Essay Rsm225 Assignment 2

2. The school should be held liable for Holbrook injury of there was no school supervision provided in the area Holbrook and other students were gathering.

During reconstruction, the meaning of freedom suited many different types of interpretation; the perception of freedom between former slaves and their slaves masters were very contradictory. To begin with, African-Americans had suffered severe abuse over those years of slavery, so to them, the meaning of freedom was basically a hope that in the future, they won’t experience all kind of punishment and exploration that they have been experienced so far. Besides that, formers slaves were demanding equal civil and political rights. In the same way, they valued their freedom by establishing their own schools and churches, reuniting families that were separated under

The manager will need to ensure that they have the correct level of rapport with their employee. Too familiar in nature may be misconstrued as forward and harassing in the wrong context. However no personal rapport whatsoever may provide the receiver of the information with the impression that the sender of the information is just not interested. A fine line must be weighed up for each individual. When a good rapport has been achieved, then the person will uncritically accept suggestion or advice which they are given.

Refer as needed to the material in Chapters 12 and 13 of the textbook. Keep the following tips in mind as you research data, as well as organize, analyze, interpret, and illustrate these data:

This paper was conducted as a Discussion Board Post assigned by Professor J. Reinke of: Liberty University, Graduate School of Business, Lynchburg, Virginia 24515.

_______________ I think that Luke is the victim in the situation. I believe this because the Mackenzie brothers agreed to all of the conditions in Luke’s contract but broke them anyways. Luke made several attempts to talk to the brothers about them not paying the utilities, which he was never able to do because there was no answer when he went to the apartment. Luke also did not receive the amount of rent that had been agreed upon, receiving $250.00, half of what the rent was supposed to be, on November 18th and December 22nd.

This topic raises the question of whether Willow and Xander are held criminally liable for Larry’s death by assessing the possible offences and defences that may apply. In order to decide the extent of their criminal liability, if any, a number of criteria need to be considered.

Elements of negligence exist here: Ms. Weinfeld did not have proof that the son of the Welling’s’ vandalized the party center although she put up flyers directly targeting the workplace and school specifically related to the Welling’s. Under these conditions, Ms. Weinfeld wrongfully targeted the Welling’s family since she could not identify the person whom vandalized her business.

• But for Lyle’s failure to follow the specific installation instructions with regard to the wrong widget, coupled with his failure to notice it was the wrong widget due to putting personal interests above performing per the subcontract agreement, the injury would not have happened;

Issue: A passenger that was carrying a package full of fireworks was rushing to make it onto a moving train at the Long Island Railroad station when two guards, one on the platform and the other on the train, attempted to pull and push the man onto the train. In the process, the passenger’s package fell onto the tracks causing an explosion that led to the scales at the opposite end of the platform to fall over, injuring Helen Palsgraf. Were the railroad guards’ actions considered negligent and therefore responsible for Palsgraf injuries?

The slip and fall injury undisputedly satisfies some of the elements required by the statute: subsections (b), (d), and (e) are met. First, Burov knew that the hot tub on his property created an unreasonable risk because he is a mathematics graduate student and recognized that children can drown or get seriously injured when using the hot tub. Second, the burden on Burov to lock a four-person hot tub with a wooden cover was slight in comparison to the coma and possibly permanent injuries Gaad sustained. Finally, Burov failed to exercise reasonable care to eliminate danger when he left the hot tub unlocked and covered it with a thermal blanket instead of locking it with the appropriate wooden cover. To determine Burov's liability, two elements

In figure two the bystander has the moral responsibility to refrain from pushing the other man off the bridge. Five men dying is unfortunate but is not sufficient grounds for a change of decision. This does not apply to figure one because the bystander does not have the moral responsibility to protect the man on the tracks given the train is on the track toward the group of five so it is best to let nature run its course. Figure three has already been discussed that a doctor has the responsibility to help the patient and he his decision cannot be changed based on death of other patients. Figure four is a variant of three: the military has a responsibility to help injured soldiers in war and does not have the responsibility to help with the diseases, therefore the penicillin must be given to the one. In figure six again the moral duty is to not push an innocent person off a

Both can be held liable. Jackson would be liable because she has an obligation to maintain the building and she failed. Dunn would be liable because he had a contract with his mother in regards to maintaining the building and he failed to meet his obligation. Playing the blame game didn’t solve anything and resulted in an injury and therefore both are liable in this case.

The plaintiff holds that the latent defects in the office space are a result of defective building works and thus claims that there has been a breach of contract as the builder acted negligently as they had a duty to take reasonable care in the construction of the offices.

Liverpool City council had brought an action against the defendants, Leslie and Maureen Irwin who were tenants in a 15-story block, owned by the plaintiff. It was located on Hai Heights, in the district of Everton, Liverpool. The defendants occupied a maisonette on the 9th and 10th floors of the building.