Sample Rhetorical Speeches

Florence Kelley, an active social worker and reformer of the 20th century, rants over the horrendous working conditions kids must endure. She presents this in her speech before National American Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia, which provides context and credibility for her argument. Kelley argues clearly of the terrible conditions and work hours kids suffer to bring about her message of, “enlisting the workingmen voters.” This is essentially to free the kids from the disastrous issue through her usage of credibility, empathetic tone to strike the audience, and her usage of examples of their conditions and state rules to support her message and purpose.

In the middle of the speech, Florence Kelley states the situation regarding the legality of child labor in many states, using firm facts, doleful repetition, and ironic diction to arouse within the audience a sympathetic response to want the children removed from their harmful situations along with the logical response of wanting to repeal the laws associated with allowing children in damaging manufacturing industries. Kelley employs several examples of different laws in different states allowing children to work long hours at young ages. One example given describes even the lack of restrictions on child labor whatsoever. “In Georgia there is no restriction whatever! A girl of six or seven years…may work eleven hours by day or by night.” Utilizing

Florence Kelley delivered a speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association. The reason Florence Kelley delivered this speech was to convince the women of the asscocitation to abolish child labor.

In 1861, Alfred M. Green delivered his famous speech in efforts to encourage African Americans to prepare to be able to fight for their Country. Green uses couterarguemnts to show the african Americans that he understands where they might have doubts about fighting for the Union. He also uses a variety of other rhetorical strategies such as historical reference and repetition to convince African Americans that they should help the Union fight against the Confederacy.

Florence Kelley’s speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association in 1905, effectively utilized rhetorical strategies to convey her message about child labor. Through the use of vivid imagery, repetition of “while we sleep” and juxtaposition, Kelley successfully persuaded her audience to support the reform of child labor laws. Vivid imagery is portrayed throughout the speech to describe the overworked children all over the United States. This evokes strong emotions throughout her audience as she emphasizes how while asleep, young children will be working in textiles the whole night in the “deafening noise of the spindles” as well as “looms spinning”. By describing how young children, including “little girls” across the United States,

Child Labor and women's suffrage was few of the things Florence Kelly really focused throughout most of her life. In the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association on July 22,1905 , Kelley delivered a speech to the audience. In her speech she uses logic , repetition, and emotional appeal, to help her to point out the issue of child labor.

As Toni Morrison has made clear, language can be used to oppress and subjugate other people. However, it can also be used for more honorable purposes. The four different public speeches in the United States — Patrick Henry’s “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death,” Abraham Lincoln’s “The Gettysburg Address,” John F. Kennedy’s “Inaugural Address,” and Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream.” — were used to uplift and ennoble an audience. The authors of these four speeches utilized strong rhetorical devices like logos, ethos, and pathos in order to successfully convey their message to their audience. These speeches were given in order to protect the freedom, liberty, and equality of all people.

Alfred M. Green’s speech about the African American citizens joining the military was very well spoken. Throughout the speech he uses logos, ethos, and pathos appeal to his audience, loaded words and tone to emphasize his points, and imagery and literary devices to manipulate his audience in a sense to take action as any arguer would want.

In Florence Kelley’s speech before the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on July 22, 1905, she argues that there are millions of young children working under harsh conditions that is not acceptable in human nature. Kelley promotes an end to child labor by utilizing pathos and repetition in her speech to strengthen her claim. By stating out facts, she compares the conditions of young boys and girls with healthy men in order to emphasize about child abuse and to encourage her audience to stand with her to fight for child labor laws.

Authors who are not from the scientific community appear to be more assertive about their claims as compared to experts of the field. In the following rhetorical analysis, I explore the differences in original research articles tailored toward experts and pop science articles which target a general audience. The pop science article is, “Immune System, Unleashed by Cancer Therapies, Can Attack Organs”, written by Matt Richtel of the New York Times. I compare this with the original research article, “Checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy targets tumour-specific mutant antigens” by Gubin et al., published in Nature journal. Both articles talk about the cutting-edge research in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Cancer immunotherapy gets rid of tumors by using the body’s immune system to target cancer cells. Gubin et al.’s article uses genomics and bioinformatics to compare therapeutic synthetic long-peptide vaccines with the working of immunotherapy drugs. Richtel’s article discusses the

Logos, pathos, and ethos have been existing to empower and strengthen our writing. In this rhetorical analysis essay, logos, pathos, and ethos that are used in the Annual Address will be clearly identified and evaluated. The Annual Address written by Joseph Jackson discusses the issues of discrimination and racism. It was written and delivered at the 84th Annual Session of the National Baptist Movement. Unlike many others back in history, Jackson believes that actions should be taken place before any demanded result. Jackson appeals to his fellow race to take action and adds credibility to his claims by using historical examples from the past. Also, Jackson makes personal connections with his targeted audience, black people, which builds trust between the speaker and the reader. We will be examining the context of the this speech and Jackson’s perspective and claims.

The discussion of a possible link between autism spectrum disorder and vaccinations stirs up people’s emotions. For this reason, it is crucial to determine the correct rhetorical context. Rhetorical context plays a vast role in the portrayal and the writing of a piece. A major part of rhetorical context in a research paper is the audience. For my research paper, I determined that my audience will be young, educated couples who are expecting their first child and are about to do research on the issue.

The rhetorical analysis was one of the first assignments in which we were allowed to have a peer review session, which was much required since this was the first major assignment in which we were tasked to write at a more elevated style and language.

Barack Obama, Martin Luther King Jr. and Fannie Lou Hamer all delivered powerful, persuasive speeches that will go down in history. The use of these creative individuals’ language and persuasion played a pivotal role within the civil rights movement. We can observe this in the speakers’ rhetoric devices like ethos, logos and pathos.

It has become more and more common these days to tune into the news and hear a journalist or a politician saying something along the lines of "It's just empty rhetoric" in response to a statement by someone of an opposing viewpoint. However, upon further examination, this statement does not necessarily make any sense. According the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, rhetoric is defined as "the art of speaking or writing effectively" ("Rhetoric") How could someone's ability be "empty" if rhetoric is being able to write or speak efficiently? It does not make sense. While Merriam-Webster's definition provides a broad understanding, it lacks the depth that encompasses the entirety of rhetoric as a whole. It goes beyond being able