Saavador Allende Research Paper

The US irrevocably changed the history of Chile through its intervention in the 1970’s. The intervention destroyed decade’s worth of potential development in Chile (not to mention the deaths of thousands due to installing a murderous dictator), to keep communism out of the Chile, and protect United States business interests. The United States’ interest in a potential intervention in Chile began in 1970, the year Salvador Allende was elected the Chilean President. Allende was a leftist candidate from the Socialist Party of Chile whom Nixon suspected of potentially turning communist. Allende made critical remarks about the United States’ involvement in Latin America, especially their failed invasion of Cuba, the Bay of Pigs. This, combined with

Chile’s economy was effectively owned by US corporation’s, and these corporation’s controlled the country's resources. When Allende nationalized copper the two main American corporation were financially hurt severely and lost a lot of profit. This concerned the US and Nixon worried that Chile was falling under soviet control and communism. One of Nixon’s fears was that the Soviets would have total control in Americas backyard. However, the major reason that the US instigated the overthrow was because the corporations did not want Chile to take over their own resources and use them for their own benefit. The corporations were able to exercise leverage over Allende because Chile was in the middle of an economic depression and Chile was receiving loans from American banks. Once Allende was in power these loans were stopped by US foreign policy and of course Chile suffered economically . At this point,

According to Garreton, the oppositions had successfully created a political front that aggregated enough support for an alternative to the current regime. This resulted in a democratization in Chile that was also free and repressive. Chile had a pacted transition which was actor-centered. This transition to democracy was repressive in that the elections were started from the top down, only once the elites and the official agreed to hold an election was there any form of a transition. As O’Donnell described it, it is ironically non-democratic because these pacts are negotiated among small numbers of elites. It was also repressive in that once Chile was democratized it delayed truth and justice. Those that were involved in many of the atrocities did not serve jail time because of the amnesty laws. However, this transition was also free because it resulted in elections that allowed for the public to decide whether or not they were going to transition to democracy. These elections were also free in that they were inclusive and also non-violent. This then resulted in a stable democratic government that was bred through both freedom and

Do you think if Eldred got indoor sport fields they would profit the youth and Eldred? Yes, because a lot of people would use them, and they would bring in some money! The indoor sports fields would let kids practice all year, they could earn money for the Otto-Eldred High School and the town of Eldred, and they could help our school sports programs. Also having indoor fields could keep kids active during any season and during any weather. Having indoor baseball, softball, and football fields in Eldred could help people be active and participate in activities.

During 1973, Chilean Congress and Judiciary took a stand against Allende and it was claimed that Allende’s governmental rule broke the Chilean constitution. After the battle with congress, the military stormed Allende’s palace and killed Allende while armed. In modern times, millions of people were inspired by Allende’s road to socialism and believers found it necessary to argue on the lesson but, furthermore on Allende’s behalf. On the other hand, the Chilean Communist Party thought the presidential rule of

The investigation, which evaluates the tactics used by the CIA and of the 40 committee, delves into how the president of Chile, Salvador Allende, was refrained from gaining political power and the tactics used to destabilize the government after his election in 1970, this evaluation will try to answer the question: To what extent was the involvement of the United States government and the CIA responsible for the downfall of Salvador Allende?

Central America's everlasting theme of violence, drugs and poverty influence the way many see as a culture of darkness and crime. The great leader of Panama, Manuel Antonio Noriega, was born in Panama City, Panama on February 11, 1934. Noriega’s early path seemed to be winding its way towards failure after being born into a very poor family and abandoned at the age of 5. These emotional and physical hardships could have determined the rest of his life, but Noriega did not allow these events to shape his future. Through hard work and sacrifice, he was awarded a scholarship to the Chorrillos Military School in Lima, Peru, one of the most renowned high schools in all of Central America.3 His major in education was military intelligence and counterintelligence.4

Although the United States pushed an aggressive rhetoric against communism developing in the Americas during the Cold War, the overthrow of Allende in 1973 was only an episode that showed the United States’ fear of nationalization and the increasing calls for economic independence in Chile and Latin

The 1973 Chilean military coup d’état was politically and materially supported by the U.S. government and it’s Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA has previously disclosed prior knowledge of the plot that overthrew Salvador Allende but despite incriminating documentation revolving around President Nixon and Henry Kissinger, the CIA denies direct involvement by the U.S government in the events that followed. On the 11th of September 1973, the Chilean Armed Forces under the command of General Augusto Pinochet began the overthrow of the democratically elected Socialist President Salvador Allende. Under Pinochet's reign, 250,000 people were detained,

