Same National Curriculum

Having one curriculum would hopefully allow the United States to compete with other nations. The United States is outperformed on international assessments by countries that have high standards (“The Facts on Common Core State Standards”). Dan Domeneon, from the American Association of School Administration, stated “It is going to be very difficult for us to be globally competitive if we continue to have 50 sets of standards when we go off against countries that have only one” (Boulard). This makes perfect sense; how is the United States expected to compete against nations that have one curriculum when the U.S. has 50 different curriculums? But, people have been questioning if changing the curriculum to one national curriculum will improve the United States overall education ranking in the

Changing the method of learning across a nation is an incredibly large undertaking and it must be thought out impeccably to work. The way the Common Core has been enforced in schools has had some issues, causing it to be unsuccessful. One problem with it is that it was not made to adapt to different students, for example some students that might have learning disabilities cannot learn the same ways as students without that disadvantage and the Common Core can’t be adapted for each individual student. In the article “Common Core: An International Failure,” the author says, “Instead of choosing a one-size-fits-all approach to education, education policy makers should turn to the people who actually know their pupils: parents, teachers, and local school districts” (Asbenson 1). Asbenson is saying that teachers must have some say in what and how they teach. The way the Common Core is now, they do not have the luxury of changing the curriculum if they find it necessary. The fact that the Common Core leaves no room to accommodate different students and the ways they learn, makes it difficult to see why it is a better choice than having curriculum differ across the country.

should be a change to the curriculum that can be used through out every school system making it a

There are many approaches that can be taken in order to develop a school’s curriculum, or the material that the students will learn. If there were no federal regulation of curriculum, then it would not be possible to compare student achievement across districts or even states. The federal program, Common Core State Standards, assists in equaling education across the nation. The Common Core has reinvented the perception of student learning which, in turn, has caused American education to become a corporate institution. As a result, there has been a threat to states’ rights for education as more rigorous content has been implemented into classrooms by the government, which ultimately changes the role of the teacher.

Common Core is needed to stabilize education. Through the implementation of Common Core, every child will learn the same thing at the same time. Education throughout the country would be equal and no child would truly be left behind. The theory of Common Core is good, but the implementation so far has not been. Creating an unified teaching curriculum is a great idea for any child who would be moving across the country, or even to another state, mid-school year; that way the student would be able to effortlessly pick up learning right where they left off.

Each state could control what the kids need to know, which will help kids get ready for college (Origins of Federal Control Over Education | Foundation for Economic Education). State controlled curriculum will also help the teachers, as it makes it easier for them to create lesson plans. If they know exactly what they have to teach, it will be easier to create lessons and stick to a particular topic. Another reason it will help is that kids in all schools will be taught the right material (Pros and Cons of Merit Pay for Teachers). Kids from all states and all different types of schools will be able to learn everything that will help them for the real world. If the government were to create it, they could focus on getting them prepared for college and getting a job after

Wiggins & McTighe (2005) said it best “teachers are designers” and we need the right to craft our curriculum and learning experiences to meet specified purposes (Pg. 13. Ch. 1). We are all teaching different students, in different cities, in different states; all of whom that have individual strengths and weaknesses, come from various homes, a multitude of diversified backgrounds, who speak different languages and all of whom who have experienced their lives in different manners. I have been teaching for well over 11 years, and I have never once modified my teaching to meet the needs of a curriculum, I always have and will continue to adapt the curriculum to meet the needs of my students.

Schools must decide how to teach the standardized curriculum. Schools must figure out how to mesh a standardized and non-standardized curriculum. Can students guide their own curriculum and perform well on tests?

Curriculum is designed to develop successful learners. Confident and creative individuals and active and informed citizens (MCEECDYA, 2008, p.13). In 2008, the Australian Government promised to deliver a fair and equitable curriculum for the national’s educational system, taking the task away from the State and Local Governments. The purpose of this was to create an even level of education throughout the country whether in Hobart of Cape York, and to ensure our nations position into the 21st century. This essay will demonstrate the Nation’s curriculum, its structure and development ready for its initial implementation in 2011.

A study conducted in 2003 by Ofsted that involved England, Denmark and Finland, showed England’s national curriculum compared to the other two countries was:

I believe that even though students have the same opportunities and environment in the same exact classroom, they are all still not receiving the same education. This all depends on their mental capacities, the amount of attention they give, and if they understand the assignments and lectures. Everyone can have different experiences and take in different information even though being in the same

While in theory having a national standard for education sounds like a progressive scheme full of possibilities, it has actually lowered our betterment as a society. Reality is not every nation should be taught CCS, studies show that not every nation with Common Core Standards do well at testing - Canada does not have standardized testing and as a nation does very well. This proving that standardized testing cannot be tailored to the diverse nation we have today. The challenge that the Federal government cannot seem to grasp on is that states have a firmer idea on what is needed for their individual

In theory, this is the same idea that Howard County has for their Social Studies curriculum, but unfortunately the continuity in subject matter mastered is not evident and I fear we could go down the same road with Common Core (CCSS). Therefore, curriculum should support continuity within a school system, but often that does not occur.

Guidelines for the National Curriculum are laid down in the Education Reform Act of 1988.

these set out guidelines and rules that schools must follow to be in line with the law. Within the