Rti Is A Major Aspect Of Education

Response to Intervention (RtI) is a “data-driven and structured procedure for analyzing students’ learning problems” (Friend 49). The purpose of RtI is to use a systematic approach of increasing interventions for students in order to determine if a student has a learning disability. IRtI is a great program for school to use to help students but it is not mandated by IDEA.

Compton would first receive tier one instruction along with the rest of the class using research based and proven practices. The service provider for tier one is the classroom teacher. Teacher will monitor progress and collect data. If it is noted that tier one instruction is no longer meeting his educational needs, Compton will be assessed by the RTI team to determine if he needs to move to tier two for more individualized attention.

Response to Intervention (RTI) is a three-tiered system that provides for increasingly interventions as students move upward through the tiers. The first tier involves all students on a campus. During this tier, all students are provided with effective instruction using research-based teaching and learning strategies. Students are benchmarked at the beginning, middle, and end of each year. About 65%-75% of all students respond to the initial tier of interventions and no further intervention is required. Tier 2 interventions take place in small groups and are in addition to the interventions of Tier 1. The areas of weakness are targeted, and instruction may be provided by the general education teacher or other school personnel. Student progress

Tier 1 focuses on effective classroom instruction and practices for academics and the management of behavior for all students. Tier 1 includes the quality core instruction and curriculum all students have equal access which incorporates the classroom teacher using proactive data-driven practices to identify and help children who are not being successful (Hilton, 2007). Using research-based differentiated instruction for all learners and a universal screener to measure proficiency at least twice a year are keys to an effective program. These screeners identify students who are not meeting standards. Approximate 80%-90% of students will be successful in a Tier 1 program. If less than this percentage is successful, classroom practices must be evaluated.

Response to intervention, also known as RTI, is a multi-tiered system for early identification and a process that implements support for students with learning and behavioral needs. There is no standardized system for RTI, therefore there are variations and many ways to implement and initiate these services. Typically these services are broken down into steps or tiers, in order to ensure all students are being universally screened and are receiving the help they need.

In this webinar the presenters focus on ELLs and RTI. The first key word is the evidence based assessment and curriculum. The focus of RTI is preventions and maximizing student’s achievement and students are growing academically. The goals are for all students to meet their highest potential and use general education. Sheltered instruction is part of the core curriculum. The core curriculum is meeting at least 80% on each sub group.

The author of the article also ascertain that the practice is an effective one since the RTI practice is capable of matching researched-based interventions that are of high quality to the behavioral and educational needs of the students. The practice also uses the concept of monitoring the progress used in assessing need for the require changes in goals or instructions, and finally, the practice may also include the additional tiers for the purpose of instructional intensity or if possible even to be eligible for special education (Rose & Howley,

Parents play a huge role in the RTI process. The ASCA National Model (2012) tells us that the “parent must feel welcomed at the school and that their voice is valued” (p. 17). The purpose of RTI is to determine what students are struggling academically or behaviorally, and provide intervention. It is the job of the RTI team to determine if the interventions are successfully working (ASCA National Model, 2012, p. 73). Most parents want what’s best for their child, which includes a successful and positive school experience. Parental involvement is essential, because they can provide extra support at home to help their struggling student. For example, I had a student last year who was on the third-tier of the RTI process.

In regards to the reading program it is appropriate for each special education and at-risk student. The reading program is implemented with specifications acquiescing to their individual education programs (IEP), and recommended reading levels. Although the students are working together in a small group in the second tier of the intervention process, each student progresses according to individual achievement based on goals designated in their IEP, and teacher recommendations based on their current reading grade level. The individual responsiveness of each student determines whether they transition to the third tier of the RTI process, or if they are able to appropriately progress at the current level of intervention. Presently, the two at risk students have maintained the status quo, not progressing sufficiently, and have

The intervention model we use in our school is RTI. With Response to Intervention the instruction that as a function of the outcomes of the assessments. RTI drives changes in hopes to see in students succeed, who are identified at some level of risk for not meeting academic expectations. Tiered instruction represents a model in which the instruction delivered to students varies and are related to the nature and severity of the student's difficulties. This model is sub divided by 3 tiers:

In our school, we use the RTI model to deliver high quality instruction to our students. We use it a variety of ways in the classroom. One way, is through our reading groups. At the beginning of the year, all the kindergartners' reading was assessed. From there, they were broken up into reading groups. The classroom teacher guides the groups through instruction. The groups reading at a higher level only meet two times a week, while the lower-level groups meet three times a week. Those needing additional support, and more intensive instruction, also meet with the kindergarten special educator. We only have one student who needs this services.

RTI has three tier levels. At Tier 1, all students are at the general instruction and assessment stage. At Tier 2, some students are at the supplementary instruction and assessment stage. At Tier 3, few students are at the specialized instruction and assessment stage. This stage can take quite some time for students to get out of, but educational professionals need to continue to be patient and work with students. This is also an opportunity for educational professionals to collaborate with their team to come up with differentiated instructional

RTI helps school districts recognize students who are below grade level and provides progress monitoring, interventions and intense instruction (O’Meara). The RTI framework consists of three components, the assessment process, tiered interventions and the problem solving method (Appelbaum). Tier 1 provides instruction that is curriculum aligned, utilizes differentiated instruction and feedback on progress (Searle). If a student is struggling in tier 1, they are moved to tier 2. Tier 2 offers students additional services and academic support (O’Meara). Students in tier 2, receive general classroom instruction in the classroom, with additional instruction in any weak areas of content (Searle). For students that need more support than offered in tier 2 are put into tier 3(O’Meara). Students in tier 3 require individualized instruction and academic support in a one on one setting with a special educator. Tier 3 students are pulled out of the classroom when students are working independently, this is so students in tier 3 do not miss out on general curriculum (Searle). This paper will explore further in depth the RTI framework.

Within the RtI model assessment refers to the collection of data through multiple methods such as behavioural incident reports, screening, nomination, formative assessments and functional behavioural assessments. These produce comprehensive quantitative and qualitative data that can be used to screen and identify students for social and behavioural problems and provide early intervention (Massey University, 2017; National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, 2011). Assessments are used to monitor the responsiveness to the interventions and determine whether a student is not responding to interventions (Hawken, Vincent, & Schumann, 2008).

Data-Based Decision Making has a step by step process that must be followed, when implementing Response to Intervention/Instruction (RTI). If Data-Based Decision Making is not included within the intervention process RTI is not being used. Core curriculum is reviewed using Data-Based Decision Making. RTI utilizes Data-Based Decision Making at each tier level. This is how states allocate resources and establish school policies. Data is used by school districts as a tool to help evaluate the effectiveness of the RTI model. This tells school administrators and teachers what teaching strategies and approaches are working and those that need to either be improved and/or eliminated. Schools use data to take a look at their overall framework and essential components. Core curriculum and instruction are developed for RTI tier levels based off of data. This is why it is important to know what type of data you need. Know the why behind the data that you collect! That’s what Data-Based Decision Making is about!