Russian War Case Study

It appeared that they now had the power to defeat in a war against major European nations such as Russia and became a new threat. In the meantime, Russia finds itself in a time of reconstruction, trying to avoid any type of anarchy. The changing times for Russia left them vulnerable to invasions.

It massive forests and frozen tundra’s have picturesque views that would astound anyone. The country has a land surface area of 6,592,735 square miles, making the largest country by land comparably to the world. Since Russia is the biggest country in the world, it has every landscape imaginable. From Lake Baikal, the biggest lake in Europe, to the Ryn desert, and the cold Siberian forests. Russia has it all when it comes to land geography. The northern part of Russia concealed with the Arctic Ocean, which is froze for the majority of the year. To the west the only way Russia has access to the Atlantic Ocean is through the Black Sea, and then through the Mediterranean Sea. Another way to access the Atlantic Ocean is through the Baltic Sea or through the Barents Sea, which is only operable in the summer, since in the winter everything over the 60-degree latitude line turns into ice. Even though Russia can access the Atlantic Ocean through the sea when you look at a map, there is two more non-geographic obstacles. The first one is that countries that are around the sea, for example, Turkey, and Denmark, which are part of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), can deny or make it hard for Russia to use those routes. NATO’s purpose is to pledge the liberty and safety of its members through military and political methods. In other words, if one NATO country takes a conflict with a non-member of NATO, then all

In 2014, Russia captured the Crimea and Sevastopol, and unfurled tens of thousands of troops near Ukraine border. This is where the conflict flashed between pro-Russian separatists and the new government in Kiev. Russia's actions, including reported military aid for separatist troops, mark a serious major threat to generally accepted principles of world order, such as, sovereignty and

The foreign policies of Russia also compliments in many ways its domestic policies, both in the apparent want for dominance and security in the focal point on sovereignty. These aims lead to an importance on bringing back Russia’s international status and removing positions of power that Western states have had in Russia

The Russian history before and during the Second World War affected the policy of containment because the Russians wanted to establish security and expand their territories. The policy of containment was a policy of the United States to use vast strategies that can prevent the spread of communism. This policy helped the Soviets with its sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, China, Korea, and Vietnam. In 1826-1828, the Second Russo-Persian War emerges and Russia extends its rule over the Caucasus mountains. In 1853, the Crimean war breaks out between Russia and France and concludes the Treaty of Paris of 1856,...... Russia established political borders with the Qing Empire and Japan. Russia gained positions on the Baltic Sea and the Pacific Ocean. Russia wanted to seize territory for ambitions of private officials and religious conviction. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the Romanovs developed an absolutist system of government. However, Russia wanted to become an Empire for the conquest of Siberia, for vast territory and richness in fur. Incorporation of the fertile land in Ukraine, and victory in a prolonged war with Sweden. Russia established many expansionist fronts southwest to the Black Sea, south into the Caucasus and Turkestan, and east into Manchuria where there success depended on annexing territories. This led Russia to invade the Ottoman territories and Walachia in 1853. The United States committed itself to the policy of containment to prevent any

While chaos continued to spread across the country, Russia began to eye the territory of Crimea, one if Ukraine’s most southwestern territories and an area that used to belong to Russia until it was transferred to Ukraine in 1954. By the end of February, masked Russian troops without insignias took over the Supreme Council of Crimea and several strategic sites across Crimea. This event led to the installation of the pro-Russian Aksyonov government in Crimea and the declaration of Crimea 's independence. This spurred the Ukraine’s provisional government to request an emergency meeting with the U.N. Security Council in which they called on Russia to stop all military action in Crimea. By Mach 1st, Russia’s parliament approves President Putin 's request to use force

For example, Russia helped to clear unexploded ordnance left behind by NATO’s bombing during the Kosovo war of 1999, and in 2014, helped fly in emergency relief when floods hit the region. Since then, Russia has regularly been helping with forest fires, providing tents for migrants and training emergency responders. To the citizens, Russia’s consistent involvement, on top of its historically strong ties, creates a sense of trust and goodwill. This also increases their likelihood of buying into Russian propaganda against the West. Although the EU has provided $3.16bn in aid since 2000, an amount that dwarfs Russia’s in comparison, a recent poll showed that Serbs wrongly believe Russia to be one of their main benefactor and 64% view NATO as a threat. However, this does not mean that Serbia is entirely pro-Russia, as 40% of the population is in favour of joining the EU.

