Romero Essay

Within Hamilton, Lin-Manuel Miranda brings history back into the present through his musical. Originally performed at The Public Theater in 2015, the musical was quickly a popular hit and made its way to Broadway. Now performed at the Richard Rodgers Theatre, Hamilton has won 11 Tony awards and multiple honors. Director Thomas Kail and lead producer Jeffrey Seller made many of the final decisions of the production, and through them Miranda’s time and investments, the musical became a success. Now, the musical functions as a public history as it revives the importance of the past, as well as redefines the ways history is made and learned through the integration of rap and hip-hop style in musical theatre.

Zombies, as we know them today, have mortified movie viewers for the last forty six years. Modern zombies first appeared in George A. Romero’s Night of the Living Dead in 1968. These zombies were the slow moving, staggering ghouls that one has seen in countless films, but in 1985, Return of the Living Dead featured a new kind of zombie, the first fast moving and talking ghoul. Both Night of the Living dead 1968 and Return of the Living Dead 1985 feature the zombie as its villain, but Return of the living dead’s fast moving, talking zombies are a more modern take on the movie monster.

For instance, “... human life is a very special possession given by God to man and that no one has the right to take it for any reason or for any cause” (8-10). Through this passage, Chavez helps the reader feel part of the conversation by referring to “God”. By referring to “God”, he opens the door to the audience's emotions allowing his words in. Then, Chavez uses the emotions he created to help explain that nonviolence only works if everyone is on board. If everyone is not on board, a situation will turn violent, leading to a conflict that only brings destruction of human life. This means that human life is more important than any other reason because God gave us the right to live. Chavez also states that “ People suffer...”( 77). Chavez intelligently used the word, suffer to tug at the audience's heart strings. This sentence helps people understand why violence is bad, people suffer. Also, Chavez makes the point that people “ … learned many years ago that the rich may have money but the poor have time” (93-94). The use of the statement above is Chavez closing remark saying that nonviolence may not be a fast alternative but everybody has time no matter what you have time. In all, Chavez's use of pathos that tug at the emotions of the audience allows them to open their hearts and understand that everyone is here for a reason no matter how small, life should not be

He refers to credible sources like God, King and Gandhi to establish a sense of reliability. For instance, “no one has the right to take it for any reason or for any cause” (Chavez). He states this to emphasize that there is only one person who can give and take away life. Chavez refers to Kings life as “an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world” (Chavez). He states this to stress how nonviolence is powerful and doesn’t cost the innocents their lives. For example, in lines 62-63 “the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change” (Chavez). Chavez refers to Gandhi when the boycotts protested for nonviolence resistance. Chavez uses ethos to give additional resources of others who think the same way he does and support

Chavez begins his rationalization reminding the audience of the vigorous efforts Dr.King displayed in his cause; comparing and contrasting violence against non violence. Chavez explicitly states violence leads to nothing more than “injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides” as non violence is “supportive and crucial.” His variation in diction deriving from descriptions of deaths and injuries as opposed to the righteous dignation convinces readers with what they would prefer. Similarly, his mentioning of violence as being harmful to “both sides” helps bring clarity to a point with lack of bias, and demonstrates how violence is damaging to all equally, regardless of his position on civil rights. He later moves on to once again explicitly stating distinct contrasts.

Anthony Johnson was born in Angola, Africa in 1600. He was captured as a slave and sent to the new world in 1621. During his years of service Johnson worked for a man named Bennet who lived in Virginia. Anthony worked as an indentured servant on his tobacco farm. Around 1635, Johnson was freed from his indenture and married the only female slave on his plantation, her name was Mary. They soon began their life together on a successful farm and had several children. Soon Johnson purchased indentured slaves of his own in order to form a successful farm. The significance of Johnson in the community in this time period was to show that some indentured slaves, who had not committed any crime, could be held against their will as a slave for life because

This creates a strong emotion of hopefulness within the reader since Chavez claims that he’s on their side which, helps convince the audience to listen to his argument about the importance of nonviolence more thoroughly. Basically, Chavez here is saying that we shouldn’t resort to violence no matter what hardships we face since it’s more important than relying on our negative emotions to attack others physically.

