Samurai And Knights Dbq Essay

In my first reason, I believe that a knight would win against a samurai because a knight focused more on training and fighting

The first reason why the differences are greater than the similarities is because of the social order in feudal Japan and Europe. ”Historians and other scholars use social pyramids to show how societies were structured” (Document A). The samurai owned loyalty and military service to daimyo 's for land or regular payment while on the other hand knights owned loyalty and military service to the lords. Another difference about samurais and knights was the population. Samurai with families took about 10% of Japan 's population and in Europe, there was estimated 12,000 knights in England and Normany France in the 12th century. One more difference is that there are four people above the knight in the social order but only three for samurai.

The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal

Hey, Have you ever learned about the Samurai and Knights?? Well they had a few big similarities but lots of differences. Also in that era Samurai and Knights they had to be very loyal to their lord. I have a question for you. Were the similarities greater than the differences? No I don't think the similarities are greater than the differences between the Samurai and Knights. So no I think there are more differences than similarities. I’m going to be talking about the Samurai [Japanese Warrior] and Knights [European Warrior] is there Social position, Training and Armor, and Life and death.

You are a child at the age of 17 being trained by your master. He has taught you many things. Soon you will become a samurai. How do you feel about becoming part of the Japanese army? The time of the knights and the samurai took place at the same time. These people served for their country to help provide protection from enemy armies. They both developed feudalism to keep the land in order. The three ways that the knights and the samurai are more different than the same are: Their code of honor, their type of armor, and their training.

First of all, the knights and samurai were similar because of their codes. The knights had a code they called chivalry, the samurai used the code of bushido. (Doc.E) The code of chivalry involved staying loyal to your lord and also to never give up.(Doc. E) The samurai’s code consisted of staying loyal like the knights, but to always be ready to fight.(Doc. E) The code of chivalry was actually created first by about 130 years.(OI) These codes could help or hurt the people following it. Next, is how they prepared for war.

Who would come out victorious in a one-on-one battle between two of the fiercest warriors in history, a knight or a samurai? Feudalism began in Japan and Europe when landowners gave land to warriors in order for protection. The knight or samurai would then let peasants live on their land. The peasant would pay for it by giving them a portion of their crops. In a one-on-one battle, a samurai would win because of their way of living, training, and armor/weapons.

In medieval Europe and Japan there were warriors called samurai and knights that protected their region (Doc. 1). The samurai fought in Japan and knights fought in Europe (Doc. 1). Knights were famous for riding on horseback but the samurai would ride too (Doc.1). Samurai were mainly famous for their karate skills and acrobatic moves (Doc. C). One key characteristic for both the samurai and knights was that they were both loyal (Doc. E). They had to be because they played a big part in feudalism (Doc. A). Both warriors had a code that they abided (Doc. E). Bushido was the code for the samurai and Chivalry for the knights (Doc. E). The samurai and knights were great warriors who fought from 1000 AD to 1600 CE an their similarities are greater than their differences.

A knight rides in on horseback in glistening armour. Next, a samurai runs in, a katana in his hand. One would be able to tell these two apart easily, but look a little closer and you’d notice that isn’t exactly the case. Through social position, training and armor, and honor and death, it is evident that samurai and knights had similarities much greater than their differences.

Knights are the European warriors that go into battle to protect their kingdom. Meanwhile, samurai defend and protect Japan and its people. If the two warriors were to go to battle or war, I think that a samurai would win. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai t= and this can be seen in the samurai code, armor/training, and training.

The samurai have been known to be very agile if compared to the knights, A quote that proves this is from Source 3 and it states that “A knight's armor could weigh approximately 100 pounds. ”(Yue 1) The armor weighing this much can prove to be a great disadvantage when the times comes for the fight on foot to occur. Source 3 also states that “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm…”(Yue 1 )

Nearly a thousand years ago, knights and samurai were the military forces in Europe and Japan. During the time period 1066 to 1868, knights and samurai formed the military society in both Japan and Europe (Doc. 2). Although it seems like they are similar, the differences between knights and samurai outweigh the similarities, such as the codes, armor, and their training.

The samurai’s and knights were two warriors from two different civilizations from across the world, yet they had many similarities, as well as differences. To start, they both started training in their childhood and participated in spiritual practice. One difference about their training is knights learned how to ride horses and acquired great horse skills. In Document B it states, “A prospective knight’s training began at age four or five with learning to ride a pony.” Similarities in armor between the two warrior classes include the fact that both had very heavy armor. One unique difference was that samurai had their right arm without armor for flexibility while handling a bow. According to Document C, “Samurai did not wear armor on their

In my first paragraph I'm going to compare the Samurai and the Knights views of women. The Samurai didn't care about the women. Women were respected before. One of them was named Tomoe Gozen. She fought side by side with men. She was a leader at are and to her people and won many wars. The Knights also didn't care about women. When their kids were gone the knights had to act like they cared about the women. They had to make them feel special.

The purpose for Samurai armor is to allow the Samurai to move freely. A Samurai’s armor is made out of little iron rings. Samurai armor was tolerable for about 8 hours. They had one arm unprotected, so they could shoot a bow or swing their sword easier. If a Samurai fell or was knocked off his horse, it was not as hard to get back up. Knight’s armor is quite different.