Sample Essay

1. The nation is at war, and your number in the recently reinstated military draft has just come up. The problem is that, after serious reflection, you have concluded that the war is unjust. What advice might Socrates give you? Would you agree? What might you decide to do? Read the Introduction, Chapter 2 Crito and the Conclusion Chapter 40 Phaedo by Plato.

After further questioning you learn she is strictly following the fl uid and salt restriction ordered during

1. Question: Why does Gatto think that school is boring and childish? How does Gatto’s depiction of school compare with your own elementary and secondary school experience?

Matt Lamkin’s “A Ban On Brain-Boosting Drugs is Not the Answer” first appeared in Chronicle of Higher Education in 2011. In this essay Lamkin aims to convince his reader not to deter improper conduct with threats, but to encourage students to engage in the practice of education. Lamkin tells us “If colleges believe that enhancing cognition with drugs deprives students of the true value of education, they must encourage students to adapt that value as their own” (642). Appeal to logic, consistency, and compare/contrast are techniques Lamkin skillfully uses to create a strong effective essay.

Read the article Diagnosis Coding and Medical Necessity: Rules and Reimbursement by Janis Cogley located on the AHIMA Body of Knowledge (BOK) at http://www.ahima.org.

My interest for the Attorney Advisor position with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) arises from my longstanding commitment to constantly improve myself. I have always enjoyed legal research, writing, and the complexities of intellectual property. I have no doubt that my enthusiasm to research, my eagerness to learn, and my strong ability to communicate clearly, work efficiently, accurately, and quickly, will make me an invaluable asset to the USPTO. I believe these traits combined with my unique skillset, developed as a result of experiences working for the Arizona Diamondbacks of Major League Baseball (Diamondbacks), Nike Inc. (Nike), and the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Liability Management Department (AG Office)

Our nation is strongest when we embrace the diversity of ideas and contributions from our young people. Today’s decision to end the deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA) policy effectively disrupts the futures of the nearly 800,000 young people who have called the United States home since childhood — and represents an incredible loss for America, undermining the very foundation on which this country of immigrants was built.

Perhaps the day of the termination of the DACA program (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) was a silent day for most of the people who have benefited from Obama’s policy to avoid deportation and be able to work and study inside the US. The silence is attributed to the fear and uncertainty, that old feeling that DREAMers experienced in a pre-DACA era—a time spent mostly under the shadows; a time that seems to prevail once again.

The focus of my research paper will be on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) that former president Barack Obama passed in 2012. My paper will give an overview of the history of the executive order, and will discuss which groups of people this policy might marginalize. In addition, my paper will explore the benefits and disadvantages of the DACA program. Lastly, my paper will address where the DACA program stands within our current political situation.

In order to fix our increasingly inefficient and divisive immigration system, we need a president who has this issue as a top priority. Hillary Clinton, a current United States presidential candidate, has immigration as one of her defining issues accompanied by a feasible and realistic policy. Former Secretary of State Clinton announced that if elected president, she will establish an Office of Immigrant Affairs, creating a place in the White House dedicated to integration services for immigrants and refugees. To facilitate the process for the 11 million illegal immigrants in our country to apply for citizenship, Clinton fully supports current president Obama’s executive orders on DACA and DAPA. DACA and DAPA give deferred action status to

The United States of America is known as a nation of immigrants and was built upon people of a variety of nationalities. For centuries, we have welcomed generations of immigrants into America such as British-Americans, Chinese-Americans, Mexican-Americans, etc. Currently, in our modern times, immigration has been a very divisive issue. In 2012, the Obama Administration created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, to give young undocumented immigrants, or Dreamers, a temporary endowment of protection from deportation and a permit to work legally in the US. This has given over 800,000 people relief and has provided hope. While some might argue that the implementation of DACA went against the constitutional principles of separation of powers and the president's duty to execute the laws faithfully, Trump’s decision to repeal DACA violates the 14th amendment of the Constitution as well as the concepts of citizenship where the Constitution defines that everyone is protected whoever lives in the United States.

In regard to the defunding of DACA, I am truly against the act that the Trump administration is trying to enforce on ending all of these children’s futures and throwing them out of this beloved country for no logical reasoning besides politics. Everything written by the Education Board in the article titled “Donald Trump’s Cowardice on Dreamers,” I completely agree with. I believe what the Trump administration is doing is an enormous leap backwards for this country and its “progress” in the past couple decades regarding immigration. Again, my parents immigrated to this land 16 years ago and brought me along, I feel a personal connection to this awful political decision in the making. Due to how I know the struggles my dad went through to bring his family here and give us all a better life than we would’ve had living back home, I feel an obligation to speak up and against this decision in the making.

“Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” referred as DACA, is a program established by President Barak Obama administration on June 2012. This program allowed youngsters conveyed to this nation wrongfully by their folks to get an impermanent relief from expelling, to get authorization to work, examine and acquire a driver's licenses. The Justice Department has announced that it would end the DACA program but nonetheless, President Donald Trump has passes this to Congress to act on it in a six-month period to be able to save the policy. President Donald Trump argues that immigrants are lawbreakers who damage citizens of the United States by taking away their jobs and slowing down their wages. Congress is attempting to react to Trump's request

On September 9, 2017, a nationwide DACA march occurred. Thousands of people gathered and marched in protest against the Trump administration’s decision and in union with the ‘Dreamers’. On March 5, 2018 ‘Dreamers’ and supporters once again took to the streets to march and demand for Congress to find a legislative fix for Dreamers. March 5th wasn’t just the deadline for Congress to fix the DACA repeal, but it was also the last hope for all ‘Dreamers’. When no solution or decision was made on the matter thousands of furious Americans and ‘Dreamers’ made sure their voices were heard. They protested and fought to make sure everyone knew they weren’t going to let them do

Q.1: What are the advantages and disadvantages to Kraft Foods (Cadbury) of producing new lower-calorie versions of their existing chocolate bars?