Romanov Dynasty Research Paper

In 1917 the Russian revolution had began, this was the biggest factor in the fall of the Romanov dynasty. The white Russians arrested the tsarist and abdicated him from his throne putting Nicholas and his family on house arrest and he was no longer known as the Tsar, replacing him with a Bolshevik government. The red Russians had captured Nicholas and his family causing a civil war between the white and red Russians. In July 1918 Lenin and his red Russian squad had won the civil war, and shot Nicholas and his family, leaving Russia a communist country until the 1990’s.

With over a century of military and civil discontent the Romanov Dynasty was bound to fall sooner or later. The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was a result of long-term causes including Tsar Alexander’s inability to satisfy his people and Tsar Nicholas II’s inability to rule to throne all together. The collapse was also an outcome of immediate causes; the effects of World War One on Russia and the 1917 revolution. All long-term and immediate cause played a crucial role in stirring the nation until Russia was clearly overdue to be overthrown.

“The power still has to be snatched from the hands of the old rulers and handed over to the revolution. That is the fundamental task. A general strike only creates the necessary preconditions; it is quite inadequate for achieving the task itself”(Trotsky). The ineffectiveness of the strikes can be found in the fact that in nearly every occasion the soldiers were ordered to shoot on the crowd, stopping the revolts and leaving the tsar as obnoxious to the situation as before. Also the peasants in the countryside suffered land-hunger due to the growth of population caused by the decreased of mortality rates. Backwardness was also caused by the “open field system”, which didn’t motivate the peasants to improve their machinery or seeding methods since their land would be taken away from them and redistributed when a member of the community died. Nicholas II was a weak, indecisive and obstinate ruler who, being very conservative and reactionary, used extensively the secret police (“Third Section”) and the army to suppress uprisings and political enemies. He alienated the intelligentsia and angered the liberals with his lack of political participation and exaggerated reliance on the Fundamental laws, which said that the tsar was appointed by god and was rightfully in charge of the country. As a response, the liberals initiated a banquet campaign that started in November 1904, and ended in January 1905 with the aim of making the tsar give

Czar Nicholas II was a very poor leader at the time. Many of his bad leadership decisions and weak skills lead to the Russian Revolution. The Czars were rich, but many Russians were very poor. The Czars took advantage of this and and made them slaves. Finally, Czar Alexander II freed them in 1905. When there were protests and many people were getting killed, he

The Romanov dynasty was the last imperial dynasty to rule Russia. During the Romanov’s reign Russia became and remained a major European power. In the beginning of 20th century the Romanov family, who had ruled Russia since the 17th century, was overthrown and the monarchy was no more. There are several reasons why this happened.

The Romanov dynasty ruled Russia for over 300 years . The eldest son of Emperor Alexander II, Tsar Nicholas II was the last Romanov ruler of Imperial Russia. Many factors have been credited to the eventual downfall of the entire Russian family, with most of them stemming from the First World War. The French Revolution over a hundred years before Nicholas’ reign had taught the European people a valuable life lesson. Middle classes could not only demand legal constitutions from their rulers but have them granted if they pushed enough. By granting these legal constitutions, monarchies across Europe had subconsciously transformed themselves into a symbol of democracy, whether they meant to or not. This was a majority. Some monarchs however,

When Alexander became Tsar, Russia was in crisis following the assassination of Alexander II. Supreme political authority was still in the hands of the Tsar, but there were immense challenges facing Alexander III as he suddenly became Tsar of the world’s largest country, covering a quarter of the world’s land surface. Although known as the ‘Russian’ Empire, it compromised a large number of ethnic groups, with the Russians making up only half the population. It was the Russians, however, who completely dominated the political and economic system.

Tsar Nicholas II’s reign was turbulent, seeing wars, revolutions, and a general sense of displeasure from the people and the government. Intellectuals were no longer content with living under an autocracy and believed that the Russian government was archaic and inefficient. Peasants spoke out against their poor living and working conditions. By 1917, Nicholas’ reign was over and the Romanov family was no longer in power.

Although Russia was still in fact in World War I; Lenin was ready to industrialize and make the country strong again. Going against all traditional ideals of the Czarist autocracy Lenin was able to get Russia to industrialize in major cities such as St. Petersburg and Moscow. The population and economy began to increase and look to be strong again; until overcrowding, unhealthy living conditions, and poverty was starting to show again, due to the underlying changes made by Lenin. The Bolsheviks had established a liberal program in which rights for freedom of speech, equality before laws, and rights of unions to organize and strike became controlled and restricted. This making Russia politically against violence and social revolution; which is not what the people of Russia wanted.

The devastating defeats that Russia faced when the nation joined in the fight of World War I brought about even higher levels disunity across the state. These defeats led to a widespread shortage of food and created widespread fear of war throughout the commoners (McCallen). The Tsar ever-increasing number of tribulations faced by the government showed the inadequacy Nicholas II had as a

Nicholas II saw himself as a bulwark against democratic progress, emphasizing the tradition of the Russian Monarchy. This is evident in the image he tried to uphold through his clothing along with the extravagant 1913 tricentenary celebration of the Romanov Dynasty in the midst of dissent. The working class were growing tired of the conservative “traditional” Russian policymaking, and the Tsar denied them any forms of democratic reform, further alienating himself from his people. The people of Russia also saw Nicholas II as a weak leader, which was emphasized by the imminent collapse of his dynasty as the only male heir he had produced was a sickly boy with hemophilia. It was easy for the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks to exploit this weak

This is because most Russians lived on the western side of Russia. The Russians farther away also felt separated from the battle, they received new slowly about it and did show much patriotic enthusiasm about it when it did arrive. During this time there were also bad harvests and food was priced very high, meaning starvation for the lower class. There economy drop also lead to high unemployment rates, especially for industrial workers. This lead to many riots and strikes throughout Russia.

  
        

      The February Revolution of 1917 was first of the two revolutions in Russia in 1917, the revolution which began the transformation of the country. As an immediate result of this revolution, Tsar Nicholas II decided to abdicate, which lead to the end of the Romanov dynasty. The Tsar was immediately replaced by the provisional government and at the same time the

The repressive Tsarist system in place in 1905 was arguably one of the most significant factors in the 1905 revolution, as much of the discontent in Russia was due to anger at Nicholas ' autocratic Tsarist government. It could be argued that the repressive Tsarist system was not the fault of Nicholas II, but instead a problem that had been in existence for decades before his reign began. For example, Nicholas ' predecessor Alexander III was also committed to the preservation of the autocracy, and arguably took steps towards repression, through Russification and censorship, in addition to the introduction of the Okhrana. Therefore, it could be argued that Nicholas was not to blame for the repressive Tsarist system or its consequences, due to the fact that it had been in existence before his reign began.

Through the 1800s and early 1900s, displeasement continued to grow as the Russian Czars resisted needed reforms for the people. Before the revolution came about, many russians were poor and many were starving. In 1900, Czar nicholas II ruled over the russian empire with absolute power. In 1904, Russia suffered very humiliating defeats in a war against Japan which lead to protest and calls to reform. After Bloody sunday, Nicholas II agreed to allow a Duma. In 1917, Czar Nicholas II was forced by the Russian people out of his throne. The people began to revolt because he wanted to continue