Salinger's Franny and Zoey Essay

Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye has been into continuous dispute and controversy since its publication in 1951. Some critics think that Salinger 's narrative of the human plight is engrossing and enlightening, yet incredibly depressing. The leading character, Holden Caulfield, serves as the basis for critical discussion due to his psychological conflict. Salinger 's portrayal of Holden, which encloses incidents of dejection, nervous breakdown, impulsive spending, sexual exploration, and other wandering behavior, have all assist to the controversial nature of the novel. Yet the novel is praised by its piercing advocates, who argue that it is a critical look at the problems facing American youth during the 1950 's.

Henry, opposed to Fitzgerald's idea, believed that Glass was the sole reason why they are still alive. Instead, Henry offered a monetary deal to anyone who wants to stay with Glass. He insisted to have them wait for Glass' death and provide a proper burial for him. When the others left, Fitzgerald aimed to suffocate Glass, but his son, Hawk saw Fitzgerald and tried to stop him. Fitzgerald ended up stabbing Hawk in front of Glass. The next day, Glass found himself lying on the ground and saw his son lifeless. The rising action started the moment Glass woke up after spending the night beside his dead son. Despite the fact that he was feeble, Glass was determined to proceed by crawling. Man vs Self, is another major conflict in the movie. Glass knew that he was going to have a hard time with his body. Yet, his weak body didn't block his determination to keep moving

The Glass Castle tells a childhood story full of growing up with irresponsible parents, moving non-stop, and living in poverty. Jeannette and her siblings had to deal with situations that no one should have to go through. Her parents- the artistic but selfish Rose Mary and the intelligent but alcoholic Rex- neglect their kids and fail to provide for them. Jeanette and her siblings had to learn to provide for themselves, and are forced to mature at an early age to survive.

The Glass Castle is a memoir written by Jeannette Walls. An interesting novel, it switches back and forth between Jeannettes childhood adventures and her current life in New York City. During the childhood adventures, she describes growing up with her mom, Rosemary Walls; her father, Rex Walls; and her three siblings, Lori, Brian, and Maureen Walls. Invariably short on food and money, life is not easy in this family. Neither of her parents can maintain a steady job, resulting in no income for the family.

In The Glass Menagerie, Tennessee Williams uses the theme of escape to help drive the play forward. None of the characters are capable of living in the real world. Laura, Amanda, Tom and Jim use various methods to escape the brutalities of life. Laura retreats into a world of glass animals and old records. Amanda is obsessed with living in her past. Tom escapes into his world of poetry writing and movies. Jim also reverts to his past and remembers the days when he was a high school hero. Mr. Wingfield is referred to often throughout the play. He is the ultimate symbol of escape. This is because he has managed to remove himself from the desperate situation that the rest of the family is still

The Glass Castle written by Jeannette Walls is a memoir about her early years and her family situation. Throughout the story you learn about her Father Rex, her Mother Rose, and her three siblings Loir, Maureen, and Brain. With each story she tells it conveys such emotion and feeling. The theme of the memoir starts with a hopeful tone the transforms to a somber tone, this is conveyed through imagery, language and dialogue.

Jeanette Walls memoir, the Glass Castle, illustrates Jeanette’s unusual childhood caused by constant poverty and chaos of her dysfunctional parents. This memoir teaches you to be thankful for what you have and to never give up no matter how hard things get. The Glass Castle tells a childhood story full of growing up with irresponsible parents, moving non-stop, and living in poverty. Jeannette and her siblings had to deal with situations that no one should have to go through.

The glass menagerie symbolizes Amanda Wingfield's overwhelming need to cling to her past and her fulfilled fear of being alone.  Amanda resents the poverty-stricken neighborhood in which she lives so

With regard to The Glass Menagerie, the character that I have chosen with regard to the desires that they have in the course of their life as shown in the play is Tom. In the play, the character of Tom was

Written in 1951, J.D. Salinger’s, The Catcher in the Rye continues to be a popular book amongst Americans. Although The Catcher in the Rye has been banned in many public school settings in the United States it continues to stay atop some of the greatest books of all time lists. Whether people are in their teens or in their fifties they find themselves drawn to Holden Caulfield. At some point in their life they could relate to a sense of alienation, caused by money and wealth. Humans are wired to be jealous and want what others have. Holden Caulfield has the opposite problem, he has money and wealth which he inherited from his hard working parents. However, he himself is not motivated to work hard, graduate prep school and earn his own wealth. Instead he despises hard working students at the many prep schools he drops out of. Holden also has a big number of family complications. An area to explore is how wealth can contribute to feelings of alienation and despair. Holden Caulfield has a complex relationship with money, not wanting to associate from it, but benefiting from it. A further look into the 1950’s may give an insight into the troubled mind of Holden Caulfield.

