Samuel Kramer 's Argument That The Ancient Civilization Of Sumer And The Modern Day World Essay

Mesopotamian and Ancient Egyptian are two very comparable cultures. There are similar and differences in regards to their Government, Law, Writing, Cities, Religion, Jobs, and Technology. This is reflected in their literatures, Epic Gilgamesh, and the Story of Sinuhe. Gilgamesh in the Epic of Gilgamesh and Sinuhe in the Story of Sinuhe are important characters that outline the perspective of an ancient society’s.

As a result of fulfilling desires, civilized Sumerians were required to use the resources around them at their disposal. A “tablet-box of cedar” and a “clasp of bronze,” would have required cedar trees to be cut down and bronze to be made from mined iron and copper. Unfortunately, due to overconsumption and necessity of these items, an irreversible amount of environmental degradation occurred, providing evidence that yet again, civilized Sumerian culture represented through the “tall, magnificent, and terrible,” King Gilgamesh is the worst version of humanity.

All the way from the start of civilization through to the Early Christianity there has been a pantheon of; destruction, recognition, wars, cultural diffusion, religious breakthroughs, laws that have been established, kings and queens crowned and dethroned. The Mesopotamian Civilization it was the land between two rivers the Tigris and the Euphrates Rivers that civilization first began.

The river valley civilizations of Sumer, Egypt, India, and China were historical pillars of innovation. Not only were they each responsible for having forged new technological innovations, but they each created their own system of writing as well. Each of them meets the requirements of being labeled as a “civilization” because each had a form of social organization, trade and economic activity, government, division of labor, and some form of record keeping. What sets them apart from one another are the specifics within the similarities they shared. These similarities and differences within their technological innovations and writing are numerous.

Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia present a valuable area of historical research. They are of great importance mostly because of their ethnic kinship (Watson, 2017). In such case, comparison and contrast essay is very promising as causal relationships can be formed based on a mutual starting point. This comparison-contrast essay focuses on differences and similarities in these societies’ economic, political and cultural life in order to make further implications regarding the circumstances the peoples of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia faced.

There were several differences and similarities within the Persian Empire that emerged under Cyrus the great and earlier Mesopotamian Empires. Not all empires flourished as well as Cyrus the great’s did due to his moral virtues and way of ruling. One king by the name of Tiglath had some similar values but his empire did not prosper in such ways as Cyrus’s. Not only were there differences and similarities between these different Empires but there were also different ways that Cyrus and his successors coopt earlier religious, political, and social traditions and i'll give several examples of them within this essay.

Long, long ago, before the invention of TV, the radio, and phones, people lived in ways that are very questionable and thought provoking to us today. Their traditions, customs , and culture are very different than ours. Many questions have arisen, and many have been answered. But, as always, the are those few questions that were never given an answer. Today we will be looking at many questions, yet there is one question that we will be thinking about throughout this entire essay. How did geographic challenges lead to the rise of city-states in Mesopotamia? This question and much more will be answered within this text, And who knows? Maybe you'll find a question of your own to answer!

The Immortality of Mesopotamian Ethics: A Primary Text Analysis of the Epic of Gilgamesh and Hammurabi Code “Studying the world's oldest writing for the first time compels you to wonder about what writing is and how it came about more than five thousand years ago and what the world might have looked like without it.” (Irving Finkel) The earliest form of language resides in Mesopotamia, the land “between two rivers,” a culture that was settled by the Sumerians, whom were the earliest inhabitants of the land. As one of the earliest documented civilizations, they have been credited for the discovery of the first created writing system. The creation of inscription made it possible for the Sumerians to document, not only the history, but also the

The evolvement of two noteworthy key societies in the Middle East and North Africa inspires my effort at comparative analysis. Because different geography, various degrees of exposure to outside invasion and influence, and different prior beliefs, Egypt, and Mesopotamia were similar to one another in many ways. Egypt emphasized strong central authority, while Mesopotamian politics shifted more frequently over a substructure of regional city-states. Mesopotamian art focused on less impressive structures while embracing a pronounced literary element that Egyptian art lacked. Egyptian civilization, formed by 3000 B.C., advanced from trade and technological influence from Mesopotamia, but it produced an entirely different social order and culture. Since its ethics and its tightly knit political association encouraged monumental building, we know more about Egypt about Mesopotamia, even though the latter was in the most respects more important and richer in subsequent heritage.

