Same Bystander Effect

This is hard for me to say out loud, since the media has shaped our society to live up to certain expectations based on our

Both events had thirty-eight witnesses. None of these bystanders intervened, meaning the murder could have been prevented in both cases, had they not been examples of the bystander effect.

Why should students help pick up fellow classmate's books that he or she dropped? Why should people give to the homeless? Why should humans become organ donors? Altruism is defined as a person's ability to go out of their way to enhance the welfare of someone else without anything in return. But it's not the "what" of altruism that is intriguing, it's the "why" that is truly fascinating. Scientist and researches may never pinpoint what makes humans exhibit altruistic behavior, but there is one thing that scientist and researches are sure about. Altruism plays an important role in running society, and the world can use more of it.

When there is an emergency, why is taking out our phones to take a picture or video the very first thing we want to do? Why do we casually walk by a person who is in trouble, and go about our business as if we did not anyone? Why do we not help or act when someone is getting, but instead we just stand in a crowd and watch? Why do we bury our moral instincts during emergencies? “We witness a problem, consider positive action, and respond by doing nothing. Why do we not help in these situations and put our moral instincts in shackles” (Keltner & Marsh, 2017). We as people are bystanders to the world around us daily, but the question is why? The answer to all the “why” questions is the bystander effect.

the media, and how this ultimately limits their roles in areas of social life such as politics and

This essay will ‘compare and contrast’ two approaches made in investigating the ‘bystander effect’. It will discuss in some depth as to what exactly is meant by the bystander effect, illustrating when this concept was first shown and why. An outline will be made of the different methods used, those being experiments and discourse analysis, explaining each one in turn, within the framework of two cases. The first being the murder of ‘Catherine Genovese,’ 1964.and the second ‘James Bulger’ 1993. The essay will then show examples of the differences and similarities between each method. Concluding with a summary of findings into the two approaches to investigating the Bystander Effect.

different times) act as if they were is a lot of pain or a drunk. The test was to see how long it took

Think of a situation that happened in this chapter. Explain the situation and explain if you would have done the same thing or something different? Explain.

wrong in any situation or not. He raised some examples to support what he tried to

You have a right to intervene when you see a violent crime happening. Of course you could simply call 911 but why when you could just stop the crime happening right then and there. I mean wouldn’t you want help if you were in trouble?, wouldn’t you want someone to stop the bad guy or whatever the case is?, i’m pretty sure you would want help right? Yes exactly so if you see any crime or anything you should help people that need

People think if no one else is to help why should they, they have a group of people that are not going to help. They know it would be an inconveioce to them and if they help someone they think they "How could I help them? I'm Just

right and wrong share a very thin line. The right decision for some might be wrong for others and vice

be right to some, may be wrong to others. There are no right or wrong

There has always been chaos around the world, but it is different when the one in charge of a country, like the President, is the main cause of the problem. However, the chaos keeps occurring due to the fact that people who are seeing the problem occur do not do anything to help stop the issue; this could also be referred to as, the bystander effect. The bystander effect is when a group of people or just one person is seeing a problem take place, yet does nothing about it other than keep quiet and watch. When the bystander effect occurs, things could get to a level where the problem is uncontrollable, an example of this is the Holocaust. Even though this was a huge part of history, some countries still seem to follow the same footsteps to get

The bystander effect is both a social and psychological phenomenon in which an individual’s inclination towards showing helping behaviours are minimised by the influence of other people. Research has found that the more people acting as bystanders in a situation, the less likely it is that helping behaviours will be demonstrated. However in the correct conditions, where conditioned cues increase self-awareness, it is possible to reverse the bystander effect phenomenon. The bystander effect is prevalent in everyday life, and often decorates the news, shocking the world, especially when authority figures such as police men and women succumb to the effect. Diffusion of responsibility, ignorance of others interpretation of an event and self-consciousness are all social processes which appear to lead to social inhibition of helping behaviours and one of the main theories of the bystander effect is provided Latané and Darley (1970) whose cognitive model provides a series of decisions that can lead to social inhibition. The bystander effect is influenced by the conditions an individual is in when an event occurs, for example the bystander effect appears to be most dominant when an individual is in a group of strangers with low group cohesiveness. FINISH