Sam's Argument Analysis

Statsky also uses the all too common phenomenon of the overzealous parent or coach to support her thesis. She cites examples of parental brawls and coaches who rely on intimidation rather than good coaching to push their teams to victory (Statsky 629-30). Statsky seems to be saying that parents and coaches can behave in an obnoxious and even violent manner when they are part of organized sports for children, and that this behavior is yet another indication that organized sports are not suitable for children (629-30). This is a post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy. Though undoubtedly distressing for the children involved in these games, adult misbehavior is not an indication

A strong written argument is supported by several methods that are used to legitimize the author’s position as well as to discredit any counterargument brought forth. The techniques include introducing a counterargument and weakening it’s position with evidence. Providing legitimate academic research such as statistics as well as anecdotes from scholars on the given subject can reinforce the author’s argument. Another important method used is requiring the reader to critically think about a subject brought forth by challenging their preconceived ideas about a topic. This may also include using hidden assumptions that use implicit statements which have a certain opinion such as “If I follow the rules, good things will happen”, this is common

Since the dawn of mankind, clusters of innovations throughout history have allowed for societal progression at an explosive rate. While primarily fostering a centrifugal system of advancements; humans’ interests in expansion is spiraling out of control. Throughout history elements of collapse can be traced through civilizations and natural resources. Wright’s argument posits humans have hyperextended their utilization of resources at a rate that cannot be replenished, therein by setting up the world for the largest ecological collapse in history (Wright, 2004, pg. 130-131). Due to the cyclical process of past collapse and reformation humans have an advantage to rectify our current consumption rates ultimately avoiding a fate similar to past societies (Wright, 2004, pg. 131). As such Wright’s argument should frame larger discussions of responsible citizenship.

Both letter to the editor and editorial staff offer position that are supported by both facts and opinions. The letter explores to urges the new reusable bag ordinance while the editorial staff argues that they are serious about making Proposition 328 mandatory in every store. While both side make an acceptable case, it is clear that the letter provides a better argument.

Omari Akil provide an argument that Pokémon Go is an endangerment to black men because of the “statistically disproportionate chance” that someone could call the police to investigate the on the suspicious looking black men walking around in circles could lead to fatal shooting of another black male. Akil’s argument is important because he is discussing a social problem that most people will not realize until someone is laying in a pool of blood. Due to the severe social injustices and prejudices that African Americans are facing it is not safe playing Pokémon Go, with the war going on about police brutally between blacks and policemen, and the way the game is worked it is a target for black males.

In light of Jessica Statsky’s book ‘Children need to play, not compete’, she argued that, with the vivid increase of sporting competition lately in the United States, children have been exposed to the adults hard and rigorous training by devoted parents and coaches at their tender age making a game that is supposed to be fun and joy look hectic and strenuous to them due to the standard of training they are made to go through and also the belief that they must always win thereby making them lose the spirit of sportsmanship, and neither gaining satisfaction nor benefiting from them. In as much as sports are good for physical, mental and emotional growth, it should be organized in a manner that the youths will enjoy the game at the end of it rather than the fear of being hurt or defeated by the other competitors.

I believe that cocaine can make loads of money and can create a central narcotic-ran country. With pursuing the idea of selling narcotics, my country can rise up and develop into a more stable country. I have made Colombia a feared country, and that means power.

Sam Dillon appeals to fear by giving examples of what one might find in one of the letters being send and how unreadable they may be. For example, at the very beginning of the passage, page 415, Sam Dillon adds a quote from and E-mail that was transferred showing that even the people asking for help are lack in some English skills.

Russel, debating J. B. S. Haldane, a biochemist, argued that as science progressed, moral progress must also occur. Using tools capable of extreme consequences without the morality required is disaster waiting to happen. The tools provided by science, used for moral and proper purpose can be the greatest boon to society, Russel argues. Nevertheless, used without moral intentions, untold damage can be done. To allow a group to hold powers such as cures for disease, without checks in place to ensure morality within that group, gives the ability to hold hostage the rest of the populace. This kind of power, given the nature of human greed and selfishness must be avoided, Russel argues.

In some other books of the Bible it states who the author is in the beginning of the book, but in Hebrews the author is not stated. One argument says that Paul is the author and other argument says otherwise. The 4 arguments that Paul could be the authorship of Hebrews is, “Paul’s rabbinical training under Gamliel, knowledge of Judaism, Paul’s close relationship to Timothy, Peters reference to the writing of Paul,” (Peretti et al.2004, 34).

I really liked the organization of Cole’s argument sketch. It is almost identical to what I normally use when preparing for an essay, so I have decided to do something like his. It helped me rethink my entire argument and the subpoints I include. Although I changed the body paragraph topics of my essay, I can still use some of the subpoints I originally had. The Roman numerals of my outline are the pieces of evidence supporting each body paragraph. I highlighted the main topic of them to make it easier for myself and the readers to follow and understand. Below that are numbers which is where I try put things into perspective for the reader and show how these topics are actually relevant to their lives (see below for further explanation:).

In Dolly’s argument, she suggests three things; the skeptic’s argument (there is no way of knowing whether what you do has good or bad effects on the “real” world) is liberating, under the condition of accepting the skeptic’s argument, it does not matter what she does, and finally, because of the skeptic’s argument, she could just give into any whim without feeling guilty. In my opinion, Dolly’s argument has one premise and three conclusions. Dolly’s premise is that we have no way of knowing whether what we do has good or bad effects in the real world. Her conclusions, which are conditional of the premise being true, are; the skeptic’s argument is liberating, it does not matter what she does, and she can give into any whim without feeling

Philo argues the argument from design that shows that god is infinity, perfection, and unification. He made a claim that shows his unsupported to this argument, which has the idea of the universe design. This claim plays a significant role to the general thrust of the discussion in the Dialogues. Philo disagree with the argument and says that there is no nature evidence of god’s infinity, perfection, and unification.

“A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift is a satiric piece that, essentially, provides a solution to prevent that the children of the poor become a burden on the parents or the Country of Ireland. If his proposal is put to action, at exactly the age of one, children instead of being a drag will contribute and benefit the public good. Their contributions include, but are not limited to, feeding and clothing thousands of people and, furthermore, preventing abortions and shame (Swift 5). His easy and cheap solution is to fatten up 100,000 poor children and sell them as a culinary delicacy to those who are wealthy and economically established.

Parents who aggressively push their children in sport are a growing concern amongst parents and coaches. Bill is a coach and is worried about how far some parents go during games, what effects this has on the player. By looking into pushy parents and the effects, and evaluating the reports that are currently available, a report will be presented which will hopefully help.