Ruby And Rose: The Autobiography Of A Conjoined Twin

Having now acquired the ball playing equipment, the Hero Twin brothers, Hunahpu and Xbalanque, played ball in the very same court above Xibalba as had their father and uncle had played in long before them.

Throughout history, and especially in the early 20th century, women were not in the same arena as men; they were not a man’s equal. The Mariam-Webster Online Dictionary, defines “trifle” as something of “little value, substance, or importance,” which is the way women are seen in both William Faulkner’s short story, “A Rose for Emily” and Susan Glaspell’s one-act play, Trifles. Both authors use of style and settings are different but their theme is the same. Faulkner and Glaspell were born and wrote in approximately the same era, America’s late 19th and early 20th centuries. Glaspell, the author of Trifles is from the northern United States and uses a lower class, uneducated vernacular of that area; whereas, “A Rose for Emily” is written in an eloquent upper-class English tone, by Faulkner who was from the south. Faulkner metaphorically and symbolically describes the personality, life, and death of the main character, Ms. Emily Grierson, and the murder- mystery surrounding her. Glaspell’s murder -mystery Trifles also surrounds the life and death of the main character, Mrs. Wright, and her husband. Both women, while representing opposite ends of the socio-economic class spectrum, are isolated and lonely,not only due to their social class but also due to a time in history when men were not kind to the “fairer sex.”

“A&P” and “Girl” both symbolized the protagonists’ oppression by an older, more experienced generation. However, Kincaid’s “Girl” was artistic with an undercurrent of selfless love and hope while Updike’s “A&P” was uninspiring with selfishness and lust. The protagonist of “Girl” discouraged her daughter’s dreams out of love. The protagonist of “A & P” encouraged the antagonists’ out of a selfish desire for self-promotion.

Physically incapable of living a normal life, Nancy Mairs writes “On Being A Cripple” and Matthew Soyster writes “Living Under Circe’s Spell,” having both experienced the hardships of a disability. Struggling to form somewhat of a pleasurable life, they both share similarities in their writings. With these similarities, both Soyster and Mairs, attempt to express their newfound challenges in their lives, but, they both compose different ideas in their writings.

In the story, the names and personalities of the characters clash. The name is the mask covering the personality, which is representative of the reality aspect of each character. When Mrs. Hopewell named her daughter Joy, she was hoping for all the joy that comes with raising a child and watching the child develop a life of its own. What Mrs. Hopewell received was a disabled daughter who

In the play, The Other Half, by Scott C. Sickles, a surgeon is given an arduous task of culling between the life and death of two conjoined twins. In this play, a pair of girl twins are joined together by the heart and only one can live. It is up to the surgeon to decided which twin to let live and which to let die. The surgeon acknowledging that there is not enough time to preserve both girls, the surgeon is faced with a decision that would leave him with a blood in his hands. In this play we are able to heedfully aurally perceive and connect to the surgeon as he prepares for this task, while additionally heedfully auricular discerning the imaginary twin girls verbalize about how they picture their futures to be if they were to be the one who survives.

Every individual struggle with self-acceptance at some point in their life, furthermore, every individual chooses to exemplify their struggle to accept themselves in different methods. In the short story “Boys and Girls” Alice Munro focuses on the narration of a girl, in which girls are underappreciated in the society. The protagonist in the story cannot accept who she is, and it makes it harder for her as other individuals do not accept who she wishes to be. The author demonstrates this through the character’s external motivations. As the story is written in third person limited readers understand the girl’s personal thoughts and how she is internally conflicted about who she is. She feels underappreciated for the work that she provides which influences her to be disobedient to others around her. Alice Munroe’s short story “Boys and Girls” demonstrates to readers that individuals struggle for self-acceptance through the expression of their external and internal motivations. Because of their motivations, individuals feel rebellious against their self-conscience.

Mrs. Wright in “Trifles,” Emily in “A Rose for Emily,” and Mildred in “The Hairy Ape” exemplified a woman’s culture of social isolation. Condemned in a house alone to worry only about her wifely duties, Mrs. Wright’s husband isolated her from the community and past self. Pressured by her father, lover, and her own fear of abandonment, Emily lived a life of isolation from love and her community. Caused by her many years living in the higher class, Mildred felt isolated from the rest of society and the lower class. Mrs. Wright, Miss Emily, and Mildred have all been pushed into seclusion away from general society, in turn causing all three of women to take drastic measures to break their isolation. The three females in “Triffles,” “A Rose for Emily,” and “The Hairy Ape” demonstrated the negative effect of social isolation.

When somebody thinks about the west the first things that presumably ring a bell are most likely Cowboys, Indians, Gunfights and The Gold Rush. Almost none individuals consider blacks and their commitment to the development of the west. This is because the fact that the west was viewed as free domain blacks, were still defeated to a certain degree. What individuals need to acknowledge is that slavery is more mental than anything. Blacks made commitments in numerous zones of the west: on the farm, in wars, furthermore in trade. In this paper, I will convey to light a dominant part of the numerous commitments that blacks made to help make the American west what it is known today as “The Buffalo Soldiers”. Numerous individuals convey the confusion

Thus, he treats her like a child and “laughs at [her]… ” and calls her a “‘...little girl’” (Gilman 90, 94). For these two female characters in “A Rose for Emily” and “The Yellow Wallpaper”, their struggles are a direct result of male dominance, and their coping mechanism escorts them away from the world that devalues them.

The genuine appreciation of heritage and family is the focus of Alice Walker’s “Everyday Use”. Dee and Maggie’s characters are the vessels that Walker uses to demonstrate the difference between appreciating possessions for their usefulness as well as their personal significance and their contrasting value as a trendy, materialistic connection. There is a palpable difference between Maggie and Dee, both in physical appearance as well as in personality traits and their treatment of the personal artifacts that come into play within the story is very telling of this.

A True Tale Gives Life to Fictional, Bone Chilling Entertainment: The Unmasked Similarities and Differences Between “Trifles” and “The Hossack Case” both written by Susan Glaspell

Sometime in the late eighties, Shaun McNiff, Sr. Kathleen Burke and I sat in a small pub in Cleveland, Ohio. It was after midnight when conversation turned to my writing project, this book. Sr. Kathleen asked, “What’s the title going to be?”

Second amendment rights are a controversial subject, but in her article, “A Peaceful Woman Explains Why She Carries a Gun,” Linda M. Hasselstrom explains why those rights are important to her. Hasselstrom uses logos, pathos, and ethos to entertain readers and to inform them of why she carries a gun.

In “The Author to Her Book,” Bradstreet is awash in indecision and internal conflicts over the merits and shortfalls of her creative abilities and the book that she produced. This elaborate internal struggle between pride and shame is manifested through a painstaking conceit in which she likens her book to her own child.