Romeo And Juliet Movie Comparison

Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet has been modified numerous times and has been a source of inspiration for many playwrights and directors. Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann are examples of directors that use Shakespeare’s legendary tragedy as a basis for their films.

     There are many similarities and differences between the sixties version of Romeo and Juliet and the modern version of Romeo and Juliet. It is very easy to spot these differences considering the time period each movie was set in. There are some things in the play that totally got cut from both movies. There are also some things that they added to the movies that weren’t in the play. Let us get on to the similarities and differences.

One of the elements used by the director to convey the mood is setting. In scene 2, Romeo and Juliet are not on balcony like in the original play, but instead in a courtyard. Later on, the couple falls into the pool where most of the scene occurs. Although they have some intimate moments, Romeo and Juliet are seen splashing water on each other and laughing. As a result, this evokes a playful mood because they are having fun together.

In order to compare and contrast the play to the movie,first I will discuss the play .In the play there is a character named Romeo.Lovely Romeo wanted to marry Juliet and stay with her in Verona,Italy.But

One such scene was the infamous balcony scene. Zeferelli stuck to the classical interpretation, while Luhrmann did not. In Zeferelli’s version Juliet was on the balcony outside her bedroom calling rhetorically, "Romeo, Romeo where fore art thou Romeo?" Romeo appears and climbs up the balcony, and they share a couple of small kisses before he departs. However, in Luhrmanns version of the play, events occurred slightly differently. Juliet is walking by the pool, when Romeo startles her and they both fall in the pool. Their conversation then takes place in the pool. In between getting interrupted by a nosy security guard they share several passionate kisses.

“The most filmed of all plays, ‘Romeo and Juliet’, with its universal themes… remains uniquely adaptable for any time period,” (Botnick, 2002). Directors Franco Zeffirelli (1968) and Baz Luhrman

Romeo and Juliet is a timeless story about two ill-fated lovers. Originally written by, Shakespeare, this story has been adapted by different directors who all commonly try to add their own unique twist to it. Two of the most prevalent adaptations of Romeo and Juliet have been done by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann, who have taken this love story to the big screen. Franco Zeffirelli’s movie, which was produced in 1968, is extremely authentic and stays true to Shakespeare's vision, whereas, Baz Luhrmann’s version produced in 1996, is contemporary and appeals more to younger audiences. There are various differences and a couple of similarities between Zeffirelli’s and Luhrmann’s movie versions such as the costumes, their interpretations of

In Franco Zeffirelli’s 1968 version of Romeo and Juliet, is a traditional adaptation of Shakespeare’s original Romeo and Juliet, with some variations. Baz Luhrmann directed the 1996 version, also known as the MTV Romeo † Juliet. This version is very modernized, but keeps the language intact with few changes.

Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, is one of the most well-known stories of all time and perhaps the most famous play ever. As one might expect, the play has been made into a movie many times. The 1968 version directed by Franco Zeffirelli and the 1996 version directed by Baz Luhrmann are two of the most popular films. The older version attempts to create an authentic representation of the play, while the 1996 version places a modern twist on the story. At first glance, the movies are completely different, but upon a deeper look, there are several similarities between the two. This is best demonstrated in the balcony scene.

was the first film of Romeo and Juliet. It was produced in 1968 and it

A standout amongst the most capable parts of Romeo and Juliet is Shakespeare's utilization of dialect. The characters condemnation, promise

There are many differences between the scenes in the play and in the movie. In the movie, Romeo had jumped out of the car and then ran back to Juliet’s balcony where he climbed on the garden trellis to listen for Juliet. Romeo and Juliet end up in the pool hiding from the watch guard which had came to check on Juliet because of the weird movement on the cameras. In contrast, in the play there was no mention of a pool and Juliet had warned Romeo that if he was caught by the watchmen he would be a dead man, but a watchman never went to check on Juliet. When Juliet had gave her ring to the Nurse to give to Romeo, Romeo had put it on a necklace and wore it under his clothing.

The films had their similarities such as the main character Romeo was always white in the films. Also you rarely seen Romeo’s parents. In all the films Juliet resembles the sword of death while dying next to Romeo. The nurse in all the films had the same mentality as one another. Also each author thought that Juliet was trying

Time Period: The time period in the movie of Romeo and Juliet was far more modern than in the book. In the book they got around on foot and in horse and buggy’s, but in the movie they got around in cars like when Romeo killed Tybalt they showed up in cop cars. Also when the characters would fight they used guns which made the feeling of the story very different. Another thing I noticed in the difference of time period was instead of having Capulet’s servant going and telling people of their party like it was in the book, they televised the party invite to Capulet’s party on TV in the movie.

William Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is considered one of the greatest love stories of all time. It is about two star-crossed lovers from feuding families whose hatred brings the lovers’ lives to a tragic end. Two film directors created what are now the two most popular film versions of ‘Romeo and Juliet’: the 1973 Franco Zefirelli version and the 1997 Baz Luhrmann version. However, the two different directors took completely different approaches on how to produce and direct their films - Zefirelli took a much more ‘traditional’ approach, by keeping the setting and costuming close to that in Shakespeare’s time, while Luhrmann did the opposite by modernising the setting and characters and adapt to today’s audience. By making these changes,