Sameness In The Giver

In “The Giver”, written by Lois Lowry, one of the major theme’s is “sameness”, which effects very deeply the life of citizens in the community based on perfection.Sameness in somewhere just as this community, can either cause disadvantages or advantages at the same time, also including the loss of diversity.

Lois Lowry's The Giver describes Jonas, as we jump into his world of sameness. But Jonas isn't quite the same as everyone else. With what is called ''the power to see beyond'', Jonas is able to see slight visions of color that no one else can. To them, the world is in black and white, to prevent any jealousy relating to color. When Jonas is selected to be ''the reciever of memory'', he is immediately confused, as he should've gotten assigned to a job like ''teacher of the fives''. It turns out with Jonas' special abillity comes great responsibility. When he meets The Giver, he finds out his new job will be to take the memories of the entire world from The Giver, to provide wisdom to the community when they most need it. Only Jonas, The Giver, and a select group of the community known as ''The Elders'' know what the world was before sameness came about. Sameness might be tough to describe, but the best way it could be put is that it's a eutopia with a multitude of downsides. With this, I hope to describe what the pros and cons of having a world of sameness would be.

The things that make people human could be easily be taken away. In the book, The Giver, the government has made the citizens believe that sameness is good to have. The government would even go far enough to get rid of twins to completely avoid a little confusion. People are being forced to believe that sameness is a good thing and that being unique or different is a bad thing. These people are prevented from learning about the outside world. In The Pedestrian, people aren’t doing anything except for watching tv. The police catches a man, Leonard Mead, late at night walking and they suspect he’s doing a suspicious act. The police ask what he’s doing and he says that he’s just taking a walk like what he’s been doing for years.

The novel The Giver by Lois Lowry illustrates a dystopian society hi lighting the limitations of individuality and suppression of cultural memory in order to prevent any potential destruction that warrants deviation from the totalitarian state of mind with the society depends on. The dependence on the elaborately regulate system however causes the burden of beneficial and detrimental knowledge to the rest on one person's shoulders. Through sociological analysis I will analyze the effects of this reliance on the Giver’s ability to retain such crucial information on a singular causes the detrimental affect triggered not by the inability of the Giver but rather by the society’s unwillingness to change. It can be observed that dystopian societies are ambivalent in nature, situated in utopian text; however, in Lowry's novel the world is engineered where the utopia goes wrong due to its extinction of the aesthetic and personal choices. In “The Utopian the Function of memory in Lois Lowry’s the giver, the author analyzes the ambiguity between the dystopian aspect and the utopian aspect of the society created in the novel (Hanson).

In Lois Lowry’s The Giver, the Giver and Jonas use the two following quotes to justify their community’s idea of “Sameness”, where everyone is the same but has no choice. The Giver tells Jonas, “Life here is so orderly so predictable—so painless.” In response, Jonas says, “We really have to protect people from wrong choices.” Eventually, both Jonas and the Giver realize that sameness is wrong and that it is better to be equal, to have the same rights, but able to choose to be different.

Equality seems to be very good to have and it seems like everyone should have it, but is it really that good? Surely everyone should have it, but how much equality should be? “The Giver” and “Harrison Bergeron” both show examples of utopia and equality but both don’t work out. Our world wouldn’t be a better place if everyone are lifted up onto the same level, because although equality is very important and good, complete equality will be a bad thing, and complete equality is something that would never happen in our world. Equality is quite important for the majority of us, it is also good for society and the world.

Imagine living in a world where nothing changed and everyone was the same. In Lois Lowry’s novel, The Giver, the society is all the same. For example the people of the society do not fight and there is no war. Sameness is slowly working its way into our society. It is used as uniforms in some schools, even secluding yourself to a specific friend group because everyone has the same interests could be considered as Sameness. I believe Sameness is a major advantage due to no one suffering, but living where a society is completely the same would not be an interesting life to live. The Giver portrays how sameness in a society could have advantages and disadvantages.

You are about to experience a brief compare and contrast paper between reality and a fantasy. In which our world is no long a mass chaos but everyone is equal to each other. I am going to compare the book to the movie. Many things are different and most are the same, but i'm going to point of the differences today between the movie and the book.

The Giver was created by Lois lowry, Lois is a 78 year old author and was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, and she was inspired to write at age 8. She currently lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and she's married with four kids. The Giver is definitely an interesting book. It’s different, there's an 11-year-old boy named Jonas, he lives in a community with his parents and sister. They don't have a president or a queen, they have a chief elder.

When the Giver explains the idea of Sameness to Jonas, he starts to think how it would be dangerous without it. He wonders how people would make the right decisions without any help from people with honor and intelligence. In my opinion, some things would be easier and safer for society if they chose things for us. One thing that would make the world safer would be if society could choose who can bear arms and who could not. If dangerous people were not able to carry or own guns, knives, etc., the world would be a much safer place.

Words can have a powerful affect on people’s mind and wellbeing and can exceedingly alter their perception of things. In The Giver words are given different meanings to alter the communities perception of the world they live in. Often when someone says they are a nurturer it means they care for a protect others, this is not so in the book. The act of nurturing, the way a mother might nurture her child is different from the nurturers in the book, they are chosen to simply watch the newborns, also called newchildren and make sure they are alive until they are assigned to live with a family. No bonding is happening between them, the newborns are not even given names until they are ready to be given to a

Is sameness good? In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry sameness is throughout the whole community. The report below will include reasons sameness is a good and bad thing. Sameness is bad because of the way it affects people throughout the community.

The survival of civilization and society has primarily revolved around one key aspect, conformity. Conformity among a society’s people ensures that certain rules are being followed, and are intended to establish order and equality among the general public. However, too much conformity is not beneficial to the individual nor does it help the group in the long run. In Lois Lowry’s dystopian novel “The Giver,” people live in a seemingly utopian society where everyone has converted to “sameness” in order to preserve a true sense of equality and structure. The society, with the use of pills provided by their political powers, are incapable of seeing color, have no memories, and are contained within their own environment.

Lois Lowry’s novel, The Giver, offers a thought provoking, well written story, because it changes the perspective of anyone who dares to read it to. Lowry places her novel, at some point in the future when mankind has gone away with changes and choices in life. She forces readers appreciate, or at least re-think the world they live in today. Her novel presents a fully human created environment where people have successfully blocked out conflict, grief, and individuality. Each person follows the same routine every day. Failure comply with standards, to be different, means death. Jonas, the main character, finds himself trapped in this world.

Would you sacrifice the freedom and individuality of yourself, your kids, their kids and generations more, for safety? In a community with no real emotion, no stress or worry, this is a way of life called Sameness. Sameness is where everyone has their choices made for them. Where everyone is treated alike, making them all equal. Twelve year old Jonas, the main character to The Giver by Lois Lowry agrees with this at first, but after experiencing memories no one else can, he has a hard time figuring out what and who to believe.