The consequence of World War Two left the United States and Russia as the prevailing military forces on the planet, yet they had altogether different types of government and economy, the previous an industrialist majority rule government, the last a comrade tyranny. The two countries were adversaries who dreaded each other, each ideologically restricted.

Why did russia invade was it justified? Moscow fears the rise of Islamic extremism among Russia’s substantial Muslim population, in addition to separatist movements among certain ethnic groups, particularly the Chechens. The Kremlin views these forces as a severe threat to the state, and thus it willingly supported the U.S. led overthrow of the Taliban a movement which had provided aid to these groups. Moscow has also used its participation in America’s “War on Terror” as an excuse for heavy handedness in its crackdown on Islamist and separatist movements in Chechnya and elsewhere. Outside its borders, Russia is concerned about the growth of Islamism and terrorism in its traditional sphere of influence or “near abroad” the Balkans, the Caucasus, and Central Asia. Many militants from these areas have significant ties to the Taliban, al-Qaeda, or other groups in Afghanistan, and therefore Russia does not want to see a Taliban comeback in Kabul or a failed state emerge in Afghanistan. While the Kremlin may disapprove of NATO’s presence along its

NATO relies on stable political and economic conditions for members to meet their obligations. Several NATO countries are limited by economic development and national debt. In 2014, NATO Allies pledged to increase defense spending and meet the NATO 2% guidelines. (EUCOM Posture Statement, 16) Recent Russian manipulation of political and economic programs exploits this vulnerability and creates instability and weakens the NATO Alliance. (USEUCOM Theater Strategy, 3)

Both Washington and Moscow recognized the huge power vacuum throughout Europe as the Nazi’s Germany waned. The United States recognized that the Russians would rise out of World War II the foremost power with the potential to dominate Europe and Asia alike. The mistrust, which started during the war between the Americans and the Russians, continued to proliferate. As a direct response to the Soviet menace, NATO was established. For the Russians part, after World War II, the Russians were slow to withdraw their troops from the Middle East and Turkey. Furthermore, the Russians began to accumulate their Iron Curtain installing

The two countries, Russia and Ukraine, had different reactions towards the armed violence and impeachment of the Ukrainian president. Although the majority of the Ukrainians opposed Viktor’s decision to procrastinate the signing the EU-Ukraine integration agreement, all the ex-presidents accused for its interference with the affairs of Crimean. The former presidents of Ukraine, including Leonid Kravchuk and Leonid Kuchma described the present crisis as Russia’s political interventions designed to interfere with the internal affairs of Ukraine and its relationship with the European Union (Hanschke 1). The people of Crimea have not been seeking for secession from Ukraine, but their interest is to have extended autonomy and rights to govern the Crimean affairs with minimum involvement of the government of Ukraine. Russia, on the other hand, have dismissed the accusation and stated that it is pursuing the interest of the people of Crimea to join the Federation of Russia. Russia holds that the people of Crimea have the power to decide the future of their territory and Russia will be ready to respect their decision. Study shows that about 90

Robert Alexander’s The Kitchen Boy: A Novel of the Last Tsar illustrated great depth of knowledge in the Eastern Europe region, specifically, Russia. By reading the daily life and struggles dealt by the Russian Imperial Romanov family during their house arrest in the year 1917 up until the family’s death in 1918, the reader is able to identify and comprehend Russia’s religion, culture, and issues during this time period and how it came in effect for the Romanovs and enhanced the reader’s understanding of the region. Historically speaking, Russia has had a deep conflict with its people and the government over long periods of time. Russia’s government has gone through several transformations since the Last Tsar’s regime.

Under international law Russia’s invasion of the Crimean Peninsula is illegal as the Referendum held on the 16th of March by Russia infringed upon the

NATO encourages Russia to resume co-operation on the broad range of issues foreseen in the Founding Act and to engage actively in the EAPC and the Partnership for Peace. NATO also emphasizes that the further development of their co-operation depends on Russia's respect for international norms and obligations.