preview

Sacco And Vanzetti Case

Good Essays

The roaring twenties were a fun decade for america a rebirth after world war one and celebration of a growing and thriving country. It was not all celebration however, there was a dark and prejudiced side of America during this time which was especially dark for the infamous pair Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. After a string of burglaries and then a double homicide took place involving two Italian men near Sacco and Vanzetti around Charlestown Massachusetts stakes were high for the recover the criminals. Unfortunately after 20 days of searching the pair came in contact with a car linked to the crime and fitting the description as two Italian men they were arrested on May 5th 1920 (Stark) . Both men were not only foreign immigrants but …show more content…

Lots of newspaper printed their antiradical opinion and dirtied Sacco and Vanzetti’s names and published about how they dodged the military draft, and how they both were carrying guns during the time of their arrest. The Department of Justice even released propaganda to excite and unify the public against radicals (Russell). Already the case was being judged in advance by the people who did not even know the evidence. Judge Thayer told the jurors to have confidence and most interpreted that as to not be afraid and have the courage to convict the men (2). The trial lasted 35 days and as Sacco and Vanzetti were tried they were put in shackles and questioned in a steel cage in the courtroom (a somewhat common practice in Massachusetts), however this being treated as criminals gave a bad first impression and worsened the juror preconceived bias’ against them (Streissguth). Though the American opinion was somewhat sway during the trial, most including the jurors joined the bandwagon of hating foreign radicals which further stacked the odds against the innocent pair. For this particular case there around 180 witnesses to testify but there was an acute disagreement for almost every key witnesses’ testimony (Stark). For example while one witness saw Sacco caning fish across town, another witness saw him at a restaurant with Vanzetti while another saw him at the scene of the crime (Sacco and Vanzetti Trial). There was confusion about how they got away as well, though the prosecution determined they did not drive a getaway car witnesses testified see Vanzetti driving away. Several witnesses could not identify Vanzetti when he was only 10 feet away from them but one woman gave a thorough and perfect description after seeing him for one second out of a two story window (2). Another woman

Get Access