SHARP in the Military Work Force Essay

Army leaders must balance the link between the Army’s culture and it’s climate and institutional practices. When there is a proper balance it has a huge impact on the mindset of the Army’s Soldiers. Their actions or inactions impacts the five key attributes of the profession, and the four fields of expertise, and have long term effects on the Army’s culture and climate. These actions influence Soldiers’ perceptions that they are serving professional who have answered the call of service to the republic, it is important that Soldiers understand that their role is a calling and not just a job.

The U.S. Army enforces accountability for many reasons; Inventories, Safety, and Work Procedures, and also just being able to keep track of military personnel's at all times. The Army follow a strict, firm, and structural policy or laws. The way accountability plays its role in the Army, it's like the back bone that holds everything together by keeping chaos or commotion at bay.

Throughout history, the United States Military has faced numerous scandals. From its role in the Vietnam War, to the Iran-Contra Affair, to the Iraq War, to the abuse and denial of due process rights to detainees currently held indefinitely at the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; the Department of Defense has undeniably raised many questions about its ethics and treatment toward both civilians and fellow members of the Armed Forces alike. One recent scandal, which would now appear to be becoming the standard, is that of sexual assault within the military. However, due to a campaign of awareness, grassroots activism, and pressuring elected officials to do what is right, things are now beginning to change.

The chain of command in the United States Army has been an organizational power that has been used for many years now and this story showed just how important and respected it is. At the beginning of this story Lieutenant Megan Davis is furious and talks about how the “straightforward rank system” in the military, seems to be more bureaucratic and complicated than she had ever experienced. She is an active duty military nurse that has been living and working on Fort Alpha, especifically in the Emergency Room (ER). Megan is the “charge nurse” meaning she is in charge and all the other nurses report to her for whatever procedure or medication they need. In the story it talks about how Megan has always loved structure so it was perfect for her joining the army because of the strong hierarchy it has.

Other concerns include the way individuals are treated based on race, gender, and other factors (Singer, 2000; Solomon, 1984). With more women in the Army today, there are concerns about rape and sexual harassment. There are also concerns regarding trust, because some types of soldiers do not feel comfortable trusting their lives to other types of soldiers. While this should not be the case, it often is - and it can be a serious problem because trust is vital for

While these three points are extensively discussed and dissected, it is apparent that the key factor that makes us professionals is the ethical standard that we must hold every individual soldier, from the lowest private to the highest general, to. One of the major points that are missing is what happens when the ethical standard is breeched and how it is dealt with.

I would like to bring awareness, give insight about the actual victims, and possibly educate you about sexual harassment of women in the military. Sexual harassment can be connected to sexual assault, beginning in one form and escalating to another level. The definition of sexual harassment is: unwelcome sexual harassment behavior of a sexual nature that is related to one’s job or work surroundings. Harassers can be male or female. In the military, the soldier can be a supervisor, coworkers, or a third party. But, why have we not heard anything about this issue? As a

Lastly, the paper will examine alternative models for dealing with military sexual assault, comparing those proposed systems with what currently exists, and describing possible benefits, drawbacks, and political roadblocks to changing from the current model.

Rape is not just an issue in the military but; gender discrimination is one as well. This

There have been numerous sex trafficking accusations as well as sexual abuse assault allegations made towards the Contractors, a specific example in Bosnia. Their intentions continue to be unclear and their legality hangs by a thread. In the 90’s, the PMC DynCorp employees received both sex trafficking and slavery accusations , according to the Huffington Post. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-isenberg/pmc-sexual-violence-its-s_b_1240751.html) Media erupted after this scandal and headlines bounced throughout papers. One note being: “ The Absence of Justice: Private Military Contractors, Sex Assault, and the U.S. Government’s Policy of Indifference.” Not only does this title associate the PMC employees and overall company with illegal management, but it also exposes the U.S. military for attempting to hid their faults and otherwise punishment. Further damaging the PMC

The military has become the epicenter for rape and abuse of women, all of which military officials have swept aside with all too little concern. Case after case of rape and sexual harassment are dismissed with little to no investigation made. The women of the military live scared of their male superiors and colleagues, and what they might do. Victims of sexual harassment or rape often see their pursuers honorably discharged and returned to society with no criminal record.

The following paragraphs will summarize the four articles and establish a relationship between them. In the article written by Richard A. Oppel Jr., titled “Army General Apologize to Victims of Misconduct Before Being Sentenced,” the author explains the current ruling of Brigadier General Jeffery Sinclair, who has pleaded guilty of mistreating junior officers, adultery, and soliciting explicit pictures from female soldiers, among other lesser charges. The maximum prison sentence of the General’s crimes is 25 years;

Due to an individual’s position in the military, could that position determine the reason individuals have been able to get away with sexual assault and remain in the military? Does the current issue lie with the military justice system’s view on these types of positions? Could it be an issue with the men in a position of power that make up the top ninety-one percent of the highest-ranking individuals in the military (Chemaly, 2014)? Would this propose the reason why they were able to retire or receive a lesser punishment than those of a lower ranking position? Do the current documented surveys, methods of collecting data and empirical research show the relationship of outcomes consistently mitigated, were of those cases involving high ranking individuals in positions of power?

Sexual assault and sexual harassment is a very large and seems to be never ending problem. The United States Army has made it a top priority to combat sexual harassment across the force by developing and implementing programs in 2008. These programs are ongoing and will continuously evolve until sexual harassment and sexual assault are irradiated from the force.

How effective is civilian control over the armed forces, and how free is political life from military involvement?