SFBHC Case Study

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) states that in order to realize meaningful use of the EHR technology, healthcare providers are obliged to apply the technology in a approach that enriches quality, safety, and efficiency of healthcare delivery; ebbs healthcare inconsistencies; involves patients and families; enriches care coordination; expands population and public health; and guarantees sufficient privacy and security guards for personal health information. (U.S Department of Health and

Today’s world in Health care Electronic health records are being utilized in every office. With that utilization of the electronic health records from your staff and physicians and patients, the reduction in mis-diagnoses is continuing to decrease as the years pass. Some would say that EHR is a continual migration path sometimes dictated by internal organizational issues. (Latour, 2009) A CIO would need to research and evaluate every option for her hospital staff. The hospital would do great to join the newly HIR organization to extend its ability to care for patients across the continuum of care (Latour, 2005) The whole purpose of the EHR system is to provide quality care by providing care to patients ensuring accuracy, comprehensiveness, data integrity, data security, and decreased medical errors within the patients chart and clinical side.

The SWOT analysis will focus on the organizations and their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Organizations will have to face challenges, but how they recover and cope with them is important. The SWOT implies that the implementation of EHR faces some challenges of improving the safety, cost, Lack of System Integration, and productivity of patient care. Legal compliance/regulations are still a problem facing the healthcare industry as they assure security of information. The investment in the EHR is a key area when addressing these concerns because of the access of healthcare supply chains increase in workflow and efficiency. Hence, the implementation of EHR requires a level of data within the system by a

The software related Electronic health record implementation need to be appropriate for the needs of the organization and budget.(Swab, & Ciotti, 2010) The EHR software system has many areas of market depending upon the size of the hospital bed size. The first criteria for the vendors according to the bed with 100 and small hospital The Electronic health record system cost about between $ 1 million and 2 for the electronic health record system The electronic health record software cost for the organization about medium hospital cost is much larger than the first one. It comes around three to ten million. The hospital and organization with more than average bed cost for the electronic health record system will be higher amount than the other one. The cost and amount of electronic health record system will depend upon the size of the hospital . The management has to decide about the budget for the organization. (Swab, & Ciotti, 2010). The organization must evaluate its mission and goals in light of its particular strengths and weakness and in light of the demand for services and competition in the external environment. Based on that evaluation it can make a plan that will take advantage of opportunities like Electronic health record implementation according to the goals of an organization.(Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007).

To better understand where my facilities progress is concerning EHR’s, I will first explain the six step process in implementing an EHR. In the first step, an organization must assess their preparedness to initiate an EHR. This includes their

The health center made sure the EHR was easy to implement and wanted it to emphasize quality measurement while creating business workflow to ensure quality input standards. After the implementation, the SCHC staff attended a mandatory 3-week training, organized & taught by the hospital staff. The training was job specific,

Hence, EHR 's are inherently complex amalgamations of diverse subsystems targeted toward varied users. The stakeholders are the users and must have a role in implementing any IT or EHR system into its work flow. An EHR can be customized to accommodate any environment depending on the level of expertise of the vendor and how long they have been in the business of creating an optimum system that 's customized to fit the organizations needs. For the most part, EHR 's must be designed for efficient, error free use. Ideally, an EHR is a system that encompass all the subsystems that make a hospital meet "meaningful use" criteria to acquire incentives for adopting EHR into practice. In the next five years, EHR adoption will no longer be a luxury, it will be a "MUST". EHR 's and other health information technology will be a necessity to practice medicine (econsultant.com, 2010). Rather than purchase several standalone systems, it would behoove one , in my opinion , to purchase an EHR that would satisfy all the needs of the stakeholders, the physician , nurses and other hospital staff and all parties involved in the tertiary practice too. Although LWMS 's budget is not large enough to accommodate the full cost of implementing an EHR,

Anita Ground also stresses on the huge importance of this planning stage by using a concept of system life cycle. It consists of feasibility study, analysis, design, programming, implementation, and lastly maintenance (Ground, 2011, VA TMS training material). The analysis phase in particular would coincide with what the author Yoshihashi is presenting in figuring out office strategy and researching EHR options. Identification of stakeholders and system requirement would play a critical role in EHR adoption (Ground, 2011). Stakeholders would include patients, family, clinicians, billing, registration, and coding as well as the external users such as Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Bottom line is that the new system being purchased would need to provide meaningful use to the clinic based on the current certification standards.

In efforts to reform the United States healthcare system and create a nationally unified data exchange system the federal government has established an incentive program to eligible professionals and hospitals. The federal government has turned to certified electronic health record (EHR) technology to help facilitate the process of broadening health IT infrastructures. The federal government views EHR system used in meaningful ways as the key to reforming the healthcare systems. Meaningful use of the EHR systems can also improve the overall quality of healthcare, insure patient safety, as well as reduce the cost of healthcare to individuals (Bigalke & Morris, 2010, p. 116).

Besides identifying the objectives required to qualify for meaningful use, we must also consider the Ambulatory care practice’s key goals of streamlining registration, billing and improving the patient record documentation process. The project team should diagram and process map the current as well as the new proposed work flow to determine their specific needs and define objectives. When considering an EHR vendor, it is suggested that the Ambulatory care practice be able to demo the product with specific scenarios applicable to the

A wave of medical errors and patient deaths caused by healthcare providers renewed the search for a viable EHR system in 2000. Electronic health records would allow "providers to make better decisions and provide better

The pre-implementation phase is the fundamental part of the EHR project because it concentrates on activities that facilitates its success. It includes assessment of processes, structural, performance features, and uniformity systems of health care facility for the strength of the network connection. Moreover, the pre-implementation phase involves developing an appropriate roadmap to the EHR project. Once the need for EHR is established, a set of essential elements should be involved, like, assessment, suitable planning for implementation, defining the need for EHR and choosing a vender, implementation and providing relative support procedures, final assessment for the system, enhancement, maintenance, and full EHR support

The rapid development of technology is directly impacting the design and direction of the EHR. As medical devices are smaller and more user friendly, patients are being involved in reporting and this will be incorporated into the EHR. In addition to technological changes, EHRs have evolved in relation to consumer needs. Originally the EHRs were focused

Drew Madden is a Healthcare IT entrepreneur who is passionate about Electronic Medical Records and also building high caliber teams that are unique and attractive to corporate culture, and trusted partnerships with clients. Drew has spent over a decade collaborating with the talented stakeholders in the industry to implement, optimize, managing, troubleshoot, and advise on complex challenges accompanying an EMR project. His unique ability to infuse technical EMR background, his experience in project management and consulting operations, enable healthcare IT leaders to build successful implementation teams. He holds a B.S.E. in Industrial Engineering majoring in Medical Systems from the University

Implementation Phase: This stage accepts that reasonable desires were produced. In the event that doctors and other key office staff are oversold on what the new framework will do, the framework is bound to be viewed as no less than a halfway disappointment. The EHR champion must help the training set reasonable desires for the effect on beginning profitability amid the early framework usage stages. Amid the usage of an EHR, rehearse profitability will at first decay, regardless of how great the framework and what the