Sample Informative Outline On International Adoption

New York was the home of the first adoption agencies from 1910 to 1930. They were created by Clara Spence, Alice Chaplin, and Florence Walrath. All three women shared the same ideas, they felt as though children born “out of wedlock” should be given up for adoption to a husband and wife, completing the family (“Adoption History: First Specialized”).

In today's society, the idea of adoption is an open and welcome one. “When an adoptive family begins to explore the idea of adopting a child, it is easy for them to quickly become overwhelmed with information, questions and decisions” (American Adoptions, Inc). However, one of the biggest problem most adoptive parents could run into is whether they are wanting to adopt domestically or internationally. With the number of celebrities’ advertising the ease of adopting internationally and the publicizing conditions the orphans live in it makes American families want to adopt internationally. The number of children in the United States in foster care approved for adoption and the number of newborns born unwanted does not make the news so it domestic adoption is not as glamorous. Domestic adoption should be the first choice to help improve our country and give the children born in the United States a chance at a family.

The participants were 15 white, mothers, who had adopted either internationally or domestically. International adoptions were from China, Korea, and South America. Domestically adopted children

Currently, there is only limited statistical information on U.S. adoptions. (Child Welfare Information Par. 2) The most complete statistics were gathered by the National Center for Social Statistics (NCSS) from 1957 through 1975. Most new statistical information about adoption is being gathered and analyzed by private organizations, through private surveys and research. (http://statistics.adoption.com/information/adoption-statistics-overview.html)

Since ancient times and in all human cultures, children have been transferred from adults who would not or could not be parents to adults who wanted children for love, labor, and property. Adoption’s close association with humanitarianism, upward mobility and infertility are uniquely modern phenomena. Adoption was not fully marked on who was adopted and by whom until 1920. (darkwing.uorgeon.edu) In fact, closed adoptions amended birth certificates and legal regulations are a recent innovation that gained momentum in the 1930s and later, and many adoptions were open prior to that. (Free, Barbara). Historians consider the 1851 Adoption of Children Act an important turning point because it directed judges to make sure that adoption decrees were

Throughout the history of America, children have been put in orphanages and put up for adoption. As the ProQuest staff has explained in the timeline, "The will of Governor Sir William Phips of Massachusetts makes reference to his adopted son. This is the first recorded legal adoption in the American colonies" (Staff, ProQuest). At the time this was considered to be a unique case. After this event there were very few, if any cases of a legal adoption in America for years to come. As time progressed, the concern for orphaned and abandoned children grew, and orphanages were constructed and opened. David Gates states in his article History of the Orphanage "Ursuline nuns founded the first orphan asylum in North America in 1729, after Indians massacred

Radical changes in adoption policies have occurred over the past half century. As the numbers of adoptions

The image of an American family has changed dramatically over the last fifty years. American families are no longer modeled after the Cleavers. International adoption has contributed to this changing family view, bringing in children who are not biologically related to their parents and often of a different race. This new American image has helped eliminate race related issues. So, what is the controversy with international adoption? Children are the future of a country; children are human resources. If a country is losing their children to international adoption; the county is losing the gifts and talents that are irreplaceable in those children. Intercountry adoption should not be a viable adoption source because this process does not adequately benefit those involved, international adoption exploits poor children and hurts their countries of origin.

The United States has adopted indefinitely more children internationally than any other country. In 2008, there were 17,456 children adopted internationally by American parents (Statistics 1). Supposing that domestic adoption was prioritized over international adoption, those 17,456 children would have been adopted domestically. If these parents would have chose to adopt domestically, the United States foster system population would drastically drop over 17,000 because those children would have a loving home.

After World War II, the dissolution of European families resulted in the significant increase in the number of adoptions of foreign born children. This began America’s active participation in what is currently known as international, or intercountry, adoption. Every year for the last six decades, Americans have adopted thousands of foreign born children. It is the process by which the prospective adoptive parent adopts a child from a country other than the parent’s own, through permanent legal means, and brings that child to the parent’s country of residence to live with the parent permanently. Like domestic adoption, it is the legal transfer of parental rights and responsibilities from a child’s birth parents, or guardian, to a new parent.

There are essentially two ways to adopt a child; one technique, known as an open adoption and one known as closed. Throughout the first quarter of the century,

In all of the international adoption cases, an important value is diversity. Adoptive families should show an interest in adopting from the country that they are adopting from. The families should find the culture of their future child to be very important. As the adoption counselor and I went one particular home study, I noticed stacks of books with information about Korea and even flash cards, so that they can learn Korean. In a research study completed by Reynolds, Pontereotto, and Lecker, it was discovered that “…participants expressed a struggle in dealing with the expectations and opinions of outsiders related to their racial and ethnic identities” (2016). Even though the couple’s books are there to support them and help them engage with

In the beginning, International adoption programs in poor nations like that of Ethiopia, started with a few honest humanitarian adoptions, rescuing orphans from hopeless circumstances. However, once the news of an overflow of healthy adopted children out a specific country reach Western countries, expectant parents that desire healthy children begin to sign up for more children than the small, poor country can adequately supply. As a result of these demands,

The necessity of adoption in the world is astounding. Currently, there is an estimated 143 million orphans worldwide (Wingert, vol.151). As of 2007, there were 513,000 children living in foster care within the United States alone (Rousseau 21:14). International adoption in the United States was jumpstarted post World War II as a way of helping those children who were left homeless, after war had taken their parents. Although there are thousands of healthy children awaiting adoption in the United States, several American couples still turn to foreign adoption when seeking potential children. Americans often fail to realize the need for intervention within their own country and their duty to take care of domestic affairs before venturing to

Since 1776, the United States of America has had a growing problem with orphans and childhood adoption. Orphanages become overpopulated while foster homes shelter up to 3 children on average. The foster care system has been viewed as positive reinforcement for American homes; yet the point of fostering children is consistently overlooked. Adoption is necessary for orphans, foster children, or children in abusive homes. The act of adopting a child comes with positive benefits and fiscal responsibility, such as government assistance and wiser spending. Children obtain a healthy childhood with a familiar sense of belonging. The drawback of this is the long governmental process of petitioning for adoption. Seeking the birthparents, if they are alive, retrieving consent, being fiscally responsible, and having a safe environment for the child to grow up in are all responsibilities to look forward to when adopting a child. The adoption rate in the United States of America needs to increase dramatically, as there are social benefits, mental health improvements, and economical advantages for families who adopt.