Analysis And Criticisms Of The Rorschach

many, the word Rorschach is quite unknown and to others it is simply known as the inkblot test and even then, the real meaning of the Rorschach test is never acknowledged. The Rorschach inkblot test is a psychological projective test of personality in which a subject’s interpretation of ten standard abstract designs are analyzed as measure of emotional and intellectual functioning and combination. Also, like other projective techniques, “it is based on the principle that subjects viewing neutral, ambiguous stimuli will project their own personalities onto them, thereby revealing a variety of unconscious conflicts and motivations.” (Aronow; p 25)

Personality is a complex combination of factors that has been developed over a person’s entire childhood and young adulthood. There are genetic, environmental and social components to personality. A person’s personalities are not shaped by a single influence. Therefore tests that measure personality take into account this complexity and rich texture. The two primary types of personality tests are objective and projective. Objective tests include the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2), the 16PF, and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III). Projective tests include the Rorschach Inkblot Test, the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), and the Draw-a-Person test (Framingharm,

The next Rorschach test is used to determine the psychological traits of personality. The test originally was created in 1920 to determine thought disorder. It was developed from the observation that schizophrenia patients often interpret ambiguous images in very unusual ways. During the test, the participant is shown a series of inkblot cards and directed to respond to each with what the inkblot looks like.

The most efficient way to measure someone's personality is to observe how they behave, however, the behavioural observation method is seldom used in research. Behavioural data (reports) can help collect information about normal and abnormal personality characteristics and ways of thinking. To obtain behavioural observation data, researchers directly observe and record the behaviour of people in a laboratory or a more naturalistic (real-world) setting. This method is useful because many behaviours can be assessed through direct observation. Usually, two or more researchers conduct such observations to ensure higher accuracy and reliability (Schultz & Schultz, 2017) and although this method of data collection does

Reliability has a long history as one of the key psychometric properties of a test, but a given test might not measure people equally reliably (Hu, Nesselroade, Erbacher, Boker, Burt, Keel & ... Klump, 2016). Test scores from some individuals might have considerably greater error than others. It has a lot to do with the consistency of the test subject’s performance on the test. While there are several methods for estimating test reliability, the four major types are inter-rater, test-retest, parallel, and internal consistency (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012).

Test purpose: This development was to be a “projective practice for clinical assessment and diagnosis” (Rorschach, 2001).

The Jung Typology Test (JTT) has provided an insight into my personality, and I believe in some areas the test has not been very accurate while in others it has been very precise. I have provided my answers based on the situations that I have encountered and the way I reacted. For example, the question about the way I relied on my experience compared to theoretical alternatives was an appropriate question to test my personality. Experience has helped me to make the decisions about situations that I encounter on a daily basis. The test is the perfect tool to test an individual’s

2003 analyzed the test items as a whole with a Rasch analysis. They also analyzed the three subtests individually with Cronbach’s alpha, and then explored the verbal, numerical, and figural content of each subtest using a multidimensional random-coefficients multinomial logit model (Sternberg, et al., 2006). These analyses demonstrated that the STAT works best as a three-factor, between item model (analytical, practical, creative), as opposed to a one-factor model (Sternberg, et al., 2006). Furthermore, Sternberg et al. 2006 also demonstrated that a three-factor model (verbal, numerical, figural), within each subtest was only necessary for the analytical subtest. That being said, reliability measures of the three subtests were not high. Measures of .67, .56, and .72 for analytical, practical, and creative subtests, respectively, were provided (Sternberg et al., 2006). Moreover, the Rasch analysis of the STAT, as a whole, were slightly

The interpretive procedure, the 4’s, provides a significant structure to organize the key findings of the Rorschach inkblot assessment by modifying and adjusting the interpretations based on idiographic factors. This procedure is categorized into four steps: Scan, Sift, Synthesize, and Summarize. The first step is a brief preemptive step where the assessor scans over the scores in order to look for any extreme scores to give them a better idea of what they might find in the following steps. Sifting is the next step where the clinician carefully goes through all of the results, noting the standard score for each variable, section by section. The purpose of shifting is to formulate a preliminary interpretation by considering each score guided

Hermann Rorschach a Swiss psychiatrist and psychoanalyst created the controversial Rorschach inkblot test in 1921 to measure or detect underlying thought disorders, social behaviour and personality characteristics such as such as people with schizophrenia or other mental disorders. I have collected a few examples of different inkblot test for instance, different patterns, choice of colours and computerized effects on top of some of the inkblot to create an image. I like how simple, effective and creative the design for the one you can see either a bird, plane or superhero. I could try doing some experimentation to see how it goes and if it links in with my final concept design for the book or zine, the two posters and the promotional

In this write up, the different scales of measurement, nominal scale, ordinal scale, interval and ratio are discussed, including examples of test types that would usually employ them. Also, measures of central tendency, and measures of variability and their effect on test suitability are addressed in the second half of this piece.

The Rorschach test is a type of psychological test in which a subjects’ perception of inkblots are used to examine a person’s personality or underlying emotional issues. In the 1960s, the Rorschach test was one of the most widely used projective test in the United States. Since this test was so popular, I thought it would really cool to give it a try. I took ink from the art room and followed the instructions I found online. The main focus of my image was two people crawling towards one another. For the imagine in the middle I see a tree with many leaves growing from its trunk. The main image was at the bottom, this implies that I am sad about something. I see plans and people, this implies that I am a nature lover and I am sociable. I asked

The personality test “Kersey Temperament Sorter II” was to know what kind of personality of the four temperaments (Guardians, Artisans, Idealist, and Rational) do I have. The questions were based on my daily life, opinions, interest, and feelings. It was a personal question, in how would I react under various circumstances in a daily life. The questions were easier, simple to answer and short, where you give to know yourself. It was a psychological test where they evaluate your skills and aspects of your personality that most influence your future. The questions were to find the main characteristics of your character to deduce your personality for example what things you prefer, how you consider yourself ,what would you do in your daily life. My overall impression of the question used in this personality assessment was impressive because just with a few question it can describe your personality, even if you know yourself but no one else does and "Kersey Temperament Sorter II "describe you perfectly. I was surprised how the psychologist can interact with people and discover how each person behaves trough this test. There is usually no” good” or “bad” answer, as they seek compatibility of your personality. The questions are neutral and no one is going to judge because of there are four temperaments personalities and each one is different. You need to answer the questions with honesty to find your personality and is interesting how “Kersey Temperament

Since the development of Eyesnckpersonality theory, numerous measures were developedto assess the varioustraits of personality. However, one of the outcomeof this process has been a progressive increase in their length. This increase in length can be accounted for by the introduction of an additional dimension of personality within Eyesnck's scheme (Eyesnck&Eyesnck, 1976) and by the psychometric principle that

The TAT includes 30 cards, of which an assessor chooses a subset for a particular subject. The cards feature various ambiguous scenes, most involving interpersonal situations. The subject is asked to tell a story regarding the card, and the story may include an explanation of what is happening in the scene, what events preceded the scene, what events may follow the scene and what the people in the scene are thinking or feeling. The assessor uses the themes emerging from the stories produced by the subject to infer personality characteristics about the subject.