Ronald Reagan Administration's Response To The AIDS Crisis

Mary Fisher’s speech entitled “A Whisper of Aids,” is an appeal to the emotional and political moods of the Republican National Conference on August 19, 1992. In this speech she talks about her disease, but unlike most people, who become depressed when they learn about contracting the disease, Mary Fisher stands up and fights for everyone who has AIDS as well as bringing the statics of HIV and AIDS to light. Mary Fisher’s speech can be analyzed from three different standpoints: structure, delivery, and appeal.

One of the big factors early on is that no one wanted to be associated with AIDS due to the fact that it was considered a homosexual man’s disease. There was a lot of fear, denial and anger surrounding this disease. In 1981at the CDC Dr. Guinan asks that a report about an epidemic with gay men had broken out and he wanted it published in the medical journal. The fear of the word “homosexual” was marked off and not used for that article. It took a long time for the realization that this disease could affect everyone from homosexual males, IV drug users, blood transfusion patients, women and even babies. Even though it was initially considered the disease came from gay men and their sexual practices it crossed all borders as time went on. Still today there is some prejudice regarding AIDS. (Spelling, Vincent &

With headlines in the news such as The Sun dubbing AIDS as the ‘gay plague’ it was an irresistible red rag to the bull for the media, even though in Africa other populations were infected right from the beginning. (Dowsett, W, Gary. 2009) In an excerpt from Simon Garfield’s The end of Innocence Britain in the time of AIDS, Roy Greensdale the assistant editor of the Sun from 1981 to 1986 recalls that ‘AIDS appeared to be just desserts for being involved in deviant sexual behaviour. It was quickly realized that it came about due to anal sex, and heterosexual executives on the Sun thus fed in the fact that it was a gay plague. AIDS tended to suggest that it might stop all that kind of behaviour, and might lead to fewer gays being about.’ The gay community has always been an easy target for hostility throughout history and when the controversy surrounding the AIDS panic began to surface it became another way in which to ostracise them for their ‘wages of sin’. (The Daily Telegraph). 1983).

As AIDS primarily affected homosexuals and drug users these populations were targeted by others with cruel hostility and many religious groups cited this was a punishment sent from God. With hatred and discrimination on the rise, these individuals not only had to coop with an unknown life threaten illness, but also endured unjust judgment from the public. As the illness continued to spread across the country Ronald Reagan acted as though it did not exist. As many believed this would only affect the homosexual community as well as drug users and Reagan’s Advisors felt these people were getting what they deserved. In addition, it was only after 20,849 deaths from the illness in which Ronald Reagan acknowledge the presence of AIDS. However, if Reagan had invested in education and research early on the human loss could have been

The AIDS epidemic began in the early to mid-1980’s and since it’s recognition in America it has become a very heated and debated topic among health professionals, the gay community, and most of all for the ones that are carrying the virus. The real debate is not over the virus itself but, rather about the infected individuals and whether or not they should be made morally obligated to tell their sexual partners if they are in fact infected. Both sides of the argument make very valid points. From one standpoint you have the gay community that believe in “safer sex ethic”, which keeps their partners in the dark about their overall health status and feel they are not morally obligated to tell their

Buckley, Jr., William F. "Crucial Steps in Combating the Aids Epidemic; Identify All the Carriers." New York Times: 18 March 1986.

Gay liberation throughout the United States had a purpose for lesbians and gay men to have gay lifestyles be normal. Gay liberation affected politics because gay men and lesbians wanted to inform their peers and family, which changed how citizens would view their sexual orientation. The gay liberation took place during the 1960’s through the 1980’s in which changed many cultures. The culture in the United States changed dramatically because during the 1960s through 1980s , there was an AIDS outbreak. AIDS was a sickness after HIV that would cause an individual’s body to weaken, therefore United States citizens would link AIDS to people who were gay or lesbian. For instance, David Rayside compares the United States to Britain, “After World War II, however, Britain once again stood out in the extent to public anxieties about sexuality were fanned and legal regulation of homosexual activity policed”(40) and “British authorities were especially preoccupied with the condemnation and strict containment of homsexuality.”(40). Homosexuality affected politics because authorities would prioritize the gays and lesbians before anything else. There were clear observations that governments from Britain and United States were not in favor for homosexuality, therefore attempting to change people's views on homosexuality so gays and lesbians would not be accepted into the society. Being accepted into a society requires majority of citizens to approve of other’s decisions. For example, citizens viewing gays or lesbians in public without attempting to discriminate their sexuality. The women’s movement was similar to the gay liberation because it affected politics greatly by hierarchies being

inevitable that AIDS would be defined in political and cultural terms as well as medically, and

In the documentary “The Age of AIDS,” FRONTLINE examines the outbreak of AIDS since its first diagnosed case in 1981. The film investigates different medical, political and social environments under AIDS pandemic in the US and worldwide. The film not only focuses on the scientific research and progress in treating the disease, it also looks at the social stigma, government strategies and public campaigns around different countries.

