Same-Sex Marriage Is Unnatural

One of the biggest controversial worldwide issue is gay marriage. The definition of marriage according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary is the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law. Being able to stand firm to my viewpoint in this generation is very hard and totally biased against same sex marriage or just simply homosexual relationships in general because everyone wants to accept everything that gives one satisfying pleasure. As a christian, to me same sex marriage is wrong. In my opinion, marriage is a holy and sacred matrimony created by God, joining a male and female in the eyes of God to make a commitment . Another purpose of marriage, is to create a family in the traditional way which includes reproducing. Many argue that same sex marriage is a right, but they

”since the beginning of civilization, in every known society, governments have recognized a marriage between a man and a woman because it provides the next generation outstanding citizens and is the only means of melding two sexes into a stronger and more complete whole” (Kaufman 164).

In recent years, same-sex marriage has become a more controversial topic on whether it’s right or wrong. People should not feel coerced to agree with something they believe is wrong; clearly, same-sex marriage is immoral and unnatural. Many complications come with same-sex marriages including financial pressures, social pressures, moral pressures, and health risks.

Cherlin concludes that although today’s society focuses on the ideas of independence and institutionalized what marriage once met, the symbol for marriage is just as significant as it was before. Marriage is now “something to be achieved through one’s own efforts rather than something to which one routinely accedes” (50). Cherlin’s overall tone is genuine, in search of an answer to explain the social change. It is informative to the fact that people should understand the change that occurred because of the social norm

In Ralph Richard Banks’ book entitled “Is Marriage for White People?” the definition of marriage varies from different cultures and views. The most popular and idealistic notion is that marriage is a result of the unconditional love of two people wanting to share this union for the rest of their lives, in a long committed way. For some however, marriage is more of an economic arrangement, like a pact for two people to catch each other when the other one falls. And for others, it is only a piece of paper that can be thrown away if not needed, or by simple saying, marriage is not important.

In history the marriage contract or agreement has been guided by moral, social and religious ideals. Today, the local, state and federal governments play a role in marriage, but not in a way of promoting marriage. Suzanne Bianchi and Lynne Casper state “marriage is a relationship between two people of the opposite sex that adheres to legal, moral and social rules … a social institution that rests upon common values and shared expectations for appropriate

From a historical perspective, marriages have always been recognized as important to the security and future of a state (Brake, 2012). Procreation created a labor force and armies, while family units were an efficient method for creating good citizens. For this reason, governments throughout human history have sought to legally sanction and protect marriage in its various forms, as long as the goals of marriage aligned with the goals of the state. In the United States, marriage prior to the 1970s was defined in terms of gender-specific roles and divorce was discouraged by the imposition of sanctions. Well-defined gender roles in marriage and the long-term preservation of the family unit were therefore perceived to be in the best interests of American Society until the 1970s. In the aftermath of the feminist movement, however, gender roles were eliminated and no fault divorce legislation was passed in many states.

Through this conflict, the world has and will continue to evolve into the modern community that we already have begun to live in today. This information is prevalent within the short story “Marriage is a Private Affair.” Although marriage has evolved a great amount in the past into what we know it as today, there are still civilizations that have stuck to their traditional beliefs and are looking to begin their own crusade as to what marriage beliefs should consist

Throughout history, many cultures worldwide have classified marriage as the union of one man and one woman. But tradition does have a malicious side to it, filled with atrocities, violence and exploitation. It includes slavery, the denial of rights to women and the execution of systematic discrimination against minority groups. Integrating and expanding human rights have always shattered tradition and we have typically been better off for it.

“My differences shouldn’t define who I am” (Bily 48). Let us face it, Homosexuals are people just like everyone else. So what, just because they are attracted to the same sex does not make them “extraterrestrial.” That is not the case at all, but surprisingly many people think that way. As homosexuality has become an emerging topic since the Eighties, people have been hitching onto bandwagons about gay marriage being morally wrong. Is it though? Consider this: was this country built off of arguments coming from a bible draped in a plastic, one-sided American flag, that entails such perennial gems as “Adam and eve, not Adam and Steve,” and “Love the sinner, hate the sin” (Frye). From the standpoint of someone who supports gay-rights, then

It seems that ever since gay marriage has been legalized the nation has been buzzing about what is right and what is wrong. The 4 months after gay marriage was legalized, there are still protests going on that it should be wrong and illegal. There are plenty of facts to show that both sides could be right or wrong.

Marriage is a union that has been around for as long as humans have walked the earth. The human race depends upon the union of its members, and as such, the subject of marriage has been an issue that receives more intense scrutiny and attention than many would likely believe. In today's day and age, with humanity continuing to move in a modern direction, many argue that marriage is a union that should be entered into freely and should be based exclusively on the love between two people. However, I argue that arranged marriage, which has taken place throughout the ages and throughout the world, is a union that offers its observers a marriage based in support, longevity and love, and is an institution that should not be frowned upon.

I will argue in support of the statement that “homosexuality is not unnatural in any morally objectionable way.” My argument will be backed by evidence and support by John Corvino. With aid from Burton Leiser, a professor of philosophy at Pace University, Corvino examines several possible interpretations of the term “unnatural” to acknowledge and negate different arguments commonly posed against homosexuality. The five meanings of the term “unnatural” that Corvino investigates are “what is unusual or abnormal is unnatural,” “what is not practiced by other animals is unnatural,” “what does not proceed from innate desires is unnatural,” “what violates an organ’s principle purpose is unnatural,” and “what is disgusting or offensive is unnatural”

Thus the notion of marriage is an historical ancient foundation of man and woman upheld by citizens, elected officials, and policies. A fundamental building block for human civilization defines the history of marriage. However, marriage values and views preexisted before the formation of the American government. Therefore, proclamation of marriage between a man and woman is

Through their articles, Andrew Sullivan and Hope Edelman give their definitions of marriage. Sullivan offers an ideology from the contemporary West that “. . . marriage has become a way in which the state recognizes an emotional commitment by two people to each other for life” (Sullivan 30), where homosexuals are entitled to the right of equality. He