preview

Rousseau Social Contract

Decent Essays

Since society changes over time the need for rules and regulations to safeguard citizens is unanimous in keeping the peace under social control without sacrificing individuality and local liberties. The term social contract is a moral philosophy that holds the theory whereby members of society give up certain natural rights by entering into a political agreement with the government to maintain social stability to protect society’s best interests (Gaines & Kappeler, 2015). This means there is an exchange of rights under the laws of democracy to provide officials the right to take another’s life, use physical force and deprive another of their liberties to secure life and regulating social conduct. Given these factors, Thomas Hobbes, Jean Jacques …show more content…

Under Rousseau belief, people lived in solitary without conflict of others and complicated rules in their natural environment (Friends, 204). However, over time humanity changed with the increase in population and people began to live in small communities. As a consequence, people started to compare themselves one with another, which resulted in public values, shame, pride, and envy, which led to the fall of humanity from the state of nature (Friend, 2004). Given the commotion of living in close proximity, it is believe that government must be established through a contract to grant equality and protection for society due to inequality as the population advanced. Since one can no longer act as he or she sees fit, it is directed by coming together as one body to represent the entire democratic body to decide how people can live together under the law to restore …show more content…

This is afforded through the political process that regulates conduct under the violation of the law and establishes bounders in reference to social norms and values of the social structure. Under the Tenth Amendment the enforcement of police powers are reserved for the states and provide police agencies with their roles and operational responsibilities (Gaines & Kappeler, 2015). This means that police work at the Constitutional level is not delegated to the federal government alone because there is no centralized police force with broad enforcement powers (Gaines & Kappeler,

Get Access