As you will journey through a time which two of the greatest civilizations that thrived in both similar and different ways. Although the ancient civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia had many similar and handful of differences characteristics due to their individual geographies, both have there own cteristics towards their way of religion and economy, The civilization of Mesopotamia created by people called Sumerians have chosen the land “Between Rivers” Tigris and Euphrates (pg.9) to flourish a civilization. In the blazing hot desert of Egypt you would not think civilization would flourish like the “Fertile Crescent” (pg.10) of Mesopotamia, but the “Gift of the Nile”(pg.14) begins in the heart of Africa and crossing northward flourishing civilization by its sides. Both Mesopotamia and Egypt have agricultural And trades oversea or land. One thing that these two civilizations had in common was the leaders calling themselves being a divine being and that they were the chosen one, as for the Egyptian pharaoh was the almighty “Son of Re” and Mesopotamian kings where the “Son of Anu” god of the sky. Both civilizations were polytheistic, belief in many gods.

Egypt and Sumer are both ancient civilizations that have flourished in the beginning of time, they have similarities but also many differences. Egypt, settled right on the Nile River, began as two separate regions: Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt. Oddly enough, Upper Egypt is, in fact, below Lower Egypt; but when a king named Narmer took over, he united them together into a single kingdom, which lasted over a period of 3,000 years. On the other hand, the ancient civilization Sumer was settled on two rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. Sumer, a little like the way Egypt was, is made up of city-states; these cities developed governments of their own, each with its own rulers.

In this account of a great flood, Utnapishtim, a Sumerian man, constructs a massive vessel to save his household from the disastrous flood sent by the gods. In addition to stories written about these climatic catastrophes, there are also firsthand accounts of these events, such as Hekanakhte’s Household, a series of letters from Hekanakhte, an Egyptian priest, to his family. In this account of the famines in Egypt, Hekanakhte sets rations for his family so that they will not starve during this period of scarcity. In both of these societies, Egypt and Sumer, there are stories and accounts of cataclysmic events in which civilizations and individuals responded and adapted to environmental change similarly and differently, with Egypt’s Hekanakhte rationing food to protect his household during a famine and Sumer’s Utnapishtim building a vessel to protect his household from an impending

Throughout history, societies have been divided. Divisions have been created through war, by money, and because of power struggles. Ancient Sumer was no different. There were three main classes in Ancient Sumer that contributed to this division in society.

Both civilizations have their own independent in-depth impact that they have instilled into the world. These two civilizations shall be unfolded, and examined, to find an outstanding compare and contrast of the things that where common around the

However, the staggering sagacity and the manifestation of Ma’at in such an overwhelming way in the life of a peasant seems to inaccurately represent the plight of a Middle Kingdom peasant. Additionally, just as is true in “The Story of Sinuhe,” “The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant” greatly slants the moral righteousness of the king for purpose of glorification, a typical Egyptian motif. “The Story of Sinuhe,” however, offers many more reliable representations of principles of social life in the Middle Kingdom. Through the documentation of Sinuhe’s life and travels throughout the lands surrounding Egypt two fundamental ideas of Egyptian life come to light, the concept that the king represents all importance in Egypt and the notion that being Egyptian is truly the pinnacle of existence. This tale also personifies the trait of a hatred of foreigners in Sinuhe as he constantly claims to have “killed the people in it by my strong arm, my bow, my maneuvers, and my advice” (59). While both of these stories offer information at face value about Middle Kingdom social life, an analysis of the rhetorical slants, inaccuracies, and propaganda used by these Egyptian authors provides valuable enlightenment as well.