The Roman Republic became one of the most powerful and ruthless Empire 's on the face of the planet and to be a citizen was very appealing. This was such an admirable and highly sought after position; that it would cause envy throughout the people of that time. There were also 'pre-requisites ' recorded in the requirements of becoming a Roman citizen and keeping that role. Roman citizenship itself was originally difficult to obtain but once won, life as a citizen was easier and more refined than the 'lowly freemen '.
There was a complex set of rules to be taken into account when it came to granting Roman citizenship to the people. Even the birth of a child to a citizen was not always a guarantee of citizenship as the role of the father
…show more content…
This step was one of the most effective political tools and (at that point in history) original political ideas (perhaps one of the most important reasons for the success of Rome). (Internet Wikipedia Encyclopaedia 'nod ').
Citizens would be referred to as Romans whereas non-citizens were referred to as slaves or babari, it was a ruthless time and the residents of the Empire were roughly divided into classes:Slaves were considered property and had only certain very limited rights as granted by stature. They could essentially be sold, tortured, maimed, raped and killed at the whim of their owners. It was the exceptional feature of ancient Rome that almost all slaves freed by Roman owners (freedman) automatically received Roman citizenship.
The natives who lived in territories conquered by Rome, citizens of Roman client states and Roman allies could be given a limited form of Roman citizenship such as the Latin Right. This amounted essentially to a second-class citizenship within the Roman state. The Latin Right is the most widely known but there were many other of such Rights.
A Roman citizen enjoyed the full range of benefits that flowed from his status. A citizen could, under certain exceptional circumstances, be deprived of his citizenship.
Women were a class apart whose status in Roman society varied tremendously over
The Roman Republic included leaders that were elected by citizens and the power was spread among several groups. To make the Roman democracy become a republic, they added 300 senators. By adding 300 senators, they were able to control the treasury, they could serve for life, and they were chosen by consuls. The difference between Greek democracy and the Roman Republic is that Greek democracy refers to the direct participation and responsibility of Athenian citizens in decision making, while Roman Republic refers to the governance of the state. A similarity between Greek democracy and Roman Republic is that both systems allowed for some amount of input from all or most of the male citizens of the society. The Roman Republic is better because men, women, and foreigners were all considered as citizens and in the Greek democracy, women were not considered as citizens and were not allowed to vote. Overall, the Roman Republic was known as a republic because of its
One reason that the system of citizenship in Rome was better was who was able to be a citizen they considered almost every human to be a citizen except slaves. One example of this is in document A when it tells us that all men, women, and children were able to be citizens. His evidence helps explain that Rome had a stronger system because when they let more people
One reason that the system of citizenship in Rome was better was because they care for foreigners. In Doc. F it states, "The Senate had primary responsibilities for foreigners." In Doc. F it states, "The Senate had primary responsibilities for foreigners.
The Roman citizens had more rights than Athenian Citizens. In Document C, it said that
By around 500 BC, the new idea of citizenship began to take shape. The people of an empire were no longer referred to as subjects, but as citizens. These people were given certain rights, but along with these rights came responsibilities as well. Although both the Romans and Athenians had citizens, they had different outlooks on what an individual’s right and responsibilities were. Athens’ system for citizenship was better than that of Rome’s because all citizens were given equal right, their government was built by the poor, they protected their democracy.
Rome recognizes that the basis of their wealth is on the shoulders of the lesser. Granting foreigners citizenship is not only fair, but strengthens the foundation of Rome to make it a better
In the 6th century, there were two different classes in the Roman Empire: patricians and plebeians. The patricians had made up 5 to 7 percent of the population all the while controlling the army, senate, and the consoles. Plebeians on the other hand, can vote but could not serve other positions. They also couldn’t intermarry with the patricians, they were told to pay heavy taxes, and forced into the army to fight in wars. Because of this, they were angry, and they didn’t know their rights.