President Allende was leading the country to its demise, with his socialist reforms. Allende first ran for president in 1952 but he was expelled temporarily from the communist party, for he had accepted the support of outlaw communists. He was later elected President in 1970. He was an extremist, evidence of this is that he was expelled of the communist party temporarily. In addition to my past claim he was not willing to negotiate with foreign companies for some sort of agreement between them and the workers, better wages, less hours or simply to make the company pay more taxes. He had quite a resentment for countries like the U.S/powerful nations. As president he requisitioned American owned companies, specially mines. These actions created tension with the U.S and it weakened the trust foreign investors had in Chile’s economy. Not only did foreign investment stop but the wealthy

Repeated miscommunications and an inability to have discourse resulted in fewer and fewer people willing to compromise. The tensions between the right and the left wing parties were getting to the point illustrated in the protest scene. The parties were no longer cooperating and listening to one another and were simply talking past one another. Once this occurred Allende was no longer able to get anything done, resulting in the democratic breakdown of Chile. Much like there was a breakdown between the two classes because they no longer listened to one another and were too focused on what they wanted and not what was best for the public good. We can learn a lot from this movie and also what happened in Chile at this time. We need to be able to know one another and understand where each of us is coming from. Without this we will only talk past one another and not listen to what we each of us is

Located between the Andes Mountains and the Pacific Ocean, Chile is a narrow but large country in south western South America. Chile declared its independence from Spain in 1818 and was stable throughout the 19th century. During the mid-1900’s, Chile saw a large economic and territorial increase, however by 1960 they were experiencing extreme political mayhem. This mayhem lasted through the Cold War and impacted the country of Chile immensely. In 1961, US President John F. Kennedy helped to establish the Alliance for Progress. This attempted to bring reform and development to Chile and other Latin American areas. When Salvador Allende came to power he brought socialist ideas to the government, and although he denied that he was associated with

In contrast Pinchot used his power to install a military dictatorship, controlling the population and introducing a new economic structure, while also reversing the changes Allende inforced. Under Pinochet’s rule, the growth brought on by free-market reforms did not improve the standard living among Chile’s lower class (pinochet,1973). Whereas under Allende the majority of the population, were beginning to experience a new social economic order where the lives for ordinary people were improving. The measures of Pinochet’s economic success are presented to us via higher GDP and decreased inflation, which tells us nothing about non-economic factors such as literacy rate, life expectancy or public health. Higher GDP does not mean an increase of living standards and quality of life; therefore policies aimed at maximising GDP are not pertinent . Using ambiguous terms such as ‘political stability’ and ‘economic improvement’ it can be acknowledged that Pinochet brought about some improvements. However, the repression and human rights violations, in my opinion reveal that any successes are ineffective, as they have no real positive impact on the lives of the majority. Chile is now being described as the most unequal country. The Pinochet government has made the country more unstable, between those who justify the dictatorship and those who trust in

These conservatives were so determined to overthrow Allende by the coup; they had the CIA and the United States government use all of its power to cut off any sort of connections Allende’s government possessed such as international credit. On September 11, 1973, Chilean army rushes into the streets of Chile. Allende refused to indulge in such activity, ended up dying at his own will, and was successfully overthrown by the coup. Due to Chile becoming the leading example of the Latin American toward military dictatorship, a trend began.

The Concertación was a coalition of center-left political parties in Chile, including prominent groups like the Social Democrats and Christian Democrats. It was formed in 1988 as a collaborative effort to win the 1988 Referendum, in which the nation voted on whether or not it wanted General Pinochet to rule for another eight years. The coalition won the proceeding election of 1990 and would remain in power until 2010, when rightist President Sebastián Piñera would be elected. The Concertación gained the presidency by promising social change—income redistribution, improved labor standards, and recognition of the regime’s oppression—and the return of the civil liberties that had been repressed under Pinochet. However, after the coalition’s election, and prior to taking power, it “pledged to institutionalize the dictatorship’s economic model, and make no dramatic changes to the country’s social structures” (Taylor 113). In an effort to make a smooth transition into democracy, various presidents of the Concertación made concessions and restricted their political planning to fit the institutional structures already in place, an example of “consensus building” (“The Tradeoff of Labor”). Thus, Pinochet’s neoliberal policies remained standing. Little progress was made in labor reform and