Rotter's Locus Of Control Scale Test Analysis

Any leader knows that leading by example is an effective way to motivate. A leader that does this is normally treated with respect and fairness. One part of the importance of motivation involves self

Incidents and Influences: As I observed this students I began to notice a low level of achievement with an external locus of control. He seem to blame his failure in his writing journal to past experiences, saying that “I can’t do this” and “ I hate writing”. Other locus of control consist of effort when he put his head on his desk. When the teacher asked if he would like a study

Everything happens for a reason. Some individuals believe that they are the reason behind everything that occurs to them. Other individuals believe in a higher power that predestines them to a certain fate. There are still yet some individuals who fall in between both aspects of personality studies. A non-complex description of this is how my religion can be evaluated through the locus of control. I know a tad surprising, but religion just like in many aspects of the world places an enormous amount of emphasis on what I say or do each day. When I go to Sunday mass, I feel more relaxed about what is yet to come the next day because I have made the effort to acknowledge my rights as well as my wrongs in front of God. While on the other hand, when something doesn’t go my way I feel the need to condemn God and ask Him, “Why have you placed this obstacle in my way?” This brings me to my research question; does my external locus of control affect my behavior? After acquiring some knowledge on the topic in class and from previous readings, I have hypothesized that external locus of control does affect behavior. I will now introduce locus of control, provide evidence that supports my hypothesis, and review the main aspects of my argument.

Which translate into when it comes to problem solving it’s a hit-and-miss with me. Sometimes my solutions work and others times they don’t. reviewing the score, I can see what they are saying and thinking I agree with the score follow the proper process can results in better problem on my part and how you handle the situation. But having a good balance and understanding of your locus of control helps. My score 24 internal locus of control (strong), which I think fit me in my lifestyle. Having a strong locus of control allows me to control the outcome with hard work, attributes or decisions. Also, explains I am inquisitive, and try to figure out why things turn out the way they did. However, having a strong locus control some people want to control everything. This can lead to difficulties in taking direction furthermore, people may not want to work with this type of

I believe that I have an internal locus of control because most of my answers seemed to come from a place of reason rather than hoping on blind luck. The role this plays in my ability to make positive health-related decisions is that it allows me to think things through and realize that it is my choice to become healthy not waiting for

Locus of control refers to whether or not an individual believes that the outcome of an event is decided by one’s own free will or by fate (Rotter, 1966). A person with higher internal locus of control may

Rotter’s locus of control is a belief about whether one has control over one’s environment or not. An external locus of control indicates a belief that one is controlled by environment and situations; internal locus of control indicated a belief that one has control over one’s behaviors and abilities. Initially, Patrick was unsure whether his success was a result of his own efforts or his father’s influence and intervention. This insecurity indicated an external locus of control, but Patrick also works hard for his success. This can be seen as an internal locus of control. He control his outcome and success through maintaining his superior academic

According to the survey a high score indicates an external locus of control and a low score indicates an internal locus of control. For this one I was a bit confused at the beginning because my score is like in the middle of both answers. It’s not high or low, it’s in the middle. After analyzing the result s of the survey I came to the conclusion that it makes total sense due to me being generally neutral when facing certain situations. I hold the belief that most of the things that happened in our lives are because we influenced it to be that way. But, there also have been certain events in my life where the cause doesn’t come from my actions but more from being at the right place in the right time. I like to believe in both sides of the coin rather than an extreme. Due to this, I’ve never been able to choose a political party that I agree

There are two different locus of control. One is internal and one is external. If you have an internal locus of control you feel in control of your life and the events that occur in them. If you have an external locus of control you feel that you do not have control over your life or the events that occur in them. Depending on which locus of control you have can be directly related to your self-esteem and self-concept. People who have high self-esteem and self-concept are going to have an internal locus of control. Whereas, people who have low self-esteem and self-concept will most likely have an external locus of control (Lamberton & Minor, 2014).

As a leader, it's important to know yourself. In fact, I believe you can't lead if you don't have some basic knowledge of who you are as a person; like beliefs or strengths and weakness. My leadership must incorporate not only my positive attributes but must be willing to make changes with aspects of my personality that don’t work. Admittedly, I am sensitive and also passive. I tend to avoid conflict as much as I can. These characteristics might lead to issues of weakening my leadership. Being a leader to me shows having to show a strong front to most people. That doesn't mean a person should compromise who they are. I have to have a certain image when I enter a classroom. I can learn to be more assertive and have a firm voice in a classroom. I looked at the Johari Window website, to see what results I would get on their quiz.

whereas externals believe that feedback to be strictly due to forces outside of their control (Schultz & Schultz, 2013). Locus of control is a concept developed by Julian Rotter as part of his own social-learning approach to psychology. Haynes and Ayliffe (1991) utilize a theory of internal and external attribution that parallels Rotter’s locus of control, specifying attribution as an important mental process when addressing self accountability. Internal attribution is behavioral change that is instigated internally by the individual, such as a conscious decision to modify behavior. External attribution is change that is caused by outside factors such as medication or disease (Haynes & Ayliffe, 1991). An excellent example of these concepts is an alcoholic who is told

For my locus of control test score I got a 63. This means that I have pretty good control over situations. I most rely on my skills and intelligences to get things done but I sometimes use luck and other people for help. This score helps me understand how I deal with stress by showing me that personally, I take control. When I know I have a lot going on, I plan ahead and do a little everyday so it doesn’t pile up, otherwise I would get very stressed. Although I do get stressed easily, I do feel I deal with it well and am able to control it. I think the way I deal with my stress is positive to my health. I do sometimes deal with stress in other, less positive ways but for the most part I stick do time-management as my prevention skill.

The formation of worldviews can contribute to the locus of control and responsibility (Sue & Sue, 2013). Rotter’s (1966) locus of control consist of internal and external control; Internal control involves shaping your own destiny by your own actions, whereas, External control implies the future is predetermined regardless of one’s actions (Sue & Sue, 2013).

Laissez faire is the absence of effective leadership (Yukl G, 2010). Laissez faire leaders ignore problems and follower (Yukl G, 2010) and they do not contribute to the growth of the follower ( (Northouse, 2007). Feedback, rewards and leader involvement are totally absent in this type of leadership hence reduced organisational commitment.

The Rotter’s Locus of control scale has an internal consistency of about 0.65 to 0.79. The test-retest reliability ranged between 0.49 and 0.83. With regards to validity, there is a correlation between Rotter’s Locus of control scale and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale which ranges between -0.41 and -0.12 (Rotter, 1966).