Ryan White was an all American kid, who any American family could relate to. He had contracted the disease through a blood transfusion, which could have happened to anyone. Unlike homosexual men who were seen as outcasts to society and sinners to most religious Americans, Ryan White was someone that the American people could root for. Because of this the people demanded treatment for AIDS patients from the government and the government gave them exactly that. When Margaret Heckler was the Secretary of Health, the only people who really demanded funding for AIDS treatment was the gay activists and the CDC itself. This made the problem easy to ignore as it seemed to be limited to a subsection of society but as time went on and more cases like that of Ryan White slipped into the public eye, the government realized that action had to be taken. Luckily in present day, the AIDS problem is declining at an enormous rate. The number of new HIV diagnoses fell 19% from 2005 to 2014. Yet thousand of gay and drug user patients of AIDS died in the 80s because of a lack of funding for treatment. Had the government taken action sooner, fewer people would have contracted the disease and fewer would have died. In this day and age, it is important that the government provide treatment to anyone suffering from a fatal disease such as AIDS so as not to repeat the mistakes of the

When the AIDS and HIV virus crept its way into the human-race, it quickly, and without warning, claimed the lives of millions. Then when its destructive wake had finally been abated, it left behind several untold mysteries. Throughout the course of this class, all the new material we have been exposed to has added some unique piece to the puzzle of the AIDS epidemic. Each puzzle pieces have ranged from speculations on how the AIDS epidemic had begun, to what exactly has the epidemic done. We have also tackled the question and how it forced a change in society. Our newest piece of the puzzle is the documentary “The Age of AIDS,” by William Cran. Although this documentary did not surprise me in its content, it did, however, affirm certain types

According to a report published in the February 1998 edition of “Nature”, scientists identified what they believe is the earliest case of AIDs in a man from the Congo in 1959. (Lerner and Hombs 39) By the end of the year 1980, 80 men would have been diagnosed with at least of the opportunistic infections that are a characteristic of AIDs. (Lerner and Hombs 40) AIDs cases in the 1980s increased dramatically not only around the world but in the United States, primarily in larger cities like Los Angeles, New York City and San Francisco. The numbers of AIDs diagnoses and deaths spiraled out of control throughout the 1980s and towards the end of 1989 there were 117,500 cases of AIDS reported and 89,000 related deaths.(Lerner and Hombs 54) In the

The 1980s era was interesting. It was the time of the ‘me’ generation. The decade was prosperous, and the U.S. was not involved in any major war. The overflow of sexual revolution from the 1960s and 1970s spilled over into the 1980s, but with a caveat. Instead of the swinging, free love, the presence of AIDS and the lack of understanding of how it spread, resulted in a panic. Was it to be ignored because it was considered a gay man’s epidemic? Should it be feared like the bubonic plague? Would a greater number of people contract the disease with few survivors? No one knew the answers, and the government health services was not forthcoming. In the early 1980s, this invisible disease spread across America, contracted by over 100,000 people in

The social and political milieu of the HIV/AIDS virus emerged in the gay communities of several metropolitan areas in the United States. When the virus emerged, it was a time of sexual freedom and gay liberation which created conditions that permitted the epidemic to spread rapidly. The milieu created AIDS activists and a number of community based organizations. With all of this in Burroughs Wellcome’s environment, exhibit 1 show that their proximate environment is AIDS patients, competitor’s treatments,

The film Dallas Buyers Club is a biographical drama whose plot is based around the HIV/AIDS epidemic of the 1980s. Early in the history of the illness, cases of a rare lung infection were found in five previously healthy young men. In addition to that, the young men all suffered from various other infections which indicated that their immune systems were not functioning properly. The new illness was so aggressive that before a report by the CDC could be published, two of the five men had succumbed to the illness. Besides the similar rare cases of lung infection amongst the five, there was one other shared characteristic; they were all gay men. By years’ end, there were 270 reported cases in gay men with the same disease; of that 270 however, 121 of those individuals had passed (Timeline of HIV/AIDS,2011). It was now clear that there was a new threat to gay men besides social ostracizing; HIV/AIDS had made its presence known.