Same War, Different Tatics Essay examples

Martin Luther King and Malcom X, both prominent figures in the Civil Rights movement, had vastly different views on segregation and violence. The first time these two met was at the U.S. Capitol in 1964 to watch the Senate debate on a Civil Rights bill. Of the two, Martin Luther king had the better philosophy for America in the 1960’s because of his views on Integration, economics, and anti-violence.

Dr. King and Malcolm X strived to achieve equality for blacks under the law, more specifically, voting rights, desegregation, and more representation in government and politics. However, both men differed immensely in their tactics and strategies. For Dr. King, the negotiations could be brought about by the persistence of a nonviolent plan where, the oppressed people’s determination would overcome the will of the oppressor in the hearts and minds of the nation. He firmly believed in the principles of Mahatma Gandhi’s method of nonviolence resistance, which had been successful in driving the British out of India. For example, according to King, one of the resisters, or black mans goals is not to humiliate the opponent, (the white man) but to win his friendship and understanding. Dr. King proposed a passive resistance, based on “the conviction that the universe is on the side of justice” (“Pilgrimage to Non Violence” King, 112). He claimed the center of nonviolence is based on the principle of love, or understanding. Dr. King emphasized that the white man should not be held responsible for the minorities and blacks being oppressed. Here is where the two leaders oppose each other. Malcolm X felt social injustice and racism had endured too long, and it was

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very significant during the Civil Rights Movement. Both were excellent speakers and shared one goal but had two different ways of resolving it. Martin Luther King Jr. chose to resolve the issues by using non-violence to create equality amongst all races to accomplish the goal. Malcolm X also wanted to decrease discrimination and get of segregation but by using another tactic to successfully accomplish the similar goal. The backgrounds of both men were one of the main driven forces behind the ways they executed their plans to rise above the various mistreatments. Martin Luther King Jr. was a more pronounced orator, a more refined leader, and overall saw the larger picture than Malcolm X.

Malcolm X approach to the civil rights issue was completely different from Martin Luther King, Jr. approach. Martin Luther King, Jr approach was to make a peaceful,

Now During segregation there was a lot of natural rights activist and people standing up for their rights and freedoms. What made Malcolm different than everyone else is that he believed that segregations and all the problems should be ,solved with violence. He said that African-American should try to fight back against white men. MLK believed that we needed to fight withpeace and kindness, but they were both believed and fought for the same thing. Malcolm also shared his religion unlike other activist. He spread Elijah Muhammad’s teachings and his beliefs and everything that he

The African Americans managed to solve their conflict and resolution through acts of non-violence and struggle. Even though the actions taken by Malcolm X were of good intentions, they ended up causing a ripple between African Americans. On the other hand Martin Luther King Jr. identified that if people were going to respond to hatred with more hatred then there will be little chances for change and substance which was never understood by Malcolm. He was, of course, powerful and strong as an Africa American commanding huge followers and believers, but things did not end well as Malcolm X dies in the hand of his own people. This meant that change cannot be made through dividing a nation but through uniting the people. Therefore Civil Rights Movements of the 1960s would have not had the same impact if they had been led by Malcolm X instead of Martin Luther King.

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both prominent figures during the civil rights movement. Some similarities are they were both ministers and they both stood for what they believed in. Malcolm X took a more violent approach to his activism, he believed in fighting back physically for what he believe in. Martin Luther King Jr. took a more peaceful approach to his activism, he was always against violence. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that all races should come together as one and be equal while Martin X was suspicious of white people and felt that integration would destroy the black and white man. So while Martin Luther King Jr. was a peaceful leader, Malcolm X was a more fight for what you believe in leader.

In a time of people who needed a needed a leader to guide them to the “promise land” as MLK Jr. called it. The promised land is not a place but a figure of speech referring to when freedom and justice are available to all colors of skin. Where all colors of skin can be equally educated, get the same rights, and even just the ability to sit in their local shoe store. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X both were fighting for this, but they pursued this in different ways. The similarities in their fights were they both used religion to control their protest, both were segregated as a child, and the fought for civil rights, but there may be more differences in these things than you may expect.

Malcolm X believed that blacks should be separate from whites as well as equal; he developed this view from the influence of the Nation of Islam and because of the long term abuse and suffering caused by several prominent whites in his life. The views of Malcolm X changed after he left the Nation of Islam in 19__ and he started to view Kings methods in a less negative light and began to be more tolerant towards White people, this new stance was developed during his visit to Mecca where he realised that many of the lessons he had learnt from the Nation of Islam where false and unfair and not all whites were 'white devils' Martin Luther King's aims were to make black people equal with whites in the same society. King appreciated that this would take time and so he set out to prove that the segregation system was not separate and equal, the successes of this struggle gave the civil rights movement press coverage which transmitted their beliefs to the world. King used the methods he learned from Ghandi, he used non-violence protests and tried not to break the law whilst stilling trying to prove the segregation system unfair. This form of non-violent direct action was widely criticised by both Black power organisations (for not being of any significance) and White Americans (for inciting violence) but in truth it highlighted how unjust the segregation system

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X helped shape American as a black and white culture as off today. Martin Luther king Jr. and Malcolm X seemingly preach two opposing futures for black politics. But the differences between both were not as significant as their dedication to the black cause functioned to unite them both. Martin called for a nonviolent confrontation as a mean of building an integrated community of blacks and whites in America, and in the other hand Malcom X insistence of black society to separate from white society. Malcom X was seen more to the black American people as the Black Klu Klux Klan of political race extremists.

The African American leaders Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. had a common goal of pursuing the equality and civil rights of African Americans, but had rather different ways of approaching this common goal. Both X and King have different views on the problems African Americans are facing, and have their own way of trying to resolve them. Even if they have a main common goal, they still have many personal goals to achieve and different means of accomplishing them. While they both are trying to achieve their goals, X and King have different obstacles and ways of overcoming them. Lastly, the biggest thing that makes the two leaders so different, is the relationship of whites to their political

Throughout history, there are stories about great leaders who fought for what they believed in. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are two great african american individuals who fought for equal rights but in different ways. Their beliefs come from how they grew up and where they come from. King for example is well educated and grew up in a middle class family. While, Malcolm X’s household was underprivileged and he barely had any schooling. Even though King and Malcolm X come from different backgrounds, they both fought for the same rights, but each had a different way of approaching it.

During the Civil Rights Movement in the late 1950s and 1960s, important African-American men fought for economical, political and social equality for their race. Even though they were fighting for the same thing, their ideas to attain equality were unusually different. Martin Luther King wanted to a integrate non violent society; on the other hand Malcolm X thought complete separation was the solution to inequality. Either way both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were some of the most influencing leaders of the Civil Rights period . Both men were able to bring change in the black community; their views

To remain a criminal is the disgrace” (GoodReads). We see an essence of this in his speech entitled “The Ballot or the Bullet”. Here he passionately talked about how important it is for African Americans to receive full equality on their home soil of the United Stated of America. If the government continued to deny this right to them that they might be forced to use armed force. King writes his letter while incarcerated appropriately titled "Letter from Birmingham Jail".

There are many differences between Malcolm X and Martin Luther, but the most striking is that MLK was a very good statesman who delivered moving speeches about peace, freedom and democracy while Malcolm X was a known eradicator of those who was not of the superior white race. Malcolm X refused to see the impossibility of losing, but believed in getting equal rights by any means necessary such as separatism; Martin Luther