Russian Revolution Dbq Analysis

The instant consequences to the emancipation of the serfs left Russia crippled, ironic, when alleged that it intended to advance Russia’s status. Many historians argue that despite abolishing serfdom, the means in which it was carried out didn’t coincide with reality. Subsequently, there were many riots which caused a rise of political groups such as Narodnik movement whose existence proves that Russian society was changing. Disorder spread with calls for change within Russia like In May 1862 where a number of pamphlets were issued including the radical Young Russia. Such propaganda aimed to gain support and create challenging individuals which would pressure the Tsar to make further changes. One could argue that as a result this led to the 1905 revolution and the end of Tsardom.

The Russian Revolution began in 1917 and lasted until late 1930’s, the revolution was very brutal with total death of 3 million people and 7 million people were arrested (Document 12). The revolution broke out when Nicholas II comes to power because Bloody Sunday leads to Duma, then he steps down and the Duma sets up a provisional government thus sparking the want for domination and the revolution kicks off (Book). By the end of the revolution Russia was definitely weakened in some aspects but strengthened as a nation. Therefore, the Russian people were better off after the Russian Revolution because they benefited from a better economy, government, and living conditions.

During the 1900’s the Russian Government made it extremely hard for the Bolsheviks to progress which made them revolt against the government making this a prime matter for the start of the Revolution. The Czarist government was ostracized by the common people of Russia so Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown by the Provisional Government, whom later on were overthrown by Lenin and shortly after the Bolsheviks took control over Russia. Russia was hard to develop because of the major leaders who had control; Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Almost overnight an entire society was destroyed and replaced with one of the most radical social experiments ever seen. Poverty, crime, privileged and class-divisions were to be eliminated, a new era of socialism

The cause and effects of the American Revolution (1775-1783) are quite controversial among students and historians alike. One opinion believes that the American Revolution was a conservative movement, meaning that the revolution sought to preserve original American values while trying to eliminate some negative aspects of the New World, such as its ruler, Great Britain. While Americans achieved independence from England in the end, America’s initial traits were not preserved, but rather altered. The Revolution drastically changed political and social features of the United States but the economy was hardly affected.

The Russian revolution was a monumental change for Russia they went from a government of ordocrasy to communism, with evidence it will show that this truly was a change Russia needed. Yet many argue that the death and outcome was not what the people had imagined when agreeing to communism.

“No taxation without representation!” That is what every colonist in the Thirteen Colonies shouted before the revolution started. Or that was what most people thought. Not all colonists wanted to gain independence like people today thought they did. In the mid 1700s, the colonists decided to go to war with the British to gain their independence. This was called the American Revolution. However, not all colonists agreed to do this. About ten percent of the colonists were loyal to the King. They were called Loyalists. About forty percent wanted to declare independence from the British. They were called Patriots. The other fifty percent didn’t care one way or another and were neutral. This created a lot of tension due to the diverse point of views.

Every day in the United States there are equal rights, trial by jury, and representatives from each state in our government. And how did America get these rights and policies? When colonists started to settle in the new world, they thought that they could make their own colonies with their own laws and government. However, this was proven to be incorrect as the British still had power over the colonies and of what they exported, what the laws were, and what they did in the colonies. Was the American Revolution more about economic rights (when economic equality and freedom are preserved) or civil liberties (the basic rights guaranteed to individual citizens by law)? Three arguments that support that the American Revolution was about civil liberties are the proclamation of 1763, the quartering act, and the declaration of independence.

The original thirteen colonies declared independence on the fourth of July 1776; however, the Battles of Lexington and Concord marked the start of the American Revolution. In the Treaty of Paris of 1783, signed by Britain and the United States, Britain formally recognized the independence of the United States and granted a colossal amount of land to the states. The American Revolution, depicted as a sudden shift in social institutions, actually resulted from a gradual change. The weakening loyalty to the crown and escalating responses to taxation served as examples of the spread of the independence movement.

In 1917, Tsar Nicholas ll is the current ruler of Russia. Russia’s economic growth is increased by the czar’s reforms of the production of more factories. Since, Russia desperately needed to keep up with the rest of Europe’s industry. This reform worked out perfectly, but the working conditions of these factories didn’t please factory workers. After the events of the Russo-Japenese War, “Bloody Sunday”, and WW1, all of Russia was in utter chaos under the czar’s ghastly leadership. With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the problems that kept coming up, all of Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate

didn't go well either and colonists were furious, not so much because it was costly and burdensome, but because of the principal and the fact that they would have the nerve to put in place more taxation directly after the chaos of the Stamp Act. I was outraged myself, if we rebelled against taxation multiple times and also rebelled against the Quartering Acts, why would we all of a sudden give in to this especially after we fought for the right to manage our own taxation. This was very foolish, and led to boycotts on all British goods. Through very much hardship, Boston and some other colonies were able to boycott and stop the flow of all British imports. Even women would take part in this when men came to the understanding that “unless women

In analysis of the our country’s fight for independence, historians and many others have looked deeper into what the war really was about and how “revolutionary” it would be identified as. The topic itself has been brought down to two broadened opinions delving into whether the war was conservative or radical. After taking on ten primary documents that could help to solidify one answer, it has been recognized that the Revolution was less revolutionary than originally suspected. Parts of these documents have influenced the analysis, such as Document #2, #9, and #10. These documents help show a more conservative perspective on how our country received its independence. More becomes clear about the way the Revolution negatively affected other groups of people excluding the rich, white men that made up the majority of our founding

One of the biggest events in history is when the colonists decided to declare their independence and break away from Great Britain. Was it necessary though? Yes, it was necessary for America to declare independence from England as they had begun to outgrow their relationship for many years. The three main reasons that contributed to the American Revolution were as follows. The first reason was that the colonists were being taxed unfairly, the second reason was that colonists had no representation in the English Parliament and the third reason was that the governing mother country was an ocean away from the colonies. The colonies were first taken over by the British in the early 1600’s, and by the 1700’s King George governed these Colonies.

After the course of the American Revolution society became more aware of changes within the household including the positions of women, slaves treatment, and the battles within the power of the government. People began to protest more freedoms because of the creation of the Bill of Rights which led to more support groups with the people because they realized that there was a problem within the government. With people gaining more right that gave more of a voice to minority groups such as slaves which would also lead to them being counted for in the government. With more people striving for a voice within society this lead to the creation of jobs and a boost in the economy.

A) Robert E. Brown’s point is that Massachusetts did not have internal class conflicts. He believes that the revolution was started with the intent of bringing social justice rather than separation. The colonists wanted a democracy while Britain had social hierarchy, such as the aristocrats, the working class, and the poor. Colonists wanted equality and therefore fought for a government that paralleled with their little internal conflicts amongst the people.

For three centuries before the revolution, life in Russia was not peaceful. It was cold, hard, and bitter instead. “The end of serfdom was a major event in Russia; yet it just wasn 't enough.”, in 1861. Serfdom, under feudalism, is the the status of peasants in which they are bound to a lord, or master, works on their land, and can be sold like property. Despite serfs being given ‘freedom’, Russia was mostly ruled by the czar and nobles. The average person was, and stayed, poor. Therefore, World War I was not the main cause of the Russian revolution. This outdated feudal class structure, inability to modernize, lack of peace, and czars’ inept leaderships lead to the Russian Revolution.