Roxboro Road Case Study

UNIT #1 WAS TRAVELING SOUTHBOUND IN REVERSE, OUT OF A PARKING SPOT IN THE ASA LOW INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL PARKING LOT LOCATED AT 1526 N. WALNUT CREEK DR. MANSFIELD, TX 76063. UNIT #2 WAS PARKED EASTBOUND IN THE STUDENT PICKUP LANE, LOCATED AT 1526 N. WALNUT CREEK MANSFIELD, TX 76063. UNIT #1 BACK LEFT INADVERTENTLY STRUCK UNIT #2'S BACK LEFT CAUSING

The driver lost control over the car and it over turned the vehicle when he couldn’t balance the vehicle on sighting tyre debris on the

At approximately 1:28 a.m., I arrived at the scene and met with Trooper Otten, who advised what had transpired prior to my arrival. Trooper Otten stated a blue 2014 Ford F-150, driven by Eric A. Wenzel, was traveling northbound on Illinois Route 4 south of Norton Lane. While traveling northbound, the blue Ford veered to the left and entered the southbound lane of the roadway. Once in the southbound lane, the front passenger’s side of the blue Ford struck the front passenger’s side of a southbound silver 2003 Ford F-150, driven by Alan L. Schilling. Trooper Otten stated both Mr. Wenzel and Mr. Schilling sustained incapacitating injuries in the collision Trooper Otten advised the silver Ford’s front seat passenger, Sarah L. Wagner-Schilling, sustained life-threatening injuries in the collision and was not expected to survive. Trooper Otten said Mr. Wenzel admitted to having been drinking prior to the collision and was suspected of driving under the influence. All three occupants had been transported from the scene

After striking the Chevrolet, the Saturn was redirected to its left (south), where it struck the concrete wall of the ramp. The Saturn deflected off the wall, and traveled back across the roadway to the right (north), before coming to rest against the concrete wall bordering the north side of the roadway. In its final resting position, the Saturn was facing northeast. After being struck by the Saturn, the Chevrolet spun clockwise, where it was then struck on the front driver side by the front driver side of the Ford. After being struck by the Ford, the Chevrolet was redirected back, where it came to final rest with its back-end near the concrete wall on the north side of the ramp. In its final resting position the Chevrolet was

Margaret told me she had her daughter take a photograph of the vehicles just after the collision. Margaret showed me the photograph and I observed Cheryl's Impreza in the left, right turn lane, and Krystyna's Odyssey in the right, right turn lane. Margaret sent the photo to my department cell phone, and I later copied it to the

On October 4th 2016 Deputy Akins was dispatched to 8821 Centennial Road for an accident involving a red truck that left the roadway and struck a parked vehicle. Upon arrival Deputy Akins saw a 2013 Red Dodge 1500 in the ditch with the truck’s front end smashed into the rear end of a 1001 Honda Civic. In the driver seat of the dodge truck was a male Caucasian. Deputy Akins recognized the male as Evan Case. Deputy Akins asked Mr. Case if he was injured. Mr. Case replied with I can just pay the deductible and leave right. Deputy Akins asked Mr. Case again if he was ok or if he needed medical. Mr. Case replied no.

Dispatch advised me that a a blue Hyundai and a blue GMC collided just South of the intersection of U.S. Highway 19 and Ridge Road. Dispatch further advised me that the male driver of the GMC fled the scene on foot, Southbound on the sidewalk of U.S. Highway 19. The driver was described as a White male, who was wearing a baseball cap, blue tee-shirt, and blue jeans.

Unit 2 was driving eastbound in the left lane of 167th St. between Orchard Ridge Ave. and Anthony Ave. in Hazel Crest, IL. Unit 2's approximate speed was 35 miles per hour. A large puddle of water had formed from a very recent rain. It covered the right lane and part of the left lane. The driver of Unit 2 noticed the puddle and proceeded to slow down to a speed of approximately 20 miles per hour. The driver of Unit 2 then noticed Unit 1 coming from behind in the right lane at a high rate of speed. Unit 1 tried to avoid the puddle without slowing down and impacted Unit 2. Unit 1 was pushed back into the right lane. Unit 2 was pushed off of the left side of the road onto the slightly raised median. The front and left side of Unit 1 was severly

The driver, Cecilia Blair, of vehicle 1 was traveling north through the intersection of N. State St. and Flint St. when she had a collision with vehicle 2. The driver, Jacqueline Muir, of vehicle 2 was heading west on Flint St. when she was struck by vehicle 1.

Applicant (Geico) proved that Respondent 2 (USAA) impacted the rear of their insureds vehicle by failing to maintain proper distance and control. Applicant (Geico) did not prove that Respondent 2 (USAA) pushed them into Respondent 1 (Geico) vehicle. Review of the statements obtained by both Applicant (Geico) and Respondent 2 (USAA) from Respondent 1 (Geico) indicate that Applicant (Geico) impacted the rear of Respondent 1's (Geico) vehicle prior to Respondent 2 (USAA) impacting the rear of Applicant's (Geico) vehicle. Respondent 1 (Geico) stated he felt only one impact from the Applicant (Geico) vehicle and who was not pushed back into them. Review of the Applicants (Geico) vehicle photos indicates Applicant (Geico) was braking at the time

On November 21, 1968, plaintiff Nga Li was driving northbound on Alvarado St. in Los Angeles. She was in the inside lane, and before reaching the Third Street intersection she stopped to make a left turn across three lanes of Alvarado, intending to enter a driveway. At this time defendant Robert Phillips, an employee of defendant Yellow Cab Company, was driving a company-owned taxicab southbound on Alvarado. He passed through the intersection, and collided with the plaintiff's car, resulting in personal injuries to the plaintiff, and damage to the car.

I reviewed all evidence submitted. Respondent 1’s evidence consisted of a vehicle photo, an ariel scene photograph and Respondent 1 driver’s written statement. The vehicle photo shows left quarter panel damage. It matches the diagram on the police report and does not prove that the Respondent 1 vehicle had almost completed it turn when struck by Respondent 2. The ariel scene photograph shows less detail than the police report diagram and does not support Respondent 1’s contentions. In Respondent 1’s driver’s written statement she says she heard brakes squealing. This contradicts Respondent 1’s contention that Respondent 2 did not take evasive action. The police report is the most compelling piece of evidence. The police report finds Respondent

Beginning this afternoon, Wednesday, November 22nd, Veterans Memorial Parkway will be open to traffic between Utica Ridge Rd and Elmore Ave.

Lynn Haven Ladder 1 was dispatched to the listed location for a motor vehicle collision. Ladder 1 arrived on scene to find a two car collision, compact sedan vs pick-up truck, with the sedan coming to rest in the middle of the roadway. The compact sedan had moderate damage to the front bumper and engine compartment and the pick-up truck had moderate damage to the front and rear driver-side cab. FD check both drivers for injuries; driver of the sedan complained of minor chest pain DT being restrained by his safety-belt. He denied any additional medical care. The sedan was removed from the roadway by PD, and FD cleared all debris and leaked fluids.

passing a car in the left lane. He must have been going 70 or 80 mph