By depicting a sense of morals, Chavez is able to support the nature of nonviolence over any other possibility. The simplicity put into a single civil movement, allows for millions to participate from all across the country. The American people “yearn for justice,” and it is such yearning that appeals to such large crowds. Chavez also states that nonviolence “provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive.” By doing so, there is an advantage over the opposing side. Once escalated and turned violent, there is a “total demoralization” of the causae. In order to remain as morally good as the cause being fought, Chavez demonstrates how nonviolence would accomplish such.

When thinking of New York City, more often than not, the first things one visualizes is the beautiful skyline, the bright lights, and Times Square. But without a second glance, one might miss one of the important things about the city. New York is the most heavily Dominican populated city in the United States. It’s ironic that the first non-native American to migrate to and reside on what is today New York City, was from Santo Domingo, the capital city of the Dominican Republic. Throughout history, Dominicans have migrated to the US in search of economic opportunity. This is the factor that influences nearly every immigrant group that migrates to the US in history. In the early 1900s, The United States and the Dominican Republic had a very close diplomatic relationship, to the point where the President considered annexation. At one point, the United States completely controlled the Sugar industry, one of the country’s most profitable markets.

Mark Danner, an editor for the New York Times magazine, recounts in The Massacre at El Mozote a horrific crime against humanity committed by a branch of the Salvadorian army. He gives multiple points of views and cites numerous eye witnesses to try and piece together something that has been tucked away by the government at the time. In December, of 1981, news reports were leaked to major newspapers in the united states about an atrocity committed and a total massacre of a hamlet in El Salvador, known as El Mozote, or the Thicket. At first, the account was of over a thousand civilians, women men and children with no guerrilla affiliation were massacred. Danner pieces together the testimonies of the survivors, and interviews with

One of the most speculative experiences of conquest and dictatorship in the history of Latin America has been the socialist and dictatorial regimes in Chile. Chile has gone through multiple times of dictatorship, lead by the military, and also had lapses of a socialist government. The film “Machuca” by Andres Wood provided an insight of the series of social events in Chile in 1973, ranging from inter personal experiences to political issues and the Chilean nation. “Two dictators, Salvador Allende and Augusto Pinochet, both brought tremendous suffering upon the Chilean people -- one through his socialist policies and nationalization of

     After he delt with the death of a close religious friend he experienced the loss of a close

Oscar Romero was a El Salvadoran Christian leader (archbishop of San Salvador) who was dedicated to standing up for human rights and speaking out against the repression and persecution of the El Salvadoran people. He was motivated by both personal and spiritual reasons, such as the death of his friend and fellow priest, Father Grande, who was murdered by soldiers under orders of a corrupt government, fuelled his desire to stop the corrupt endeavours of political leaders. He took the mistreatment of people of the church, both with the torture and killings of priests and followers alike, as a spiritual transgression and spoke out openly numerous times throughout his time as archbishop. Despite the amount of overwhelming negative directed towards

In 1985, a movie was made that displayed the attitudes and fears that Americans had of the former Soviet Union. Although the

If you were to see Rocky for the first time and you were anything like most people, you would be overcome by a feeling of repugnancy and disgust. This is because he is a homeless person. His real name is Jack but people call him “Rocky” because of his 6’2” body and his somewhat larger than normal muscles. He doesn’t have the body of any average man. The combination of his light green eyes, his long brown beard, and his long mocha hair falling down from his winter hat, which he wears in every season, reminds me of a depiction of Jesus. But that’s just pure physical appearance. Most of the time, the hair around the rim of his mouth is covered by whatever food he just ate. Sometimes it’s white rice, sometimes it’s powder like that