Rome was a civilization that expanded their empire by getting new citizens from conquered civilizations and giving them limited citizenships in Rome by them some responsibilities of a regular Roman citizen. There were four types of Roman citizens: Latini were people on the Italian peninsula, and had the right to travel, trade, and live in Rome but were not allowed to marry in Rome or the Roman empire. The Foederati were citizens of states that had treaties with Rome and were given little rights in return for military service. Peregrini were foreigners in conquered lands they could be given full or partial citizenship (doc
Rome had a better system due to the vast population, wider acceptance of citizens, and an organized Senate. It is important to include those specific attributes in an empire for organization and prevention of overpopulation. According to the background essay, citizens of a state or empire not only meant meeting certain responsibilities, but also enjoying certain rights. Citizenship is also defined as a status given by a government. In the modern world citizenship involves a balance between individual rights and responsibilities. In Rome however, the idea of a good citizen was particularly different. In contrast to modern day citizens, Roman citizens were looked upon how they acted with their family, neighbors, and property. Rome had a population
Citizenship is not a recent idea, nor it is an ancient organization of society. The idea that the ordinary person should play a role in society emerged as citizenship, and the status, given by a government to some or all people, balances individual rights and individual responsibilities to aid the government. The most predominant form of early citizenship is in Athens and Rome, in which the people of a state are known as citizens as opposed to subjects, who populate the empires in Egypt, Babylon, and China. In spite of having a similar governing system, Rome and Athens are two drastically different civilizations; their differences not only stem from the drastic difference in their population number, but also from their ideals of life. However,
Rome is known for its’ empire (The Roman Empire). Rome started out small and ended up becoming this huge and undefeatable force of nature. Rome received their success by either attacking other nearby towns/neighbors or granting them treaties or citizenships. E. Badien, the author who created an article called, The Organization Of Italy, explains how Rome organized Italy, and got their neighboring cities and nations to join them and turn ancient Italy into a leading state of power. In Badien’s observations, he finds that granting citizenship and the Latin’s helped Rome to become powerful and assisting Italy to be more structured.
The policies that the romans implemented in the republic years played a crucial role in the conquest of the Latium and the Italic peninsula. The various policies that the romans established to govern Italy is called the Roman confederation. One important policy was that Romans made felt the conquered people that they helped to succeed Rome. Some conquered people, especially the Latins, were allowed full roman citizenship; others received citizenship without the right to
family and also to be considered for Senate. The Romans did not want to waste time needlessly.
The Roman Republic was a “democratic” republic, which allowed first citizens to vote, and to choose their governors in the senate (Hence, their consuls). However, it was a nation ruled by its aristocracy, and, consequently, the entire Republic`s power was concentrated in a few individuals. Furthermore, the Senate was controlled by Patricians, which directed the government by using wealth to buy control and power over the decisions of the senate and the consuls. This situation aroused the inconformity of the people; as result, a civil war took place in the Republic (destroying it), and then the Roman Empire was born.
As a result, they often did public service. Aristocrats had it much better than the poor and they also received advantaged treatment from the imperial representatives and the courts. There were also local elites, located in other cities of the Empire, which would execute the duties of managing office, sponsoring games, erecting public buildings, and making charitable contributions. Then came the lower classes which included poor citizens, non-citizens, slaves, and former slaves called freedmen. "The working masses who toiled with their hands in the fields and towns represented the largest segment of the population during the empire, but not all of the lower classes were manual laborers ." Doctors, musicians, actors, teachers, and even philosophers fell into the lower classes, and so did craftspeople. Then finally came the lowest class which was made up of slaves. When the Romans conquered the Mediterranean, they enslaved millions of people and brought them to Italy. These slaves labored on the large plantations or in the houses and workplaces of wealthy citizens. Roman law was inconsistent on slavery. Slaves were considered property; they had no rights and they were submitted to the demands of their owners. However, they had legal standing as witnesses in courtroom proceedings, and they could eventually gain freedom and citizenship. Slaves could also save money to purchase their freedom. Frequently, masters would free loyal slaves in appreciation for