preview

Roman Political Rights

Better Essays

Historian Henrik Mouritsen notes, “Political rights do not exist in a vacuum, but are embedded in social and economic structures which determine the extent to which they can be realized in practice.” The constitution of the Roman republic, a civilization in ancient Rome that lasted from 509 to 27 BCE, laid out the three main sources of power: the magistrates, the senate, and the people in the assemblies. Magistrates included all elected or appointed public officials, from rulers to party planners; the senate consisted of prior consuls and aristocrats who advised the magistrates and assemblies; the assemblies of people elected public officials and voted for laws. Each of the three branches was intended to keep the other in check, with the …show more content…

Large groups of the people were completely excluded from the process, and even among those technically included in political life, only a small fraction was able to truly participate. In order to even have a right to participate in Roman politics, one needed to be, at a minimum, an adult male citizen, barring the majority of Romans from political life. Further, the working classes were practically excluded from this number, as political proceedings were extremely time consuming, and the lower and middle classes had to work for food and could not afford to spend their time in politics. Political proceedings in Rome took several hours. Explaining the lower class’s support for populare Roman statesman Gaius Marius, ancient historian Sallust writes around 40 BCE, “Finally the commons were so excited that all the craftsmen and farmers, whose prosperity and credit depended on the labour of their own hands, left their work and attended Marius, regarding their own necessities as less important than his success.” Sallust clearly indicates here that political engagement among the lower classes was an abnormality, and that usually the common people would be …show more content…

Roman society was one based upon connections, both through contracts and carefully crafted relationships. The poor were forced to find powerful men to protect and aid them in exchange for their loyalty, which formed the basis for this system of dependence and support. Historian Matthias Gelzer explains, “the most powerful man was he who by virtue of his clients and friends could mobilize the greatest number of voters.” The importance of connections in Roman politics is further highlighted by a letter written in 65 BCE by Quintus Tullius Cicero to his brother Marcus Tullius Cicero, explaining to him strategies to be elected consul. Quintus advises his brother as to the importance of making friends with all classes and doing favors for people. Quintus also goes on to note that there are a few key influential people who Marcus would need to have on his side if he wanted a shot at winning and to warn him of the bribery his fellow candidates will inevitably use, calling it “the chief plague spot of our state.” Quintus’ referencing just a few key influential people Marcus needed to win over is further evidence of the scholarly consensus that the true power was held by the few established landowning noble families of

Get Access