preview

Romantic Hero Longfellow

Good Essays
Open Document

Romantic Hero Essay Henry Wadsworth Longfellow(1807-1882) defined, what is considered today, the true Romantic hero. He associated the Romantic hero with unique characteristics. These characteristics were not found in any other type of hero. In his poem “A Psalm of Life”, Longfellow defined a Romantic hero is while the protagonist in his poem “Excelsior” gives an example of a Romantic hero. According to Longfellow the Romantic hero must be a nonconformist, a man of action, must act in the present, and above all contribute to society.
In order for a hero to be a Romantic hero, he must be an individual. One cannot follow the crowd and be a Romantic hero. Longfellow urged readers to “be not like dumb, driven cattle”(psalm of life 5. 3) and to “Be a hero in the strife!”(5. 4). Longfellow demonstrated this using “Exelsior” by making the Protagonist in …show more content…

Washington Irving, author of Rip van winkle, illustrates the Romantic hero a little differently then Longfellow. Although there are some differences, the overall impression the characters give is similar.
Washington Irving illustrated Rip, the protagonist in Rip van Winkle, as a very individualistic person, who acted in the present and initially did not contribute to society. He did not inspire others to act in the present, although he did end up achieving greatness and finding his place in society. Using Rip Van Winkle, Irving demonstrated the qualities he believed a Romantic hero must possess.
The first qulity Irving associated with a Romantic hero was being an individual. Rip clearly did not follow the social norm of men in the village. While all other men went to work, Rip, “would sit on a wet rock( Irving” or “assist a neighbor”. He was willing to help anyone but his family. If Rip had followed the crowd, he would not have had the the calling and would never have been able to go into the

Get Access