Although the two Romeo and Juliet portray the same message and similar storyline, they both have been interpreted to match their decade of movie genres. The Lurhmann is a much more modern and carefully thought film as for the Zefferelli version, he sticks mainly to the original Shakespeare’s version of ‘Romeo and Juliet’. The Balcony scene in the two films has significant dramatic and physical differences. One of which is the modernisation of the environment, the facial expressions of the characters chances the entire dialogue message from serious to a joking manner. Last point of comparison would consist of the background music and the surrounding aimed for by the directors. Zefferelli commences the balcony scene with a calm and quiet environment that intends to portray a romantic scene that allows the audience to feel the tension in the air. Luhrmann however, starts with a loud environment as Micrucio leaves the Capulet mansion. Building a playful but moderately romantic surrounding as Romeo spots the …show more content…
Diana's (Juliet, 1997) body language defies her intent towards the audience, she expresses her face as blithe and delighted. The cause of the change in the body language and facial expressions may be because it is aimed at a much wider age group, mainly consisting of the younger ages. Olivia (Juliet, 1968) acts romantic as if the situation. Leonardo (Romeo, 1997) has a natural reaction to the surrounding in the Capulet's mansion, imitating the modern world relationships with his intensity in speech. Leonard (Romeo,1968) has similar behaviour to Leonardo but still does match Leonardo's natural mannerism. "What satisfaction can though have tonight?" Quote from both Juliets in their films, but the difference is vocal tone and facial movements which changes the outcome of the dialogue. Olivia sounds as if she is shocked on what Romeo has asked but Diana seems puzzled and unsure of what to
by a camera and give the impression that there is a lot of action in
Another significant scene that was portrayed differently in the two versions was the suicide scene. Zeferelli’s version is once again almost exact to what we read in the book. Romeo sees what he perceives to be a dead Juliet lying in her family’s tomb, and distraught by the sight he drinks poison. When Juliet awakens from her sleep she finds Romeo dead, and stabs herself with his knife. In Luhrmanns version Romeo goes to the church where Juliet is laid out for her funeral. He also sees what he perceives to be a dead Juliet and drinks poison. When Juliet awakens from her sleep she finds out Romeo has swallowed poison and is dying. The main difference lies in the fact that we are led to believe that maybe he will see her awake
was the first film of Romeo and Juliet. It was produced in 1968 and it
of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and
Romeo and Juliet, written by William Shakespeare, is a tragic love story about two young lovers who are forced to be estranged as a result of their feuding families. The play is about their struggle to contravene fate and create a future together. As such, it was only a matter of time before Hollywood would try and emulate Shakespeare’s masterpiece. This had been done before in many films. Prominent among them were, Franco Zeffirelli’s 1968 “Romeo and Juliet” and Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 “William Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet.” Both films stay true to the themes of Shakespeare’s original play. However, the modernised Luhrmann film not only maintains the essence of Shakespeare’s writings, Luhrmann makes it relevant to a teenage audience. This is
Zeffirelli’s film depiction of the balcony scene is superior to Luhrmann’s film because it is truer to Shakespeare's play and has a better interpretation of the play to film. The films are similar in that it's night and Juliet looks out her balcony as Romeo leaves her house. Although the Luhrmann film depiction during the balcony scene was in a lavish house which would have never been seen during the time frame of when the play was written. There may have been lavish houses during the time the play was written, but they don’t come close to the setting in the Zeffirelli film. This plays a key role in the film seeing that the accuracy of the events of the scene help to give the viewers an enhanced feel to the original atmosphere. Another significant
Luhrman has based his version at Verona Beach; America and instead of basing it in the 16th century like Zeffirelli, he had his film based in the 20th century, with mansions, shiny cars and bright lights. While Zeffirelli paced his film in an Iambic pentameter – a traditional Shakespeare pace; Luhrman never kept his film at a solid pace. “By modernizing these aspects of the play, and reconstructing the prologue, Luhrmann creates a movie that is more interesting to the modern viewers.” ("Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet." 123HelpMe.com). As Zeffirelli may have believed famous actors would steal his show he instead hired fresh new faces to give the movie a more fresh, innocence value, But Luhrman used well known actors to play the lead roles. This worked because more people were attracted to the film by the actors.
In the play The Tragedies Of Romeo And Juliet written by Shakespeare, the film made my Zeffirelli is more closely related because of where the scene takes place. In the playwright, this scene in Act 3, Scene 5 starts off with Lady Capulet telling Lord Capulet of Juliet's reaction to her newly announced marriage. Which is the same in Zeffirelli’s film that shows the scene taking place in the stairway nearest to Juliet’s room (3.5.115-135). However this is not the way the scene starts in the other film by Luhrmann in which Lord Capulet hears of the news by walking into Juliet's room and overhearing the conversation between Juliet and her mother. Also, in the playwright the text states, “Lady Capulet enters” then later on “Capulet and Nurse enter”
William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet, was Adapted to a film in 1996 by Baz Luhrmann. Through this adaptation Luhrmann lost many of the important key facts that Shakespeare originally wrote. In Particular the Balcony scene, the first encounter between Romeo and Juliet and also the final scene lost Shakespeare’s original vision for his play. In the film the Balcony scene was done in a pool with Romeo speaking is about his love for Juliet when she walks out and they both fall into a pool.
Comparison Between Act 3 Scene 1 in Franco Zeferelli's Romeo and Juliet and in Baz Luhrman's Romeo and Juliet
William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet has been adapted into several films, but the film that properly demonstrates the mood of Act 2, scene 2 is Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 version.
The play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare is about the dilemma of choosing love over loyalty for your family. In the story Romeo and Juliet come from separate families who hate each other, but still find love in each other. They get married without telling their families and eventually the two families get into a fight which ends in Romeo getting banished from the city where Juliet lives. They have a plan for him to get back into to the city to prevent Juliet from being forced to marry another man, but it fails and ends with the suicide death of both Juliet and Romeo. Shakespeare's major theme in the text is that Love plays a major role in our lives and can heavily affect our decisions.
Romeo + Juliet is an excellent film adaptation that modernizes a Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet”, keeping the viewer entertained. The choices made by the director create senses of mystery, tension, drama and suspense that add greatly to the original play. The way Luhrmann structures the story, orders the events in a particular way and manipulates time by using contrasting pacing and flashbacks, although quite different from the play, creates a modern perspective of a Shakespeare
The scene that was most different between the play and the movie of Romeo and Juliet was how the two crossed lovers first met each other. In the play Romeo and the Montague boys find out about the Capulet party through a poor peasant who could not read the invitations. While in the movie the Capulet party is announced through a newscast over T.V. I think the director changed this so the invite can go more along with the time period of the movie. This could change how the viewers see it by making the invite less secret. Over a newscast anyone who was paying attention to the T.V. could of heard the invite. Another main difference in this scene would be Romeo and Juliet first seeing each other in the bathroom across a fish tank rather than across the ballroom in the play. This could take away from the romantic side of the two first seeing each other. In the play it seems Romeo and Juliet have more privacy when they first speak to each other. In the movie the two are getting on and off an elevator just not to be seen. This could add more suspense to the scene and make the viewers see the movie from a lofty viewpoint.
meeting at the dinner, we see how driven by passion Romeo is. After leaving the Capulet's