Same Sex Marriage Should Be Legal

On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same-sex couples to marry. Many conservative groups do NOT agree with this decision. The gay marriage debate has been simmering for as long as I can remember. The four articles I have selected give information from four different perspectives including that of liberals, conservatives, homosexuals, and orthodox Jews. With so many differing opinions, one can understand why it's been so hard for the nation to come to agree on this issue.

Learning family advocacy requires students to develop an understanding of contemporary cultural issues surrounding traditional marriage. The struggle over defining marriage was thought to be somewhat settled through the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA); however, as this law’s ramifications were realized, greater debate resulted about the moral, philosophical, and civic repercussions of this legal definition. This paper will provide a better understanding of the historical and worldview changes that occurred within the United States over homosexuality and same-sex marriage (SSM). After gaining a better understanding of these issues, the paper will also provide an exploration of the strengths and weaknesses of DOMA from these differing perspectives. In addition, recommendations will be offered for further changes of law and advocacy that would encourage the altering of current thought intent on stifling the defense of traditional marriage.

A metamorphosis in how the American judicial system perceives same-sex marriage, has developed over the past forty years. In October, 1971, the Supreme Court ruled that: "The institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis.”

The legalization of gay marriage has been a controversial issue in many state courts since the mid 1970s. Gay marriage scares many people because it strays from the norms of heterosexual relationships. Traditional American ideals have become a part of culture and society that everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, or race, or gender, expect to have as a basic human rights. Several times in history these have been identified as inalienable rights. One of the expected rights of many American citizens is the right to choose who they love, who they marry, and how they live their day to day life. When heterosexual Americans were introduced to the idea of same sex marriage, they became afraid that it would “taint the minds of the young members of the community,” since homosexualty was and still is frowned upon in the community. Thus, the homosexual community’s opportunity to freely choose how to live their life is taken

Traditional Christians and religious conservatives feel that the laws initiated by DOMA are necessary and it “raises the bar for providing illegal discrimination in religion -related disputes” (Drehle, D. V. (2015, April 13)). Reasons against gay marriage include the difference between the parenting of gay couple and traditional couples. They suggest that same-sex couples deprive children of a “normal” family structure and that without biological parents, children would have a harder time developing throughout their

America today is gripped in the controversial debate regarding gay rights; specifically, the right for two people who are of the same sex such as a man and man or woman and woman to be joined in the legal bond of marriage. The points of contention are largely separated into 4 main categories. The sanctity of the institution known as 'Marriage', the benefits gained from being married, family structure, and the growing impact of our society on a religious institution.

The political aspects of whether same-sex couples should be allowed to federal and government recognized marriages are a very complex issue. There are basically two sides to the political argument of whether same-sex couples should be allowed to marry. On one side are the liberals who feel that marriage is a civil right that should be denied based on the basis of a person's sexual orientation. On the other side you have conservatives who feel that marriage is an institution in which should only constitute one man and one woman. In this report we are going to examine how the issue of same-sex marriages are affecting our current political environment, how politics is affecting the movement for

Same-Sex couples have had a long battle in obtaining the right to marry. Some battles fought ended in victory, others in defeat. In the end, same-sex couples would win a major victory that would end the fight forever. This paper will review some of the battles that led to the Supreme Court decision that gave same-Sex couples the same legal rights to marry as opposite-sex couples and

Sullivan develops his argument with a series of problem and solution type sections towards many of the common counterarguments against gay marriage. Sullivan’s purpose in his piece is to answer many counter arguments and debug the myths and stereotypes regarding homosexuals and homosexual marriage in order to give the reader several facts to base their opinion on and possibly even gain support for gay marriage rights. Sullivan employs a scholarly like tone, simply stating the holes in counterarguments and stating the reasons why by using facts and little bias, gaining the audience’s trust. The major argument in Gays and Lesbians Should Be Allowed to Marry is that there is no legitimate reason to withhold the right to a legal marriage from two deeply in love people, be it a man and a woman or a man and a man or a woman and a woman. To get his readers to believe him, Sullivan uses a wonderful use of logos by stating simple fact with little to no bias in most sections of this piece. By stating many counterarguments, like if gays should raise children, he catches the attention of the reader and clears up the myths they might have heard.

The recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of Same-Sex Marriage has caused great controversy in the United States. People from both sides of this argument are still feeling the backfire from this decision. It is not easy to justify same-sex marriage, an institution that some same-sex couples consider to be a political act (Kimport, 2013). Despite the contemporary understandings of marriage as a personal union based on love, this implicit collective identity can easily be misinterpreted as a dislike for such unions. In fact, it is the exact opposite.

President Bill Clinton validated the Defense of Marriage Act into law in 1996 to prevent the federal government from acknowledging same-sex marriages and decree that no state should acknowledge any other state marriage license if it belongs to a same-sex couple. The authors’ state, “On May 17, 2004, nonetheless, in Massachusetts became the inaugural state to proclaim same-sex marriage, as legitimate and enforceable” (Roberts and Starks). California, with the nation largest racially diverse gay and lesbian population has more recently played an eminent role within the contemporary gay marriage dissension (Roberts and Starks). In 2008, with rulings

The lawful issues encompassing same-sex marriage in the United States are muddled by the country 's government arrangement of government. Before 1996 and the death of the Protection of Marriage Act, the government lawfully perceived any marriage that was perceived by one of the States, regardless of the possibility that a few

Same sex marriage became legal on June 26th, 2015. So, why is there still discrimination? It’s legal, right? The discrimination against homosexual athletes in American sports is out of control and needs to be changed immediately. How would people feel being looked down upon being one of the only openly gay athletes in the United States? Before 2014 there was not any openly gay athletes currently playing professional sports in the United States. This shows the fear humans have when it comes to being honest about their sexuality because they know what the general public thinks about it. Discrimination is inhumane, especially when it comes to peoples beliefs. Sixty-five percent of females in the WNBA are homosexual, but are not discriminated against compared to the way male athletes are. Many gay athletes do not come out about their sexuality until after retirement because they fear what others will think.

The issue of whether to allow same-sex marriage in America is a controversial topic that is heavily debated upon. In my opinion, I feel that same-sex marriage should be allowed. This is due to several reasons. The right to marriage is an important civil right that should be allowed for same-sex couples, and this is so from a deontological standpoint as well. Marriage is able to bring about many positive benefits for same-sex couples and their families. Also, same-sex marriage has received support from many religious leaders. Furthermore, it does not have negative consequences on the institution of the American family, and could even have positive consequences. From a consequentialist point of view, it should be allowed too. In

Same sex marriage has been a huge topic for many years. Some states have ruled it unconstitutional, and some have disagreed, and even passed a law to allow same sex couple to legally get married. Should we punish people for wanting to show and express their love for one another? Me personally, I feel that these people should be allowed to show their love for one another the same as a man marring a woman. The only difference in their love is sexual preference and I don’t think that should be a huge deal.