The outcome of SHARC negotiation was a win win. Both recreational tours and recreation competition work out great with the large and small commercial. We were all on the same page about the issues that we need to discuss. The negotiation went well and everyone was friendly and nice throughout the whole way. We all listen to each other and our concerns were the same. At the end we just wanted everything to work out with everyone. Overall, this last negation was good.
At the same time, I also realized that the negotiation partners are not always having the conflict interests during the negotiation. In this case, for some of the issues, we actually have the same goals. So baring this in mind, in the future negotiation case, I would first seek the common goals for both of us first to create a win-win situation.
1. How did you plan for the negotiation? Explain how you decided on a strategy?
Last fall, my wife and I put our home up for sale. Our motivation was simple, with the money we would get from the sale of our home we could pay off all our debt and have plenty of money left over to invest, eventually saving enough to buy a bigger home. Emboldened by the allure of liquidity I listed our home for sale and waited for the offers. Indeed the offers did come in, in fact over the next few months we were in and out of escrow three times.
Gina Blair represented a competitive-cooperative negotiation strategy which represented a middle ground, both combined in a style which was open minded but assertive. Gina had scheduled the telephone meeting between herself and Daniel Trent; therefore she had more knowledge about what was going to be discussed. As she had initiated the negotiation she had prepared well for the issues concerning her clients. She presented her negotiation in a logical structure, showing that she had prepared all the areas of concern which she intended to address. Her preparation allowed her to identify and prioritise her client’s concerns. She avoided small talk and was very direct, her approach was assertive and she projected confidence. She had a clear understanding of the issues which were of concern to her clients and had proposed
Firearms are a very profound subject to speak about due to violence and other issues behind them. College students are already aroused and stressed to do extraordinary in their courses. Would consenting untrained students to carry concealed weapons around campus be such an enticing idea, when at any moment someone could lose their mind and go on a shooting rage? One may never know what kind of background that specific being that carries a concealed firearm has. In reality no one knows what kind of effect this would have towards universities or college campuses, but it could result in a students’ academic performance. Weapons on university campuses would create a vast interference towards the education of college students; an individual might never know who is carrying a concealed weapon or what that person might organize to do. Students would be alarmed to speak up in class or anywhere around the campus for that matter. Concealed Weapon Carry should not be allowed in universities because students are immature, it would be a risky environment, and permit holders are not always lawful citizens.
Going into this negotiation as the VP of operations my goal was to primarily succeed in buying the restaurant. Prior to starting the negotiation, i identified several certain non monetary concessions that could be made to sweeten the deal such as paying a percentage of travel expenses, and also allowing the restaurant owner
The next three issues we negotiated were editorial control, preproduction budget, and post production schedule. Again we logrolled with the issues and came to an agreeable decision. The outcome of the negotiation of this particular bundle was evenly distributed. I felt that the director was willing to collaborate with me on these issues. I wanted the entire negotiation to follow the concept of the integrative negotiation process by setting the tone of the negotiation as a win-win. Reflecting on how the negotiation was going to this point I felt that I may have conceded on more of the issues than the director, but the hope was that the director would concede on the issues that were important to me. I felt I was sensitive to the director’s
Summary: This was a multiparty negotiation, which involved 6 players all with very different negotiation styles. It was an exercise in which teams easily form a coalition. There were concessions about the value added each team would bring to the “table”, and my team in a situation of power saw how negatively the other teams reacted in name of fairness and how important was to share the pie.
1) Was this a Distributive or Integrative negotiation?- was it the optimum approach and why or why not.
Hiro' intention has wanted to response well between his mom and his fiancé. American gavorment wants to put restriction to the new immigrant who are coming from Mexico. Hiro was stress about his solution so he feels trap in this situation. Me and my husband sometimes we fight each other over something but we don't want to any interference at all. i can't take care permanently my own so they have to take care of themselves when they grow up. when i just came to the united state i had hard time to adjust the weather. nobody has a perfect a relationship but if the tell you that they are having a perfect relationship they are lying to you. dog i s type of pet that they have more loyalty than the other pet if the owner take care them well. when
In today’s competitive scenario, achieving successful results through negotiations has become more important. But often negotiations face either complete failures or achieve far less than its actual potential. Also, such unsuccessful negotiations may perennially damage the reputation and relationships amongst the counterparties involved.
When I compared with other cases I could see how we negotiated in a less stressful way and did focus on the problem and not on positions. And I think we learnt a lot of things for the following cases that ended up more open and with a focus on the problem.
Negotiating is a practice that allows for two sides to reach common ground and agree upon a specific settlement or transaction. During this at times complicated process, the bargaining sides develop a measure together to move forward in their business process. As a lead negotiator of a small firm, the research and analysis of the sought after contract has to be thoroughly conveyed to the U.S. Government. The small business’s negotiating team should be very familiar with the federal negotiating team and all that the federal government is expecting from the product they desire. As there are hundreds of competitors out there, it is safe to assume that there are multiple products out there. However, the negotiating firm of the small business must use different negotiating gambits and pay particular attention to the body language and examine the language used during the entire process.
Negotiation is all about a strategy. The end result is usually to end a problem that someone is having, whether it is personally or
According to Halpert et al.’s Path model, negotiation consists of different phases such as preparation, differentiation, exploration, and exchange. The preparation phase in our previous negotiation became an essential part that played a role of evaluation of both parties positions in our successful outcome.