Sales of Illegal Goods on the Internet Essay example

Moreover gun control supporters state that it is more difficult to buy a medicine than to order ammunition online from your home. In the article “Just how easy is it to buy a gun over the Internet?” published in The Washington Post by Brad Plumer. The author explains that even though the Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits the direct shipping of firearms, there are sellers that are “willing to sell their guns even when researchers explicitly stated that they ‘probably couldn’t pass a background check’ ”. This shows the weakness of the current gun regulations and the need for stronger and efficient laws that reduces murder rates. Supporters of gun control say that banning guns is the key to prevent massacres in public places or institutions. If there were no guns, psychopaths would not have all that deadly artillery to kill people. Also many people believe that the second amendment is not relevant anymore.

With the Gun Control Act of 1968, the Firearm Owners Protection act of 1986, The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, etc, all of these regulations have proved to not stop gun violence. The regulations all hinder the access of guns to people abiding the laws, but not to the illegal trade of guns. Dr. Daniel Webster the Director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research found in the least stricter states only 28.9% of gun violence perpetrators would have been denied a gun from the most strictest of states. He also goes on to say that, “40% of the inmates had illegally obtained a gun with only 13% of them getting them from a pawn

“Gun control laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns or breaking law,” as said in Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted?. Yes, this is true, but legally owned guns are frequently stolen, which will eventually, land in the hands of a criminal. A report from Institute of Medicine (IOM) states that “[a]lmost all guns used in criminal acts enter circulation via initial legal transaction.” In other words, guns were stolen, but the guns were bought legally. Between 2005 and 2010, 1.4 million guns were purloined for just US homes during property crimes, a yearly average of

In the legal and illegal use of firearms, some ways of obtaining and the selling of guns are shocking and others are well known. Children, teens, and adults all have ways to obtain a firearm even if they are underage or do not pass a mandatory back-ground check, which causes

According to a report by the Switzerland-based Small Arms Survey, the United States has about 35-50 percent of the world’s civilian-owned guns and has less than 5 percent of the world’s population. With no restriction and so much freedom, firearms can be distributed throughout the United States illegally and obtained as easy as buying it from a person, disregarding all gun laws. Implementing stricter background checks can help reduce the amount of crime relating to gun violence. It can also keep firearms away from those who shouldn’t have possession of them.

Controlling the availability of guns or even banning guns completely will not rid us of the crime problem that we face in this country.

The first thing is that assault weapons can be bought and sold illegally online and in person, but mainly

By making the process Americans must go through to acquire these guns stricter, the number of shootings that occur in this country can greatly decrease.

It should be clear to us all that if we eliminate the 14% of guns that were obtained from legal dealers we will eradicate all violent crime involving firearms. Of course, it goes without saying that everyone owning a gun, including criminals, will eagerly line up to turn their guns into the authorities with this social victory assured. It also goes without saying that illegal sources of guns will wither and disappear in the face of this social unity. Further, we all know that there is no way that the people who sell guns illegally would be able to get their hands on merchandise after a ban on gun ownership.

buying and selling guns cannot make this situation any worse of what it is now because criminals will

Hence, many would believe that gun purchases would plummet; however, the opposite has occurred. Gun manufacture has risen around 40% since then. These correlations show that the access to guns do not contribute to the violence. Another scenario many pro-Gun Control advocates dismiss is how the crime guns are obtained. In a study conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, data has shown around 79% of crime guns are obtained through friends/family or street/illegal sources; thus, if the criminals wanted to acquire firearms they will find a source. In the BJS’ survey only 8.3% of the offenders bought their guns from a retail store. The government can only prevent these delinquents from obtaining guns in registered sources like retail stores, pawn shops, flea markets, and Federal Firearm License (FFL) certified gun shows. The other option is to take away the 226 year old right to “bear arms” created by our Founding Fathers. Instead of taking away prerogatives of the United States civilians, the government should target illegal selling, purchasing, and trading of

For a nation as advanced as the United States the death of thousands of people each year is an issue affecting and concerning every American. With this problem occurring almost every year, the question of whether or not gun licenses can guarantee the safety of citizens throughout the country has been raised. With the number of deaths created by firearms each year, the need for enforcing stricter gun-control laws has grown increasingly. In addition, with the amount of fear throughout the country, and concern for protection, many people are beginning to buy firearms through simple and easy ways. Throughout America there are numerous ways for citizens to find and purchase weapons, whether it is in a gun store or online, the possibilities are endless.

A black market makes a lot of money off illegally sold firearms and would benefit from stricter laws. Regardless of the firearm is legal or illegal, the black markets all over America have sold them. This would only increase if more firearms were made or illegal or harder to acquire. To enforce the laws over black markets would be difficult. Already, the markets operate under current laws, regardless that it isn’t allowed. The government would have to take a lot of steps and spend tons of resources and manpower to find and stop

Koper, called Crime Gun Risk Factors: Buyer, Seller, Firearm, and Transaction Characteristics Associated with Gun Trafficking and Criminal Gun Use. Before going through the transactions, perhaps doing mental health assessment before selling it and reducing guns shops to having one primary market in each main cities with proper infrastructures of strict laws and regulation, where no one can bribe the seller for illegal transactions. Secondary market should be banned, although they are prohibited from knowingly transferring guns to ineligible purchasers who could be convicted felons and drug abusers, but absurdly secondary transfers are not subjected to federal record-keeping and background check requirements, hence making the secondary market predominantly unregulated and, as a consequence, a better source of guns for criminal

How can traditional (or old media) enterprises such as film, television and music overcome the threat of online piracy and file sharing?