In the novel Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, the protagonist Holden Caulifield views the world as an evil corrupt place where there is no peace. Holden has a phony phobia that restricts him from becoming a fully matured adult. In Holden's attempted journey in becoming a fully matured adult, he encounters many scenarios involving friendship, personal opinions, and his love of children. His journey is an unpleasant and difficult one with many lessons learned along the way; including the realization that he is powerless to change the world.

Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye has been pronounced a literary classic for its atypical portrayal of adolescence, to effectively convey the protagonist’s alienation and confusion. The introduction of The Catcher in the Rye is underpinned by disorder and confusion through a stream-of-consciousness narration, which digresses from one subject to another. Consequently, Holden’s multitudinous thoughts and feelings appear to lack a cohesive pattern. Additionally, Holden’s prevalent ascription of other students as “phony” (Salinger, p.3) alludes to his alienation and isolation as a form of self-protection; he rejects those he does not understand. Furthermore, the vocabulary encapsulates typical adolescence dialect of the 1940s, and resultantly, alienates contemporary reader. This is typified through Holden’s use of colloquial speech, in particular, his exclamation “that killed me” (Salinger, p.42) to express his amusement. Therefore, the introduction of Holden’s disjointed monologue in The Catcher in the Rye foreshadows Salinger’s unique interpretation of adolescence.

The novel Franny and Zooey by JD Salinger sets the readers’ focus on Franny Glass, who has an emotional breakdown in the first section of the book. At this point, she returns home to her mother, Bessie, and her brother, Zooey. Both of them attempt to understand the cause and meaning behind this meltdown up until the ending of the story, but this proves difficult due to Franny’s lack of communication. She does not open up to anyone until Zooey pulls some information from her about her school life and experiences. Franny seems to have a “holier than thou” attitude to most everyone she meets. This is somewhat hypocritical of her because she is not much different from these people. She does not like egos, but hers appears to be fairly large compared

In 1938, the onset of violent anti-Semitic riots in Germany created one of the most horrific struggles of our time. Not only did this outrageous holocaust bring sadness and death to the Jews in Germany but also to the ones living here in America. In, The Broken Glass, by Arthur Miller, we see the lives of three completely different characters portrayed. First, we see Sylvia Gullberg, who has been a housewife ever since her husband Philip made her quit. She is the first one to be affected by the news in Germany. Her husband, Phillip, has been hiding from his race ever since he was a teen, and because of this ruins his marriage and ultimately his life. Lastly, Dr. Harry Hyman, who views everything with his

As I watched the movie, I noticed a variety of hints that made me question Glass’ character and I was a little frustrated that the other characters weren’t able to pick up on them. I first sensed that Glass was a little odd when he kept downgrading himself and his own work. This begins when Glass is talking to Gloria and he says that his piece is going “Horrible” and moves into a meeting with Amy and Caitlin where he says that they hate his piece, “it’s the worst thing he’s ever wrote”, and that he “might as well kill himself”. This all happening within the first ten minutes of the movie, was causing red flags to pop up in my head, wondering how he could be so self-loathing and dramatic without anyone noticing. As the movie progresses, I can see that Glass is using his self-loathing to manipulate his coworkers into helping him on his papers, dodging discipline from editors, and averting inquisitiveness away from his pieces. One of the key phrases that I noticed he always used was “Did I do something wrong? Are you mad at me?” which usually was reverberated with a resilient “no”. This stressed that he was emotionally manipulating his coworkers in order to get away with his falsified work. All of these actions are what I would consider a ‘flawed’ person. His manipulation, blatant lies, and exaggeration’s are what I believe make him a flawed – especially when he applied it to his line of work.