who do reach them respectively earned their place and have proven that they are capable of serving in combat as much as guys are.

The topic of women in combat is an ongoing debate that is currently being argued in many places, commonly in the United States. Women in combat next to men and a free women combat are two different perspectives in which women in combat are defined by their gender. Women in combat will provide help to those men who are to attend a combat. A free-women combat, on the other hand, prevents women from dying during combat due to not being allowed in combat. Since Women aren’t able to be included in any job in the military and have a right to be equally treated like men in combat, it’ll be unfair to more people. Women should be given the same right as men out in battlefields because “women serving in the armed forces has not wavered as warfare has changed, a clear sign that the necessity of women serving in combat is recognized.” In addition, “several other countries outside the U.S. already have women serving on the front lines.” Lastly, “Combat is nothing new to our women in the military. Several women have already given their lives serving in combat.” Women have, over the years, worked hard to get awarded the choice towards their career. Although it prevents more deaths, it’s also a sexist matter. Any job in the military should be a choice for women, it’s their career after all and they can make their own decisions.

Society has built a stereotype that says women are inherently weaker than men. This has limited women’s chances to get ahead, but people are not standing idly by instead they are pushing for women to get equal opportunity. Some of these advancements are that women now have the right to vote, to own their property, and get jobs. However, not all jobs are available to women such as combat positions in the military. Combat positions or chances on the front line are unavailable to women because they are depicted as fragile and in need of protection. Women deserve the opportunity to try to gain their placement on the front line because women can be just as strong as men and they are willing to fight.

Ninety percent of all military occupations in the military include all genders, but the top ten percent of roles are excluded to women. Women have already felt the misogyny with unequal pay and unfair treatment by men, now women have to face the discrimination for fighting for our country. Women should be able to serve in the front lines because it makes the military stronger as a whole with more diversity, women in other countries fight on the front lines and women have made significant contributions in the military so far.