Rorschach Test Report

Correspondence regarding this paper should be addressed to Samantha Callahan, Danielle Patrick, Sara Roderick, and Kahla Stygar, Department of Psychology, Lindenwood University, 209 South Kingshighway, St. Charles, Mo, 63301

many, the word Rorschach is quite unknown and to others it is simply known as the inkblot test and even then, the real meaning of the Rorschach test is never acknowledged. The Rorschach inkblot test is a psychological projective test of personality in which a subject’s interpretation of ten standard abstract designs are analyzed as measure of emotional and intellectual functioning and combination. Also, like other projective techniques, “it is based on the principle that subjects viewing neutral, ambiguous stimuli will project their own personalities onto them, thereby revealing a variety of unconscious conflicts and motivations.” (Aronow; p 25)

The Rorschach inkblot test is one of the most widely known psychological projective test of personality, and the most controversial. In general, projective tests are psychoanalytically based tools that assist clients to reveal their unconscious conflicts via responses towards ambiguous stimuli, and can also help psychologists to determine psychological disorders. Specifically, the Rorschach allows individuals to interpret a series of abstract inkblots based on their emotional and cognitive function, as well as interaction (Barlow & Durand, 2009).

Practicum I paper Interpretation and consideration of available assessment information for the client. This practicum started on Monday, January 11, 2016, although officially it was supposed to have started on January 09. In order of the practicum to go on hitches free we had a brief working session with the practicum coordinator. She explained some of the expectations. All our worries and expectations were discussed.

Unfortunately, Baumrind’s failing is not simply due to pathos being the basis of her argument; rather, most of her evidence or claims of how the subjects would react in Milgram’s experiments are simply assumptions on her part. Baumrind claims that after an experiment like Milgram’s, she would expect subjects to be anywhere from “deeply hurt and anxious” to “alienated” and “distrustful” of authority in future (297). Baumrind does not provide any evidence to suggest that as a result of being fooled, every subjects would display negative emotional responses after being informed. She goes on to use her assumptions on subject reaction as fact and leaves them without any supporting empirical evidence. Baumrind’s argument does not include testimony from her own experiments proving that most subjects in “sociopsychological

The lesson and case studies presented for evaluation was a great learning exercise. A better understanding of how to interpret data was gained. Also, weighing the clinical significance versus the statistical significance to show relevance is invaluable. All research is not quality research and one must be equipped to recognize bias, threats to validity and proper population representation. Moreover, critiquing the credibility of a study is essential to the health care advances.

Because it was a qualitative study and the investigators coded responses, examining internal reliability is critical to determine whether or not the study exhibited reliability. The researchers used a constant comparative method to divide transcripts into text units and compare and regroup them. Two researchers independently ranked the responses, and they had 97% agreement on their coding, which

The Fugl-Myer assessment had a good inter-rater reliability. Its ICCs ranged from .93 to 1.000. The test-retest reliability with an interval of two weeks, the ICCs were .834 to .972 which was also good.

| Based on explicit knowledge and this can be easy and fast to capture and analyse.Results can be generalised to larger populationsCan be repeated – therefore good test re-test reliability and validityStatistical analyses and interpretation are

Under the given circumstances, the conclusion of the author is presumptive and difficult to agree with. To bolster his conclusion, the author needs to provide cogent proof indicating that the test results were unbiased and authentic. He should provide answers to the questions raised above to underscore his

The information is valid and useful as the researchers who conducted the study are professionals on the topic as they have been working on many different studies on the topic for a number of years. The one study was carried out for 19 years. This makes the results more reliable and valid. The limitations of this

Test-retest reliability, which is the measurement of change over 2 different measures, is seen in regards to this assessment. This type of reliability determines if an assessment is reliable over repeated measures. The BADLS had good test-retest reliability with a coefficient of r = 0.95 (Fish, 2011, p. 452). When measuring the reliability or consistency of an assessment, the standard coefficient should be greater than 0.9 (Hinojosa, Kramer, & Rogers, 2014, p. 152). This means that the BADLS is consistent in measuring change over 2 occasions.

All the above evidences and the fact they come from a respectable institution, enforces robust dependability. Moreover, the procedure and result will, soon, be reviewed by the Psychological Science journal; also, a respectable organization;

The Rorschach ink blot method is a valued personality test in the field of clinical psychology, described in The Oxford Handbook of Personality Assessment as capable of measuring an “individual’s adaptive capacities, coping style, underlying attitudes and concerns, and dispositions to think, feel, and act in certain ways.” (p. 278, Weiner & Meyer, 2009) The level of reliability and validity that the test can be empirically confirmed having is invaluable to the field of psychology, because the performance-based personality test can reveal behaviors and personality traits that the test-taker may not be fully aware of or would otherwise be reluctant to discuss in a self-report or direct inquiry assessment. And yet, the ink blot method in

Psychology while being a young science has taken over the various aspects of our lives. Psychology is used very liberally ranging from advertisement to job selection. Psychology has various tests that are used independently in order to diagnose and measure the behaviour of an individual. The psychological tests all have various usage and can measure different behaviours or diagnose mental health issues. There are numerous psychological tests and the focus of the paper is on the thematic appreciation test and Rorschach Inkbolt test. The tests are used on myriads of institutions and the popularity of these keep rising. The tests are used for identifying personality traits, canadites for particular roles, checking IQ levels and many more. Thematic appreciation test and the Rorschach Inkbolt test are both part of psychological tests. Both Thematic appreciation test and the Rorschach Inkbolt test are categorized under the projective psychological test. The popularity of thematic appreciation test and Rorschach Inkbolt test are very high. The paper will focus on the comparing and contrasting the Rorschach Inkbolt test and thematic appreciation test along with their usage.