Sack Sentence Completion Test

Within this assignment there will be a clear demonstration and understanding of the concept of research in relation to the acquisition of underpinning knowledge appropriate to my programme of study. I will also be undertaking a comparative analysis of the nature and validity of quantitative and qualitative research methods. I will also be demonstrating skills in critical analysis of methods of data collection and selection of appropriate methods to informing future working practice. I will also be analyse the ethical considerations in relation to the development and undertaking of research.

Researchers are sometimes using Quantitative and Qualitative research methodologies interchangeably, or all three of the methodologies including the mixed approach, Creswell (2009). However, the most distinctive differences between the two is the application used, or the design, using words for qualitative analysis, and

A mixed methodology is generally the process of collecting, examining, and combining both qualitative and quantitative information obtained in a single study or in multiple series of scientific research. The example of research on poor housing facilities in a community can involve the combination of the methods of research I human services field (Cozby et al., 1989). Summary of how scientifically sound research can help support the function of human

Qualitative research reflects different ways that researcher’s collect data and explore all of the information through literature review. Participant’s that are reviewing is often observed for analysis while “the role of the researcher focuses as the primary data collection instrument necessitates the identification of personal values, assumptions and biases at the outset of the study; Qualitative researchers ask at least one central question” (Creswell, 2014, which can be explored in several contexts with further questions. According to the text Research Design (2014) “the researcher’s role is typically involved in a

Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

When it comes to crime and justice research ethics plays a major role in how it is carried out. There is a code of ethics that describes how research should be administered. This code stands on the principles and guidelines generated by “professional organizations to oversee research practices and simplify the line between ethical and unethical conduct” (Kraska & Neuman, 2012). The purpose of this paper is to address issues involving research participants. It will show the importance of adhering to ethical standards when conducting research and the consequences of what can happen in criminal justice research when these standards of behavior are not maintained

Our country was founded on certain moral principles. The moral principles which guide our lives are referred to as ethics. These ethics have an impact on how we interact with the world around us and shape our personalities; this happens even if we do not realize their immediate impact. It is for this very reason that ethics in psychological research became necessary. “One may also define ethics as a method, procedure, or perspective for deciding how to act and for analyzing complex problems and issues” (Resnik, 2011). We are expected to behave or be treated a particular way in society, therefore we should be granted certain ethical treatments in regards to research.

Quantitative and qualitative research styles will both be used to increase the validity of the study, Parahoo (2006) agrees with this and describes this method as triangulation, incorporating a positivist approach. De Poy and Gitlin (2011) and Bryman (2012) agree with this and express that using a mixed methods approach gives a further comprehensive knowledge of the research method and conjoining the two can complement each other. Furthermore, Larkin et al (2014) state that the intention of mixed methods research is to improve confidence in findings, increase understanding in healthcare and ensure all groups in society are listened to. Moreover, Gelling, L (2014) found that the use of both approaches makes a great

A mixed methods research design is a procedure for collecting, analyzing, and “mixing” both quantitative and qualitative research and methods in a single study to understand a research problem.

Mixed methods research is a research design that includes qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis to provide a better understanding of complex research problems. This method takes the benefit of using multiple ways to explore a research problem in a single or a longitudinal inquiry. The mixed method approach usually has a primary goal, but there are at least two research questions, and each of which requires a different type of approach. The researchers may either ask descriptive questions and affirmative questions in order to examine causative effects in quantitative component, but can clarify on casual instruments in a qualitative component (Polit & Beck, 2014).

When utilizing a qualitative approach, the task becomes one of determining the qualitative method to be used. Additionally, Stake (2010) used purpose, research design, and methodical data techniques as a way of classifying types of qualitative research. Similarly, Cresswell & Cresswell (2007) spoke of five practices of qualitative research. These five practices consist of biography, phenomenological study, grounded theory study, ethnography, and case study. This researcher chose a phenomenological study for this research project.

In order for this research project to be conducted properly and successfully, a qualitative research design has been followed. More specifically, it is suggested that a qualitative research methodology is adopted when researchers want to examine more complicated issues and topics that cannot be captured through another way or methodological process. In such circumstances and research area topics, researchers use qualitative methodologies to delve into the deeper thoughts and lived experiences of the participants, as well as to understand the ways that people make sense of the world around them and of the specific issue addressed. In addition, this type of methodology usually fosters the narration of participants’ own stories, which would

When both research designs are used together, more information can be gathered. Mixed methodology uses the numerical portion of the quantitative study design in combination with the descriptive aspect of the qualitative study. There are many similarities between these two designs, which make them compatible with each other.

"With the development and perceived legitimacy of both qualitative and quantitative research in social and human sciences, mixed methods research, employing the combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches, has gained popularity." (Creswell, p. 203). Describe the development of mixed methodology in educational research. Discuss the steps that need to be taken to develop a viable mixed methods research study.

This research is qualitative in its approach and it is grounded in phenomenology (Glasser & Strauss, 1967; Lincoln & Guba, 1985). A phenomenological philosophy is founded on the belief that the personal, individual accounts of research participants are important primary research sources of knowledge (Glasser & Strauss, 1967; Lincoln & Guba, 1985). The methods used in this research study are primarily those of grounded theory (Glasser & Strauss, 1967; Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Grounded theory or naturalistic research is based on the assumptions that themes emerging from an exploration and analysis of the data will provide insight into the perceptions, beliefs, opinions, and experiences of the study participants (Glasser & Strauss, 1967; Lincoln & Guba, 1985). The research is not based on a formulated hypothesis which will be tested, nor does the research begin with preconceived ideas about which themes are important (Glasser & Strauss, 1967; Lincoln & Guba, 1985). The qualitative researcher does not look for particular themes so much as anticipate that themes will emerge (Glasser & Strauss, 1967; Lincoln & Guba, 1985). A researcher using a grounded theory approach examines the rich, thick narrative accounts that are received from the study participants and, through an iterative process, observes that patterns emerge (Glasser & Strauss, 1967; Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Expert knowledge is used by the researcher to explore the data and with an open mind